C36 AMG, talk to me.

C36 AMG, talk to me.

Author
Discussion

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Feels like a massively underrated model to me. Lovely raspy I-6, much more of a bonafide AMG job than the 430-engine they hoyed into the C43. BOdywork better as well in my subjective opinion.

Which year is the the one to go for? Any difference in power etc?

mercedesman

57 posts

171 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
I have just got my C36 out of storage, it's been tucked away for two years. Had a service and mot, now reardy to be used again. they are fantastic car's, i thinh everyone has forgotten about them. Will try and upload some pictures later

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
fantastic, Are they resilient to rust, or do they rot like the W210?

mercedesman

57 posts

171 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
These one's were made properly, mine has a few small bits of corrosion but only what you would expect from a car of tha age. i had a later E55 that was a complete rot box.

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Thats good to know, which year do you reckon would be the best shout? I have a weird affinity to the 4-speed, am I wrong here?

mercedesman

57 posts

171 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Mine is a late one with a 5-speed box which are alot stronger and have a smoother gear change, just find the best/orignal car you can as alot of them hav'nt been looked after that well.

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Tuesday 27th March 2012
quotequote all
a crying shame...that engine is so special, why anyone would pick the C43 baffles me, its just a E430 engined hoyed in there...

braddo

10,437 posts

188 months

Wednesday 28th March 2012
quotequote all
I think you underestimate the appeal of a V8 smile , especially in a compact car (essentially the C43 was the first car of its size to offer a high performance V8).

Because of that, it does mean the C36 lives in the shadow of the C43 and is underrated as a result. A good one of either will be an exceptionally rare car in a decade. thumbup

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Wednesday 28th March 2012
quotequote all
I do see the appeal, its just that the C43 is basically a E430 engine hoyed in there, whereas the C36 is such a from-the-ground-up AMG creation, massively modified. It also sounds fantastic on full song, and is just as fast as the C43.

As special as the C43 is, it is for me too close to what a C430 would be for me to pick it over the C43..
Im happy people disagree though, means the C36 is even cheaper to buy.
misunderstood car though, and for that reason the numbers are dwindling..good ones are already hard to come by.

mickyveloce

1,035 posts

236 months

Wednesday 28th March 2012
quotequote all
The two W202 AMG cars (discounting for now the ultra rare C55) are different in character , as has been discussed previously on these pages .
The C36 is raw and rowdy ( for a Mercedes ) , whereas the C43 is smoother , softer and has real appeal on account of it's V8 .
Performance is similar , according to contemporary reports with both exceeding their concervative factory (and rather meaningless 0-60 times) , although delivered in a different way .

The earlier C36 would seem (anecdotally) to be more rust resistant , and avoids the troublesome gearbox issues of the V8 car . The earlier 4 speed is 'mechanical' in it's feel and is more substantial than the 5 speed , and essentially bulletproof .

Fuel economy is , again , largely academic , my 36 can return in excess of 30mpg on super unleaded on a cruise , the V8 probably won't .

Please bear in mind though that all 202's are getting on a bit , and won't be niggle free . Most are well used and abused now , and a truly good condition car is rare


flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Wednesday 28th March 2012
quotequote all
Top post matey! For me it has to be an early C36 with the 4-speed. The sound, oh god. Its so beautiful I almost start crying when I hear it.

mickyveloce

1,035 posts

236 months

Wednesday 28th March 2012
quotequote all
Buy not only on condition , but consider that bits of bodywork , like replacing the front wings , are cheaper than sourcing front fog lights (nearly 300) and wheelarch trim etc .
Bear in mind engine wiring looms , which go brittle although can be repaired , and look for documentation which will include preventative , rather than just routine , maintenance .

Have a look at my profile picture ; my 36 cost less than the options on the other car and doesn't look out of place !

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Wednesday 28th March 2012
quotequote all
What a garage mate, SLS - whatever job you have, it must pay well hehe

I used to be a big BMW fan, recent years Ive started taking a liking to mercs instead. Mid-20s crisis? hehe

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Friday 30th March 2012
quotequote all

rubystone

11,252 posts

259 months

Saturday 31st March 2012
quotequote all
You keep making the point that the C43 has a standard engine. It doesn't! Mods to the induction system and cams boosted power a bit but torque was the main target.

Yes, the C36 engine was more modified, but it has its weak points of course. But on balance I guess a C36 is more like my old 190E 2.3-16 than my C43s were.

The C43 is more of a cruiser than a C36 but makes a great sound and can be driven sideways easily. It compares well to my CLK63 and IMHO paved the way for what is the now traditional AMG route of slotting big engines into (relatively) small cars.

I didn't buy a C36 because I much preferred the facelifted C class interior and body.

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Saturday 31st March 2012
quotequote all
Its all a matter of taste isnt it! I much prefer the earlier body, and an throaty i-6 in a merc just does it for me!

I know the C43 engine isnt just off the shelf, yet its much more of a "hoy-in" than the C36 which to me feels more like a "from the ground up AMG job". No stroking and taking it from 280 to 300ish just seem like a bit of lazy badging to me..

BUT

Both wonderful cars of cource.

Edited by flatline84 on Sunday 1st April 10:56

bigdavy

1,085 posts

207 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Topic revival if you don't mind. smile

I've read this with interest as i've just come across a nice looking C36 by chance. Now having never considered a merc, i know nothing. It looks like a nice well kept car with good miles around 77k and good mbsh.
In the past i've had a selecion of high end cars, particularly Jaguars including a cracking XJR. Having owned a few Jags whilst i know they can be expensive, (like mercs) I also know there are lots of specialists & breakers where you can buy reasonably priced parts & servicing. Question is, are mercs like a C36 the same or are they seriously big bill cars? I'm a big fan of the 'older school' 90s supercars (which you can still do a bit of diy) and the merc has really caught my eye, but my head is saying stick with things I know like another XJR.

So could i buy a C36 & do a bit of diy, with specialist backup or are they dealer only. Are there a lot of AMG only (thinking megabucks?) parts or are they mostly general merc parts? The car will be a daily driver around 5k a year.

Any thoughts welcome smile

flatline84

Original Poster:

1,060 posts

157 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
The answer is quite simple. Any rust? If not,its just nuts and bolts and its bulletproof in that area.

mickyveloce

1,035 posts

236 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
In terms of parts prices , older Mercs are very well catered for . In terms of the C36 specifically , then the car is a bit of a `parts bin` special - brakes came from the SL600 / E320 and suspension is Bilstein . The engine is AMG , but reliable and expensive items such as the ECU and Cats can be mended/ sourced elsewhere at a reasonable cost.

I`m not sure how it would compare to an XJR ; my guess is that the Merc would be a lot more pointy , but probably not a comfy on the motorway . Any performance difference is largely academic on the road .


rubystone

11,252 posts

259 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
Most dealers won't know what to do with them and will charge an arm and a leg for anything they do sort out for you. As someone else said, rust is the big issue...the other faults have probably appeared in this thread or others on PH...head gaskets etc.... If the price is right and the condition of the car is good, I think it'll make a charismatic car. A lot stiffer than standard Jags though! What colour and price is it?