Animal Rights Terrorists are GOING TO JAIL!
Discussion
G_T said:
HRG said:
Er.. Before you advocate kicking people in wasn't one of those pictured proven innocent today?

captainzep said:
HRG said:
I suspect that Heather Nicholson was probably just strung-along really. I'll forgive her if she says sorry nicely. Edited by Steameh on Tuesday 23 December 16:18
captainzep said:
HRG said:
I suspect that Heather Nicholson was probably just strung-along really. I'll forgive her if she says sorry nicely. HRG said:
G_T said:
HRG said:
Er.. Before you advocate kicking people in wasn't one of those pictured proven innocent today?

Well she married the stupid roundy faced t
t....
Heather Nicholson
Nicholson, who was raised in Wales, is former nanny who got her first taste of animal rights protesting during the campaigns against live veal exports in the mid-1990s, where she met her future husband Avery. The 41-year-old life-long vegan used to work for the RSPCA but left because she “just couldn't take it" when they put animals down. She was paid £75 a week to work full-time for SHAC and the trial heard that she had a managerial role at the top of the campaign. In April last year, a month before she was arrested, she said while making a speech in the City: "I've got 50 injunctions, an ASBO, I get harassed, arrested, raided. I'm still here. You will not shut me up forever."
t....Heather Nicholson
Nicholson, who was raised in Wales, is former nanny who got her first taste of animal rights protesting during the campaigns against live veal exports in the mid-1990s, where she met her future husband Avery. The 41-year-old life-long vegan used to work for the RSPCA but left because she “just couldn't take it" when they put animals down. She was paid £75 a week to work full-time for SHAC and the trial heard that she had a managerial role at the top of the campaign. In April last year, a month before she was arrested, she said while making a speech in the City: "I've got 50 injunctions, an ASBO, I get harassed, arrested, raided. I'm still here. You will not shut me up forever."
"The Medicines Act of 1968 1 states that all new pharmaceutical products must be tested on at least two different species of live mammal, one of which must be a large non-rodent. This legislation was introduced shortly after the discovery that the drug Thalidomide could cause serious physical deformities in babies born to mothers who had taken it during pregnancy. Thalidomide was not thoroughly tested on animals (particularly pregnant animals) before it was prescribed to women, and this case is the root of many countries’ animal testing safety laws today."
If you disagree with animal testing, tell that to the parents of a child born with Thalidomide based complications.
If you disagree with animal testing, tell that to the parents of a child born with Thalidomide based complications.
Its always a touchy subject Animal testing - One thing i cannot stand is the anti-animal testing people in a busy town centre with really gruesome photos that look like they are from the 70's but yet they still claim its current, scare tactics like that doi not help either side at all
The thing is from what i can see (and this is a Laymen's view) if we had another way to test then big business would take it and save the money, also IMO the protesters shoot themselves in the foot because if it has to happen then surely you would want staff that look after the animals to the best of the ability to keep them as healthy and as happy as can be - with the terrorist methods employed by the people convicted guilty that is driving the people who do want to care for the animals away from the job
I honestly dont have much of an opinion about animal testing because I simply don't know enough about it but in this day in age I cannot see a laboratory being allowed to get away with not caring for the animals and not making them as comfortable as can be, i think animal testing is just a grim side of being the top of the food chain - no one wants to think of an animal being hurt at all.
I would like to question what some of the animal rights protesters would do if someone who they cared about greatly was badly injured/would die unless they get some medication that was tested on animals
The thing is from what i can see (and this is a Laymen's view) if we had another way to test then big business would take it and save the money, also IMO the protesters shoot themselves in the foot because if it has to happen then surely you would want staff that look after the animals to the best of the ability to keep them as healthy and as happy as can be - with the terrorist methods employed by the people convicted guilty that is driving the people who do want to care for the animals away from the job
I honestly dont have much of an opinion about animal testing because I simply don't know enough about it but in this day in age I cannot see a laboratory being allowed to get away with not caring for the animals and not making them as comfortable as can be, i think animal testing is just a grim side of being the top of the food chain - no one wants to think of an animal being hurt at all.
I would like to question what some of the animal rights protesters would do if someone who they cared about greatly was badly injured/would die unless they get some medication that was tested on animals
POORCARDEALER said:
Skii said:
cocopop said:
Utter utter scum.
They deserve everything they get.
couldn't agree more.They deserve everything they get.
Are you familiar with Thalidomide? That's what happens when you don't carry our research on animals.
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





