Animal Rights Terrorists are GOING TO JAIL!
Animal Rights Terrorists are GOING TO JAIL!
Author
Discussion

HRG

72,863 posts

260 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
G_T said:
HRG said:
Clockwise from left: Gregg Avery (main pic), Nathasha Avery, Heather Nicholson, Gerrah Selby, Dan Amos, Gavin Medd-Hall, Daniel Wadham


These are the scum that terrorised people going about their lawful business should you ever see them in the street...

Doesn't that tt Avery have a very kickable face yes
Er.. Before you advocate kicking people in wasn't one of those pictured proven innocent today?
Nope, those are the seven guilty ones apparently. DM's at the ready biggrinsmash

Steameh

3,155 posts

231 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
captainzep said:
HRG said:
Clockwise from left: Gregg Avery (main pic), Nathasha Avery, Heather Nicholson, Gerrah Selby, Dan Amos, Gavin Medd-Hall, Daniel Wadham


These are the scum that terrorised people going about their lawful business should you ever see them in the street...

Doesn't that tt Avery have a very kickable face yes
I suspect that Heather Nicholson was probably just strung-along really. I'll forgive her if she says sorry nicely.
I agree, I offer a councilling session for her.

Edited by Steameh on Tuesday 23 December 16:18

Steameh

3,155 posts

231 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Whoa...my bad

Edited by Steameh on Tuesday 23 December 16:18

satchbot

4,330 posts

230 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Good result. Hope they get long sentences.

Boozy

2,427 posts

240 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
captainzep said:
HRG said:
Clockwise from left: Gregg Avery (main pic), Nathasha Avery, Heather Nicholson, Gerrah Selby, Dan Amos, Gavin Medd-Hall, Daniel Wadham


These are the scum that terrorised people going about their lawful business should you ever see them in the street...

Doesn't that tt Avery have a very kickable face yes
I suspect that Heather Nicholson was probably just strung-along really. I'll forgive her if she says sorry nicely.
agree, she looks friendly enough there doesn't she, all sorry like, send her my way first and I'll vet her (pardon the pun)

G_T

16,163 posts

211 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
HRG said:
G_T said:
HRG said:
Clockwise from left: Gregg Avery (main pic), Nathasha Avery, Heather Nicholson, Gerrah Selby, Dan Amos, Gavin Medd-Hall, Daniel Wadham


These are the scum that terrorised people going about their lawful business should you ever see them in the street...

Doesn't that tt Avery have a very kickable face yes
Er.. Before you advocate kicking people in wasn't one of those pictured proven innocent today?
Nope, those are the seven guilty ones apparently. DM's at the ready biggrinsmash
Marvellous... I'll get the pitchfork and rope then.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

238 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Boozy said:
Clockwise from left: Gregg Avery (main pic), Nathasha Avery, Heather Nicholson, Gerrah Selby, Dan Amos, Gavin Medd-Hall, Daniel Wadham
Avery was guilty of labelling people.

Edited by 10 Pence Short on Tuesday 23 December 16:20

HRG

72,863 posts

260 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Well she married the stupid roundy faced tt....

Heather Nicholson

Nicholson, who was raised in Wales, is former nanny who got her first taste of animal rights protesting during the campaigns against live veal exports in the mid-1990s, where she met her future husband Avery. The 41-year-old life-long vegan used to work for the RSPCA but left because she “just couldn't take it" when they put animals down. She was paid £75 a week to work full-time for SHAC and the trial heard that she had a managerial role at the top of the campaign. In April last year, a month before she was arrested, she said while making a speech in the City: "I've got 50 injunctions, an ASBO, I get harassed, arrested, raided. I'm still here. You will not shut me up forever."

TheEnd

15,370 posts

209 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
"The Medicines Act of 1968 1 states that all new pharmaceutical products must be tested on at least two different species of live mammal, one of which must be a large non-rodent. This legislation was introduced shortly after the discovery that the drug Thalidomide could cause serious physical deformities in babies born to mothers who had taken it during pregnancy. Thalidomide was not thoroughly tested on animals (particularly pregnant animals) before it was prescribed to women, and this case is the root of many countries’ animal testing safety laws today."

If you disagree with animal testing, tell that to the parents of a child born with Thalidomide based complications.

G_T

16,163 posts

211 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
HRG said:
Well she married the stupid roundy faced tt....
Maybe she fell for him because he looks suspiciously like a hamster...

samuelellis

1,927 posts

222 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Its always a touchy subject Animal testing - One thing i cannot stand is the anti-animal testing people in a busy town centre with really gruesome photos that look like they are from the 70's but yet they still claim its current, scare tactics like that doi not help either side at all

The thing is from what i can see (and this is a Laymen's view) if we had another way to test then big business would take it and save the money, also IMO the protesters shoot themselves in the foot because if it has to happen then surely you would want staff that look after the animals to the best of the ability to keep them as healthy and as happy as can be - with the terrorist methods employed by the people convicted guilty that is driving the people who do want to care for the animals away from the job

I honestly dont have much of an opinion about animal testing because I simply don't know enough about it but in this day in age I cannot see a laboratory being allowed to get away with not caring for the animals and not making them as comfortable as can be, i think animal testing is just a grim side of being the top of the food chain - no one wants to think of an animal being hurt at all.


I would like to question what some of the animal rights protesters would do if someone who they cared about greatly was badly injured/would die unless they get some medication that was tested on animals

captainzep

13,306 posts

213 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
G_T said:
HRG said:
Well she married the stupid roundy faced tt....
Maybe she fell for him because he looks suspiciously like a hamster...
Yes, why are his eyes, nose and mouth pushed together into the middle of his face like that?

HRG

72,863 posts

260 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
The fois gras bint?

Saddle bum

4,211 posts

240 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
A one-time acquaintance was in the fur trade. His nine year old kid was slapped around by some of these ALF untermensch on the way home from school.

I just hope they all die slow horrible deaths.

POORCARDEALER

8,625 posts

262 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Skii said:
cocopop said:
Utter utter scum.

They deserve everything they get.
couldn't agree more.
If you are meaning the people who torture animals, I agree fully.

Ozone

3,071 posts

208 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
captainzep said:
Well, imagine Bambi or Tarka the Otter having Wham Bars or iPods PUSHED INTO THEIR EYES?
fk !!! i had no idea that was being done !!!!yikes

I'm never listening to Wham on an ipod again !!!!!!!

jonnychez

117 posts

285 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
G_T said:
There is a moral imperative here. Animal life is not worth as much as human life to think otherwise is delusional and.
Would you care to elaborate on the above point? Basically how you came to that conclusion?




HRG

72,863 posts

260 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
POORCARDEALER said:
Skii said:
cocopop said:
Utter utter scum.

They deserve everything they get.
couldn't agree more.
If you are meaning the people who torture animals, I agree fully.
HLS don't torture animals, they carry out carefully supervised medical research.

Are you familiar with Thalidomide? That's what happens when you don't carry our research on animals.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

238 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
That's a bit mean. Couldn't they just do a bit of a juggle instead?

HRG

72,863 posts

260 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
That'd be selling them short really...