Was thrown the keys to this last night (car review)

Was thrown the keys to this last night (car review)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

dxb335d

Original Poster:

2,905 posts

196 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Following my review of my test drive on an AUDI RS6 not long ago (can be read here http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?h=0... ) I thought I would post up my thoughts on the new AUDI TTS I drove yesterday evening, late afternoon.

not a fan of this type of car as Im not a ''wind in ya hair'' type of person, nor am i a hairdresser.

First impressions with looks, it does look good, it looks sportier than the cooking model and has the looks of a car you just want to jump and take for a spin.



I went out alone. THOROUGHLY enjoyed driving a car that makes a noise, WHAT A NOISE

i mean most 2.0 turbos sound nice, bt muffled by the turbo somewhat quiter than there non turbo counterparts. This thing sounds parpy and loud under hard acceleration but as the revs rise it goes a bit wheezier (As the turbo runs out of puff).

You can hear a whoosh and a churp of the turbo which in all honesty sounds fantastic, it sounds much better than the RS6 twin turbo.

It does sound a little ''Boy racer'' though. Which I didnt mind. I quite liked it.

She is a quick car, 270bhp odd and similar figure for the torque. I got all four wheels (4wd) to spin several times when launching and also when shifting into second with the DSG box. Box was smooth enough but was nice to have one paddle for downshifts and one for upshifts (my 335d has paddles but both can go up or down). Shifts were dealt with promtly and effectively whether up or down.

I did a 0-60 video for you which i will post up at some point. The car is supposed to do 0-60 in under 5 secs i believe.

Comparing to my 335d is difficult as there aimed at different people and different markets.

But on a purely performance related pointof view its ''Slower''

Not only does it feel slower once rolling above 40-50mph it ''WAS'' slower down my tale tale roads. I didnt get a chance to try any heroic drivng, but the car felt planted and stable at speed. The ride compared to my NON runflat shod 335d was good, actualy better. Didnt feel any potholes.

The magnatic ride was good, i liked it. The car handled well and felt neutral. No doubt on track it would understeer though as Audi 4wd inherantly do unfortunately.

Dynamically, it didnt feel as surefooted as the capable E92 BMW. I think of a dry track the Audi would be left standing by the derv. (No doubt some will not want to believe this)

Straightline acceleration the mapped 335d is quicker than the TTS. 0-60 would be close, maybe in the TTS favour due to the 4wd but above 60mph, ie 60-100mph the 335d WILL pull away considerably. After 100mph the 335d is gone. Map the TTS and they would be closely matched for sure.

Its amazing really as ive been pretty unenthusiastic about the 335d lately. Feels slow etc.

It was a revelation getting into a petrol 2.0 turbo. Its was great fun and i enjoyed it, but what amazed even more was how good the 335d felt afterwards.

She felt more ''weighty'' especially the steering, and feels more chuckable and surefooted around the bends.

The low down grunt is great and it really made me realise once again how GOOD a mapped 335d is.

I would not swap it for a TTS. No way.. The 335d is such an accomplished bit of kit. So dynamic.

But the TTS is a great car, a great car for ones missus!!

The interior is typically Audi. Sublime and very stylish. No better than BMW but a different style..



Audi is aimed more for a poser type, BMW aim at the driver. Something i read recently in an article comparing the 123D coupe and new Audi TT diesel.

A sentiment i agree 100% with

thanks and hope you enjoy my rview


Carlos

markmullen

15,877 posts

235 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
Comparing to my 335d is difficult as there aimed at different people and different markets.

But
hehe

VladD

7,874 posts

266 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
Comparing to my 335d is difficult as there aimed at different people and different markets.

But on a purely performance related pointof view its ''Slower''
Oh st, here we go again.

GKP

15,099 posts

242 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
To be fair, nothing is quicker than a mapped 335d.

Mattt

16,661 posts

219 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
rofl - I should've known.

Gravy

2,069 posts

235 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Is this a joke? A 335d is a benchmark car, despite the TTS clearly aimed at a totally different market? Erm.......

If this was an attempt at freelance motoring journalism then it was terrible.

If it was a personal account of a drive in an unfamiliar and new car to the OP. It was terrible.

HTH

OllieBirmingham

5,659 posts

193 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Give him a break, he is only trying to let us know what he thought of the car and you all steam in. You all knew before reading the thread it would be compared to a 335d and come off worse, but its still an informative write up. He didn't have to do it you know.....

clap

NiceCupOfTea

25,298 posts

252 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Diesel Beemer Fanboy In "Preferring Diesel Beemer" Shocker!

;)

ikonic

403 posts

199 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
whatever u say about the drive, i still can't believe you think the interior is no better than the Bmw.

Audi is on a different level when it comes to quality and style of the interior.

dxb335d

Original Poster:

2,905 posts

196 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Well i cant help that its perfomance is not as good as the 335d.

In my last write up, I said the RS6 would wipe the floor with the 335d. I aint got a problemwith saying whats faster and whats not. Im just writing my experiance.

the Audi interior is more sytlish, but no better quality.

r1ch

2,880 posts

197 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Miles better looking than the old model. Is this the quickest TT in the range then?

Gypsum Fantastic

412 posts

212 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Nice 335d review there...

dxb335d

Original Poster:

2,905 posts

196 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
r1ch said:
Miles better looking than the old model. Is this the quickest TT in the range then?
Yes it is mate. By far.


Gypsum Fantastic said:
Nice 335d review there...
Not really, I do though have lots of reviews I have written on the 335d.

havoc

30,204 posts

236 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
OllieBirmingham said:
He didn't have to do it you know.....
And don't we wish he hadn't!!! hehe

Jazzer77

1,533 posts

195 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Why the Audi picture in a 335d review?

wiffmaster

2,604 posts

199 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
The car is supposed to do 0-60 in under 5 secs i believe.
Seems a little ambitious? I definitely wouldn't have this pegged as a sub 5 second car (but wait to be corrected!)

carl_w

9,219 posts

259 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
Not really, I do though have lots of reviews I have written on the 335d.
Is the spelling and grammar any better in those?

HowMuchLonger

3,006 posts

194 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
335D Coupe 38K plus extras 0-60 5.9s
TTS Coupe 33K plus extras 0-60 5.2s

But these figures are completly wrong, because the 335D is the most superior in every way.

A TTS speedster, now that might stand a chance against the mighty BMW.

Hollywood Wheels

3,689 posts

231 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Jesus Christ man!!! Are you not able to talk about ANY mechanically powered device without comparing it to that feckin grey diesel repmobile you spend all day wanking over???

jamesgrrr

3,764 posts

222 months

Saturday 9th August 2008
quotequote all
Worst 'I love my 335d' thread ever.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED