A bit of progress, body off!!

A bit of progress, body off!!

Author
Discussion

diycerb

Original Poster:

556 posts

232 months

Friday 21st March 2008
quotequote all
Finally had a bit of time to make some progress on the Cerb.

LS1 and T56 sitting in before body off. Note the A4 page with the pics of Brummies build for reference!





Lifted the body today with the help of 8 mates, its f'in heavy!! Worst bolts were the ones for seats, all needed to be cut off. All chassis nuts and bolts were fine, windy guns are a god send!!

You can see the engine mounts in the pics below. The vertical chassis tubes were removed and rectangle box section welded in place, just tacked for now. The engine mounts bolt to the box section.

T56 gearbox seems to fit OK, rear gearbox mount needs to be fab'd but no big deal. Got enough room for at least 2.5" exhausts. Bit tight in places but won't be more than an inch or so below the bottom chassis rail.

Looking into relocating the shifter location forward (same as a Viper). Potentially end up with a shift linkage thats visable in the cabin kinda link Spyker Spider style!!





Chassis doesn't look too bad the outriggers are the worst but doesn't look like anything needs replacing.

Next job will be exhaust manifolds. Going for simple symetrical manifolds, they'll be short primaries (1 3/4 dia) but I don't think this will be a problem once the blower arrives!!

Well, after a week of fitting Koni/Eibach's to my Volvo, stripping down the beetle engine for the 356 replica and removing the Cerb body I'm knackered.

Day off tommorow me thinks.beer

Rich.

scruffy

1,244 posts

267 months

Friday 21st March 2008
quotequote all
You sir, are a special chap...

I'm looking forward to the journey...

Good luck!!

biggrin

TheNeed4Speed

81 posts

233 months

Saturday 22nd March 2008
quotequote all
looking dam good !!!!! must come over and see it in the flesh ''...
and have a cupa .ive lost your mob no tho frown

day off tomorrow!!!'''''''''you sure or is it (the orders) lol

oh and if you need some paint on the porker soon wavey

cheers mark

Ffirg 005

2,009 posts

252 months

Saturday 22nd March 2008
quotequote all
If you can find room to get twin 2.5" exhausts past the T56 without buggering up ground clearance then you're a smarter man than me (which wouldn't put you in an exclusive club mind wink).

Engine looks to be quite far forward - I have mine just far enough back to be able to pull the crank pulley on and off the front without fouling the cross section tube. I found the bulge near the rear of the T56 casing pretty much filled the tunnel just where it gets to its narrowest meaning exhaust tubes would have to be either severely crimped into ovals or have most of their width under the chassis rails.

If you go ahead with the T56 I've got a McLeod ripshifter and offset gear lever that mounts on the inspection hatch ahead of the gearshift that I don't need with a TKO - pm me if you're interested.

longbow

1,610 posts

236 months

Saturday 22nd March 2008
quotequote all
Awesome project Rich and I'm sure you'll do an A1 job. So are you going for an aftermarktet supercharger kit as well!?!?!? Makes sense, as there is plenty of room at the front to fit one.

Am still interested in the engine mounting issue - any chance of some close up pics of them?? Do you think its at all possible to make mounts that locate to the standard position i.e. U clamp over box chassis??

volospian

494 posts

198 months

Saturday 22nd March 2008
quotequote all
How much needs to be disconnected to remove the body?

Brummmie

5,284 posts

222 months

Saturday 22nd March 2008
quotequote all
The gear lever pops up around 2-3" before that cross member so that will need some adaption factor. You will havto go underneath the gearbox with the pipes too, when i placed the T56 in i decided to go TKO600 as i thought it would be too tight, but it will be interesting to see your solution. Its good to see some different ideas! Thats 3 diff gearboxes in these builds now. i'd cut those outriggers off and renew while there if i were you though, been as youre going this far. What ignition/fueling are you using?

diycerb

Original Poster:

556 posts

232 months

Saturday 22nd March 2008
quotequote all
Hi Guys, thanks for the comments all greatfully received.

Right, some answers. Firstly, Hi Mark good to hear from you, YHM, we're in all weekend be good to catch up with you and Claire.

Hi Don, would be interested in that shifter if it uses the forward inspection plate position, I'll send you a note. Cheers.

The engine is located as far back as I could possibly get it, the MAP sensor is about 10mm from the bulkhead. At the back of the gearbox is the tricky bit for the exhaust like you say.

Hears my plan.

You can go 1 1/4" below the bottom chassis rail with no problems as thats the depth the chassis girdle runs at. That means at the tightest spot I've got a CSA of 2 1/4" by 10" to play with to get the exhaust through. This is where I'm planning to bring both exhausts together in a crossover pipe. I'm planning on using sheet metal to make the crossover up in box section.

With two 2.5" exhaust thats 10 square inches of CSA therefore thats 2" by 5" box section at the tightest point. I'll probably make it larger, even with twin 3" exhaust thats only 2" by 7" rectangle.

Will be challenging to fab it up, round tube to rectangle and all that but not impossible.

I'm not too worried about getting the exhaust theory spot on, I'm just looking at the exhaust as getting the gases away with minimal restriction.

It'll be boring getting things right first time!biggrin

Hi Wins, Good to hear from you here a couple of pics of the mounts.



Please excuse the roughness they're just tacked in for now.


Ohh that reminds me, must do that bolt up.laugh

You can see where the original mounts go, right at the front of the engine, so you'd have to have long mounts to get to those pickup points and I think you might foul where the auxilary drive belt goes.

Hi Richard, Taking the body off isn't too bad but I already had the AJP out of the way. Apart from undoing bolts, you have to disconnect the steering and brake lines at the pedal box, electrics for purge can, fuel pump and fuel lines. All seat belts need unbolting which requires lifting out the bottom of the rear seats. The door side front seat belt mounts need to have a small amount of glass fibre cut out from around them as they are glassed around after the body is fitted. You can see the upright seatbelt mount tags half way along the outriggers, its not much of a job.

Hi Bum, glad you're taking an interest, I think its good to come up with other idea's / solutions.smile
Been looking at outriggers again this morning, I recon welding in new ones will be quicker than cleaning these ones up. Cheers for the prompt.

Right heres the fun bit. I've always wanted to leave the engine alone and fit a blower. I was very tempted by the Vortech blower from A&A corvette in the states, and still am but I think a positive displacement blower would be more effective, larger area under the curve etc. So recently I'm looking at following the supercharged Monaro path. The Harrop M112 blower will fit under the bonnet with no mods. There not as effcient as vortech but I don't think power and torque are going to be lacking in any of these cars. We'll see I've got plenty of time to make a decision and also other things to sort out first.

Management wise I was looking at Emerald but lately I'm favouring using the ECU that came with my engine, the software you can buy for it looks very good and the ECu itself is very versitle, not many LS1 cars in the states run aftermarket management unless they're dragsters.

Cheers,

Rich.

eLSerbera

361 posts

198 months

Saturday 22nd March 2008
quotequote all
What he says about the ecu is true.

Basically all the GM ECUs used with their v8s (cars trucks etc) from 1999 to 2002 can be used for engine swaps where you need to keep cable throttle.

Rich there should be a GM part number on the ECU, if it is 12200411 then you have the best ecu to use, at least from what I have read.

Ffirg 005

2,009 posts

252 months

Saturday 22nd March 2008
quotequote all
Hi Rich,

Like your x-over box plan thumbup. I'm planning to run lower than standard and keep everything on or above the bottom chassis rail so hadn't considered the space the girdle uses as 'available'.

Also have taken some out of the bulkhead to get the engine back further (my donor had an engine fire so it needed reglassing anyway).

I'll take some pics of the McLeod kit and send to you. It will bring the gearshift up exactly where it's needed - even better for you with the engine that bit further forward.

Cheers
Don

diycerb

Original Poster:

556 posts

232 months

Sunday 23rd March 2008
quotequote all
eLSerbera said:
What he says about the ecu is true.

Basically all the GM ECUs used with their v8s (cars trucks etc) from 1999 to 2002 can be used for engine swaps where you need to keep cable throttle.

Rich there should be a GM part number on the ECU, if it is 12200411 then you have the best ecu to use, at least from what I have read.
Hi Rob,

My ECU is, Serv number is 09354896, HDW number 16220610. Any good? All I've found so far is its a 99-00 LS1 PCM, which is nice as the engine is from a 99 Camaro SS.

Wouldn't mind doing some reading up on it, have you got any good websites? Hopefully going to monkfish performance next week to look at a supercharger and have a chat about programming the ECU.

Rich.

M3John

5,974 posts

220 months

Monday 24th March 2008
quotequote all
Now that looks amazing sir ! Looking forward to following your progress on this one.

eLSerbera

361 posts

198 months

Monday 24th March 2008
quotequote all
diycerb said:
eLSerbera said:
What he says about the ecu is true.

Basically all the GM ECUs used with their v8s (cars trucks etc) from 1999 to 2002 can be used for engine swaps where you need to keep cable throttle.

Rich there should be a GM part number on the ECU, if it is 12200411 then you have the best ecu to use, at least from what I have read.
Hi Rob,

My ECU is, Serv number is 09354896, HDW number 16220610. Any good? All I've found so far is its a 99-00 LS1 PCM, which is nice as the engine is from a 99 Camaro SS.

Wouldn't mind doing some reading up on it, have you got any good websites? Hopefully going to monkfish performance next week to look at a supercharger and have a chat about programming the ECU.

Rich.
Hi Rich,

Okay that part number looks like it is linked to the 1220044 ECU, from what I have read GM are supposed to have used different part numbers depending on what application the ECU was used in (one number for a truck, a different one for a car), but the hardware version number you have comes up according to here so that means its the same ecu and should be perfect to use for an engine swap.

From what I have seen (and a very limited view it is too) the biggest issue with using the GM ecu is support - its pretty much all 3000 miles due west (or 12000 miles south east). If you were staying NA then to me the GM route is an easy choice almost diy tongue out, but with the supercharger I don't know, its another reason I am staying NA but going big(makes tuning easier) tongue out.
Monkfish hmmm must remember them they are not to far away from me.
I remember reading some threads on the monaro forum for guys who have had superchargers fitted, I'll see if I can bring them up, they might have some useful ecu info on them.

My research has been mainly on LS1tech and the EFI live forums. It is a slog though as there is more opinion than proven fact but you can normally tell the difference.

EFIlive have some good thing which are worth reading first.

I have started talking with a "mail order" tuner called wait4meperformance and he is quite helpful at the very least I think I will get a good base map if nothing else. They do the harness mods so that the engine can work standalone, the VATS system removal etc. They also sell EFIlive.

For anybody interested in reading abit more: The main search terms are "speed density" tuning, "mail order" tune, "MAF" tuning.
The other quaint thing about the Americans is that they use the term ECM & PCM, use ECU and most will be happily confused scratchchin
PCM thats Powertrain Control Module because the engine ECU also controls the auto gear box
Useful snippet when you read peoples comments you see people use the terms M6 and A4 - well a setup with a t56 is the manual 6 speed, a4 is the 4 speed auto - nice and simple.

We already have a few GM ecu experts on Pistonheads, the Holden Monaros all have the same ecu as on the other gm cars the main man I think is ringram. Searching through posts of the hsv forum is quite useful too.

There is allot to read I am still only scratching the surface.

diycerb

Original Poster:

556 posts

232 months

Monday 24th March 2008
quotequote all
Cheers Rob thumbup

I've looked at a few of those websites but the rest look interesting.

Monkfish said it wouldn't be a problem writting to my ECU. They install supercharger kits on Monaros, so they've got a base map for me. I spoke to Roger there, very helpful.

Also, have a look at the Wortec website. I was speaking to Duncan last year at Goodwood from Wortec, he also said not a problem with the supercharger. Basically Monkfish install the Wortec supercharger kit which is built up from the Harrop M112 supercharger from Australia, theres a few guys on PH with this setup.

At the moment the plan is (this changes weekly BTW!) to use the monaro supercharger kit as close as possible so mapping etc is easier. Monkfish / Wortec use "HP tuners" ECU software. Apparently you can turn off the rear set of lambda sensors and the control of the air pump / emissions control.

Wiring loom wise Monkfish recommended http://www.painlessperformance.com/ for a basic wiring loom. Not sure I'll get one of these probably make my own up, I've got a copy of the pin out diagram for my ECU if you want it.

Rich.



diycerb

Original Poster:

556 posts

232 months

Monday 2nd June 2008
quotequote all
Hi All,

Right here we go, been making good progress so heres an update.

Firstly, the supercharger is here cool



Its a roots type based on an Eaton design, produced by Harrop engineering in Australia to fit the LS1. It has a charge cooler system with a little water pump and cooling rad which I'll mount at the front of the car. The pulley allows 6psi, but can be changed to get 9psi and even 12psi but thats the limit for standard pistons. And before anyone asks it does fit under the bonnet, theres about 3/4 inch clearance at the tightest spot.

Supplied through Monkfish Performance, the dealer is Wortec, they're both PH regulars.

The biggest job has been the exhaust manifolds, I bought some 180 deg bends of 1 3/4 inch SS tube and a chop saw!!

A few weekends later including learning to TIG weld, I had made these. I found building manifolds a bit like doing a 3D jigsaw, but you can't try any of the bits first.

I know they're short and won't give much scaverging effect but I don't need to chase every last pony. Collector is 3". Being able to get to the sparkplugs was importantwink. Clearance to the top chassis rail is about 1/2 inch at the closest bit, the engine mounts are pretty solid so fingers crossed.





During this time I was deciding how to overcome the problem of the gear shift. The T56 original position sits right where the handbrake goes so that was no good. Just by luck Don (Omerta) in New Zealand had one that fitted and was modified to bring the shifter up in the correct position for the Cerb. So he kindly shipped it over for me.





You can see above where I'm going to have to relieve the chassis a bit to give the gearbox some clearance under that top cross member but its nothing major. Theres a couple of other smaller places I'm going to relieve but thats more my own decision rather than having to. I rotated the reverse lock-out solenoid so it wouldn't foul the chassis, I thought I could ditch it but reverse is SO close to 5th its not worth chancing.

Just lately I've been repairing the chassis outriggers and started having a look at the exhaust. I'm running the twin 3" tubing under the T56 box, just a couple of small cut outs are needed to clear the rear of the box, as I've used 3" tubing I'm sure this isn't going to be too detrimental to exhaust flow.

I've got about 3/4 inch clearance between chassis and exhaust, which IIRC is about the same as the gap between the chassis and the original CATS. Ground cleance wise, the exhaust sits 30mm lower than the bottom chassis rail. This isn't a problem as the chassis girdle sits 25mm lower than the chassis rail so I'll make up some 5mm longer spacers.

Only pic I could manage I'm afraid, sun was coming directly into the garage.



I'm going to fit the exhaust silencers underneath the prop shaft a bit like a Chimera exhaust. I bought two round 650mm long 3" bore silencers. I flattened a side on each and welded them together. Gives me about 1/2 inch cleance either side to the chassis rails. I'm going to rubber mount these to the chassis girdle, also like a Chim. This should stop them banging around. If its too noisey I can still fit extra silencers in the normal location.



Oh yeah, I've built the prop shaft as well, the TVR T5 gearbox uses the same output shaft as the T56 so all I had to do was shorten the original prop, just need to get it balanced now.

Apart from the Cerb, we've made good progress on my wife's Porsche 356 project and I've nearly finished CarbonAl's cerb's electrical gremlins, in return he's making me some carbonfibre engine panels modded to fit the LS1.wink

And if I ever need some enthusiasm I just watch these. Thats the supercharger whining biggrin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxS-mZuh-mE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW52JGR1db8

Rich.









Brummmie

5,284 posts

222 months

Monday 2nd June 2008
quotequote all
Good effort, brings back some memories smile what kinda horses will this beastie make? probably not as much as the torque!? Those supercharger pulleys at the back might be snug! Looking forward to seeing her run.

central

16,744 posts

218 months

Tuesday 3rd June 2008
quotequote all
cool

Omerta

2,009 posts

252 months

Tuesday 3rd June 2008
quotequote all
Looking good there Rich - glad to see the McLeod shifter unit worked out for you thumbup

diycerb

Original Poster:

556 posts

232 months

Tuesday 3rd June 2008
quotequote all
Brummmie said:
what kinda horses will this beastie make?
Hi Paul,

Hopefully anything over 500bhp at the flywheel at 6psi. I believe the bench mark for a monaro, std heads cam and exhaust manifolds is 530bhp. 12psi puts it around the 600bhp mark and thats still std cam. I believe Monkfish saw 630bhp with a mild cam.

Outlook at the moment is to run it at 6psi sort everything out and maybe then go for 9psi, or maybe I'll stick a set of pistons and rods and cam in and go to 12psi. I really like how versitle this set up is, can't wait to fire it up.

Pulleys will be close, might have to do a bit of glass fibre work, but with CarbonAl on board its not a problem.

I recon the top engine cover will need modding thats why I'm having it build it carbon, would be good to see the pulley's from the drivers seat. evil

Rich.

markh1

2,846 posts

210 months

Tuesday 3rd June 2008
quotequote all
I really admire you Rich for doing this project. It sure does take a lot of skill, dedication and and hard work! No doubt it will be worth it in the end!