The dreaded ticking

The dreaded ticking

Author
Discussion

PetrolHeadPete

Original Poster:

765 posts

203 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Hi Guys (moved this from the Speed6 forum as it seems a bit sleepy)

Some advice please.
2002 15K mile Tuscan. Always been a bit "ticky" through the bulkhad, esp around 2-3K. Hard to hear specifically with the ear near to engine.

Been running just fine. Took it out Saturday and immediately it sounded noiser than normal. Drove some 40miles to destination and back and kept it fairly easy. Definately not right !

Just popped off the cam cover to find:



Cam shaft on CYL 5 inlet. One lobe is very sad. Actually by eye it even looks like the lobe is bit lower than the partner and a less agressive shape !

Shim seems fairly normal. Clearnace is about right at 6thou (which of course means nowt if the lobe is knackered!)



Some light wear and has obviously been rotating as it should.

So, guess its obviously new cam time.

Can it be done in the car ?

Would it prudent to whip the head off (there is deffo a minor oil leak from he inlet side around cyl 4/5 ish) and give it a proper once-over and even refurb.

Wonder about the state of the value guides. It does puff a bit of smoke on cold start up...guess the oil is leaking past the seals a bit.

BGB autosport

1,042 posts

201 months

Wednesday 9th June 2010
quotequote all
Sorry to say but you wont get away with a cam, your looking at a follower too. There is no way there is that damage to the cam without the finger follower being shafted. I expect if you check the follower there is conciderable wear where the cam ramps up.

PetrolHeadPete

Original Poster:

765 posts

203 months

Wednesday 9th June 2010
quotequote all
Looks like the grand canyon
So which replacement cam do you recommend ?

BGB autosport

1,042 posts

201 months

Wednesday 9th June 2010
quotequote all
Thought it might, I would go with a standard cam, the tricky decision is what fingers, standard or DLC's fro RG.

PetrolHeadPete

Original Poster:

765 posts

203 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
So also, replace exhaust cam at same time or leave well alone if it all looks OK ?

And replace all finger followers or not ?

BGB autosport

1,042 posts

201 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Depends, will you ever trust it if you just do the one?

PetrolHeadPete

Original Poster:

765 posts

203 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Yup, my thoughts too
Rg followers are £30 each for the dlc ones
There seems to be one main oilway in corner at cyl 6 exhaust
Yet the followers have oilways and so too the follower shaft... So how does the oil get into those shafts?


Barkychoc

7,848 posts

218 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
And also spare a thought for where all that metal has gone yikes

Robertjp

2,281 posts

239 months

Friday 11th June 2010
quotequote all
BGB autosport said:
Thought it might, I would go with a standard cam, the tricky decision is what fingers, standard or DLC's fro RG.
I would give RG a call and discuss, i think the consensus is that if you go with the DLC's you should match with RG's uprated cams and keep them as a pair. I have read elsewhere that the DLC's arent good on standard shafts (may be wrong but its worth checking).

I have DLC's and uprated RG's cams in my car, they were replaced when it had its first 'rebuild'(dont get me started). When St8 Six stripped the engine for its second rebuild they were still immaculate so i reused them (...about the only thing that was reused hehe )

dpd3047

254 posts

180 months

Friday 11th June 2010
quotequote all
Hi Pete there are two oil feeds on the inlet side that go to the head they feed into the rocker shaft on the inlet side the oil travels to the back of the head and stops, it also travels to the front of the head across to the exhaust side rockershaft, then down the exhaust side so the last place to get oil wich is the hottest place at the back of the head on the exhaust side, that is why you need to put an oil feed to the exhaust side on the back of the head to get oil direct to the last point that gets oil. I know of some cams if your intrested contact me.

Night Rider

433 posts

217 months

Saturday 12th June 2010
quotequote all
Hello Pete,

Did you measure the diference in the two lobes. I am also chasing a ticking noise at the moment. Mine range from 39.76 to 40.05

Cheers

BGB autosport

1,042 posts

201 months

Saturday 12th June 2010
quotequote all
Robertjp said:
BGB autosport said:
Thought it might, I would go with a standard cam, the tricky decision is what fingers, standard or DLC's fro RG.
I would give RG a call and discuss, i think the consensus is that if you go with the DLC's you should match with RG's uprated cams and keep them as a pair. I have read elsewhere that the DLC's arent good on standard shafts (may be wrong but its worth checking).

I have DLC's and uprated RG's cams in my car, they were replaced when it had its first 'rebuild'(dont get me started). When St8 Six stripped the engine for its second rebuild they were still immaculate so i reused them (...about the only thing that was reused hehe )
I'm sure a standard cam is suitable but they reccommend new ones not reusing the existing. Personnally i would not be happy using cams with even more lift when there are so many known issues with allignment and over heavy valve springs, thats before we even mention the lubrication of the top end!

dpd3047

254 posts

180 months

Saturday 12th June 2010
quotequote all
Nightrider when you measured the lobes you need to measure top to bottom then across the lobe at its widest point take one from the other to get the correct lift to see if your cams are ok, standard lobe lift is 8.128 mm or
.320 thou X by 1.3 to give valve lift

Robertjp

2,281 posts

239 months

Sunday 13th June 2010
quotequote all
BGB autosport said:
Robertjp said:
BGB autosport said:
Thought it might, I would go with a standard cam, the tricky decision is what fingers, standard or DLC's fro RG.
I would give RG a call and discuss, i think the consensus is that if you go with the DLC's you should match with RG's uprated cams and keep them as a pair. I have read elsewhere that the DLC's arent good on standard shafts (may be wrong but its worth checking).

I have DLC's and uprated RG's cams in my car, they were replaced when it had its first 'rebuild'(dont get me started). When St8 Six stripped the engine for its second rebuild they were still immaculate so i reused them (...about the only thing that was reused hehe )
I'm sure a standard cam is suitable but they reccommend new ones not reusing the existing. Personnally i would not be happy using cams with even more lift when there are so many known issues with allignment and over heavy valve springs, thats before we even mention the lubrication of the top end!
might be wrong but im not sure the lift is any different on the matched cams and DLC's and standard cams? I *think* the difference has to be in material / heat treatment..

PetrolHeadPete

Original Poster:

765 posts

203 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
Heads off !
Am going to get it refurbed and new cams and followers
Have had great "fun" getting it all to pieces/measured/marked/photographed etc
But that's why I bought a tvr smile

PetrolHeadPete

Original Poster:

765 posts

203 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
Its alive again ! And running very nicely. Very ! This must be how the S6 is supposed to sound ;-)

What an interesting, difficult, fun, frustrating etc etc process. But got there in the end. All done with the engine in the car. Yes its difficultbut taking the engine out was just out of reach when I started this.

A massive thank you to dpd3047. Without his help I'd have made tons of mistakes and had a far less sorted solution. Your patience and willingness to help has been legendary sir! And also a big thanks for re-furbing the head with all the nice new valves, springs followers and of course chilled iron cam shafts. Oh and the enhanced oil feed of course.

I must admit I did go a bit OTT and dressed up the engine bay and components as I went, which meant it took longer than planned over all. But worth the result.

Here are a few pics I took along the way. Just a small selection.

Spot the very sick finger follower. Interestingly on the inlet side...All the metal bits were stuck to the magnetic sump and tank plugs


Deffo been buring oil


Check the state of the oilway o-ring (probably explains lack of lube to inlet and oil leak above the oil filter). Both o-rings just as bad


Not pretty. Dave measured one of the valve guides as having 0.5mm play to valve stem frown


And a rather tired looking tensioner to-boot


Pretty !




Honed the deck nice and flat. Plastic covers and grease down the bores to catch the nasties


HP oil pump got new rotors, LP pump was fine and water pump got new seals



Rehoned the bores with a FlexiHone


Wrapped the manifolds to reduce heat in the engine bay


Modified block and head to fit oil pipes to support those pesky o-rings (new)


Everything now off the block and cleaned with Mr Muscle oven


Almost there



Timing cover gets a gasket


Extra oil feed for exhaust shaft



Cranking with battery alone makes enough pressure to squirt oil at the cams *all the time*


Almost finished





Final tweaks to add some "shim catchers" over the oil returns (just in case wink )






I went for modified exhaust cam timing to give a bit more mid-range torque (thanks once more Dave...I can confirm it works ! Broke traction in 3rd at 60mph on a dry road)

Have put about 200miles on it so far. Looking good. Now I can get on with some other chores wink





G20RG B

2,746 posts

245 months

Wednesday 29th September 2010
quotequote all
I wish I knew more about engines,, As I don't really understand all the improvements you have made but it looks fantastic and congratulations on taking the job on. Here's hoping you enjoy many miles of SP6 motoring.bow

WhyTwo

1,154 posts

206 months

Thursday 30th September 2010
quotequote all
Wow! I take my hat off to yo sir, looks like a great job. I'm also in Hampshire (north) if you ever fancy a blast with another Tuscan

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

239 months

Thursday 30th September 2010
quotequote all
Nice job. I like the mesh over the oil returns idea as shims can always pop out even on a healthy engine and jam the scavenge pump.
BGB autosport said:
Thought it might, I would go with a standard cam, the tricky decision is what fingers, standard or DLC's fro RG.
Mis-matched crank/follower hardness was the primary cause of the S6 problems, followed by soft valve guides. Lubrication or follower geometry, whilst perhaps not optimal were not really a problem.

330p4

668 posts

244 months

Thursday 30th September 2010
quotequote all
Pete lovely job did you buy those shim catchers or did you make them
Ian