New Flying Scotsman Unveiled

New Flying Scotsman Unveiled

Author
Discussion

MiniMan64

Original Poster:

16,899 posts

190 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Anyone seen the pictures from York? I was a bit disappointed to hear it wasn't the more traditional green but actually it looks stunning in the black, quite disappointed I can't get up there and see her!





tractorguy

765 posts

159 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Wow!

I think it looks better in "Wartime" black.

MiniMan64

Original Poster:

16,899 posts

190 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all

Red Firecracker

5,276 posts

227 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
It'll be returning to LNER apple green later in the summer after the initial test runs.

Magog

2,652 posts

189 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Looks stunning, quite a thought provoking repaint. Hopefully the NRM will use it to highlight the contribution that the railways and railwaymen made to the war effort.

Red Firecracker

5,276 posts

227 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Magog said:
Looks stunning, quite a thought provoking repaint. Hopefully the NRM will use it to highlight the contribution that the railways and railwaymen made to the war effort.
Very short term livery unfortunately (it is driving some enthusiasts apoplectic). The Flying Scotsman brand is apple green, it's what people recognise (the general public) and that is who the NRM has to attract to recoup the funds and make the locomotive pay. Personally I preferred it in Brunswick Green with the German smoke deflectors.

Total loss

2,138 posts

227 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Could somebody please briefly explain the need for the current restoration back to running condition. Wasn't it restored back to running condition back in the '90's ? Can't have worn out, was it a poor job before ?

Red Firecracker

5,276 posts

227 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Total loss said:
Could somebody please briefly explain the need for the current restoration back to running condition. Wasn't it restored back to running condition back in the '90's ? Can't have worn out, was it a poor job before ?
It was bought by the NRM in 2004 and was run with repairs ongoing for a while before it came due for its 10 year boiler recertification, mainly to raise funds for the forthcoming renovation. It then went into the NRM's workshops in 2007 for a major overhaul. One nice thing is that it is now back using an A3 boiler, bot the A4 boiler it had been using since the 80's.

The boilers need constant maintenance, especially the old ones. Even the boiler on Tornado has required extensive work and that is brand new. Add in the rest of the mechanical components and it becomes the norm to do a major overhaul at the same time as the 10 year boiler works, neither of which are cheap.

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

248 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
tractorguy said:
Wow!

I think it looks better in "Wartime" black.
Me too. Looking forward to seeing her on her old metals at the Great Central for running in. Yes I know she used to run on the ECML, but she ended her days with BR along with quite a few other A3's on the Great Central.

Magog

2,652 posts

189 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Red Firecracker said:
Very short term livery unfortunately (it is driving some enthusiasts apoplectic). The Flying Scotsman brand is apple green, it's what people recognise (the general public) and that is who the NRM has to attract to recoup the funds and make the locomotive pay. Personally I preferred it in Brunswick Green with the German smoke deflectors.
That's a shame, though understandable. Would have been great if they could have done Mallard or the Duchess of Hamilton in the same livery though and put on an exhibition about wartime railways, I'm sure the controversy would've attracted a few extra visitors.

I'll definitely have to try and make the effort to see her in black on one of her proving runs.

DaveR

1,209 posts

284 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
The colour change was a bit of a surprise but not as big as the number change.

Where did 103 come from and what happened to 4472 ??

Red Firecracker

5,276 posts

227 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
DaveR said:
The colour change was a bit of a surprise but not as big as the number change.

Where did 103 come from and what happened to 4472 ??
It's 502 on the other side & bufferbeam, which was its initial 1946 number.

103 is the number 4472 carried later in 1946, post May to 1948. It became 60103 under BR.

RichB

51,520 posts

284 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
So is this meant to be war-time black? The tender is marked NE not LNER so that would be pre-grouping (1921) but then she wasn't built until 1923 by which time it was the LNER. Also the number on the cab is 502 on one side and 103 on the other but surely she'd have been carrying 4472 during the war? I'm sure there's answeres to all these questions and more if I search the railway pages on google. hehe

RichB

51,520 posts

284 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Ah ha, I see, but why NE not LNER? Less paint in times of austerity?

Red Firecracker

5,276 posts

227 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
RichB said:
Ah ha, I see, but why NE not LNER? Less paint in times of austerity?
Yep, black livery with no lining and dropping two letters was the wartime livery of the LNER.

Flintstone

8,644 posts

247 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
MiniMan64]... quite disappointed I can't get up there and see [b]her[b said:
!
I know it's the Flying Scotsman but that's a kilt, not a skirt wink

Boatbuoy

1,941 posts

162 months

Sunday 19th July 2015
quotequote all
BUMP!

Flying Scotsman nearing end of decade-long overhaul

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33584691

Rich1973

1,197 posts

177 months

Sunday 19th July 2015
quotequote all
Been a farce from start to finish, but at least now its been done right.

Richjam

318 posts

188 months

Sunday 19th July 2015
quotequote all
Can somebody explain the time delay in this thread it goes from 2011 with it being almost ready to 2015 and it being almost ready!? It wasn't the MOD running this was it?

Richjam

318 posts

188 months

Sunday 19th July 2015
quotequote all
Can somebody explain the time delay in this thread it goes from 2011 with it being almost ready to 2015 and it being almost ready!? It wasn't the MOD running this was it?