'Poo' adverts about bowel cancer
Discussion
Laudable though this is I find the word 'poo' pathetic and mawkish.
As we're presumably talking about cancer here (no fking big c here) then I think saying 'st' might make some people wake up and smell reality (which by the way sometimes smells of st as well as coffee).
These are the same people who say people have 'passed over' rather than died I assume. Passed over to fking what? Not everyone believes in some made up after life scheme to assure compliance/acceptance.
As we're presumably talking about cancer here (no fking big c here) then I think saying 'st' might make some people wake up and smell reality (which by the way sometimes smells of st as well as coffee).
These are the same people who say people have 'passed over' rather than died I assume. Passed over to fking what? Not everyone believes in some made up after life scheme to assure compliance/acceptance.
Friend of mine at work is paranoid about all things like this and went to the doctor and said he thought he had bowel cancer because of the adverts and the doc looked at him and said
"you are morbidly obese and unable to lose weight, bowel cancer would have shifted three stone off you already, go home!"
"you are morbidly obese and unable to lose weight, bowel cancer would have shifted three stone off you already, go home!"
My mum's partner had bowel cancer, and only found out because of the screening programme for people over a certain age. It was just a small sample collecting kit that had to be returned, and they contacted him to say they had found anomalous results, and that he needed to go for further tests. He was asked to go for a colonoscopy where they found some polyps which were at the very early stages of becoming cancerous. He had an operation very soon afterwards to remove the majority of his large bowel.
Fortunately, because it was caught so early it hadn't spread any further it's not expected to recur. He had no symptoms, and no idea that anything was amiss until they contacted him, so it's well worth returning the screening kit if you get sent one.
Fortunately, because it was caught so early it hadn't spread any further it's not expected to recur. He had no symptoms, and no idea that anything was amiss until they contacted him, so it's well worth returning the screening kit if you get sent one.
tank slapper said:
My mum's partner had bowel cancer, and only found out because of the screening programme for people over a certain age. It was just a small sample collecting kit that had to be returned, and they contacted him to say they had found anomalous results, and that he needed to go for further tests. He was asked to go for a colonoscopy where they found some polyps which were at the very early stages of becoming cancerous. He had an operation very soon afterwards to remove the majority of his large bowel.
Fortunately, because it was caught so early it hadn't spread any further it's not expected to recur. He had no symptoms, and no idea that anything was amiss until they contacted him, so it's well worth returning the screening kit if you get sent one.
Good advice that. At what age do they do that?Fortunately, because it was caught so early it hadn't spread any further it's not expected to recur. He had no symptoms, and no idea that anything was amiss until they contacted him, so it's well worth returning the screening kit if you get sent one.
I believe it is for those over 60. More info here: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/
craigjm said:
Friend of mine at work is paranoid about all things like this and went to the doctor and said he thought he had bowel cancer because of the adverts and the doc looked at him and said
"you are morbidly obese and unable to lose weight, bowel cancer would have shifted three stone off you already, go home!"
If that is true the Doctor is running serious risks of a malpractice action. "you are morbidly obese and unable to lose weight, bowel cancer would have shifted three stone off you already, go home!"
I understand the sentiment but actually saying that to a patient would undoubtedly be regarded as malpractice.
Despite having a long history of serious medical disorders over many years I have always received outstanding service from the Medical profession. Always. Every time.
You would have to be mad to spend seven years training to help patients with an attitude like that.
I've wondered too why they use 'Poo' instead of 'Stools'. Perhaps it's aimed at those who are too thick to know what a stool is.
I'm all for this campaign. My Dad died from Bowel Cancer in 2005 at the age of 63. Five years earlier the family GP told him he had Irritable Bowel Syndrome. When things got no better, my Dad went back to the GP and was referred for tests. The tests came back with the C word, Dad had a colostomy operation but over time it all came back.
I'm all for this campaign. My Dad died from Bowel Cancer in 2005 at the age of 63. Five years earlier the family GP told him he had Irritable Bowel Syndrome. When things got no better, my Dad went back to the GP and was referred for tests. The tests came back with the C word, Dad had a colostomy operation but over time it all came back.
FunBusMk2 said:
I'm all for this campaign. My Dad died from Bowel Cancer in 2005 at the age of 63. Five years earlier the family GP told him he had Irritable Bowel Syndrome. When things got no better, my Dad went back to the GP and was referred for tests. The tests came back with the C word, Dad had a colostomy operation but over time it all came back.
Same here. My Dad was released from hospital yesterday after a 5 day stay following removal of part of his bowel which had polyps that were at an early stage. All thanks to the screening programme. From what the consultant was saying a few months back, they've caught a lot of people, hence it's taken 3 months from the initial discovery through a colonoscopy, to the actual surgery. I'm all for it, too many people (like my Dad's sister) are ignoring the testing kits they've been sent because it's "disgusting". Well if it save your life, you won't be complaining will you!Motorrad said:
Laudable though this is I find the word 'poo' pathetic and mawkish.
As we're presumably talking about cancer here (no fking big c here) then I think saying 'st' might make some people wake up and smell reality (which by the way sometimes smells of st as well as coffee).
These are the same people who say people have 'passed over' rather than died I assume. Passed over to fking what? Not everyone believes in some made up after life scheme to assure compliance/acceptance.
It's tricky to find a word that is suitable and in the common venacular that would pass ASA approval and be comfortable enough for a wide range of people to not curl up and wince at whilst hearing whilst eating their coco pops.As we're presumably talking about cancer here (no fking big c here) then I think saying 'st' might make some people wake up and smell reality (which by the way sometimes smells of st as well as coffee).
These are the same people who say people have 'passed over' rather than died I assume. Passed over to fking what? Not everyone believes in some made up after life scheme to assure compliance/acceptance.
To relate to an audience you have to use language they use. Faeces - probably too clinical a word. st, too coarse and offensive.
Trying to connect the general public to cancer and cancer awareness isn't easy. The vast majority of people aren't as direct as you. They would rather hear the Big C than cancer. Cancer is too scary a word for a great many people. It's too massive. Add to that bowel cancer and the 'dirty' and messy part of that anatomy and it becomes harder still. Add furthe the age group predminantly being targeted.
I've seen it a fair few times. Mention breast cancer and people often react in a more kinesthetic way than then do if you talk about bowel cancer. I think it's an ad that gets you listening without feel unconfortable. You know what it's about, without running the risk of making many people mentally wince and switch off. IMO it's very well done.
FunBusMk2 said:
I've wondered too why they use 'Poo' instead of 'Stools'. Perhaps it's aimed at those who are too thick to know what a stool is.
I'm all for this campaign. My Dad died from Bowel Cancer in 2005 at the age of 63. Five years earlier the family GP told him he had Irritable Bowel Syndrome. When things got no better, my Dad went back to the GP and was referred for tests. The tests came back with the C word, Dad had a colostomy operation but over time it all came back.
That sounds like what happened to my sister; complaints about stomach pains passed off as IBS. Eventually she was diagnosed with bowel and liver cancer and died nine months later. But she was only 43; don't assume its an old person's disease.I'm all for this campaign. My Dad died from Bowel Cancer in 2005 at the age of 63. Five years earlier the family GP told him he had Irritable Bowel Syndrome. When things got no better, my Dad went back to the GP and was referred for tests. The tests came back with the C word, Dad had a colostomy operation but over time it all came back.
Halmyre said:
That sounds like what happened to my sister; complaints about stomach pains passed off as IBS. Eventually she was diagnosed with bowel and liver cancer and died nine months later. But she was only 43; don't assume its an old person's disease.
You try getting them to take you seriously if you're not an 'old person' though. I've had issues with my bowel and at least three GP's dismissed bowel cancer because "you're too young" (I was about 30 at the time). Hell, last time I went about this I argued with the GP because he insisted I'd had a colonoscopy (because his computer said so) even though I only had a sigmoidoscopy.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff