Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 2]

Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 2]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
I'm an average skier.

Looking at my SkiTracks app, the max speed I hit in my one week skiing this year was 78.6kph (48.8mph) and the average was 16.5kph (not sure how the average is worked out - does it include standing around, going up on lifts, etc.?). I hit 70kph+ most days.
I have done a season but was taking it relatively easy this year, skiing with the missus not mates winding each other up.
Ski tracks says 97.6km/h vmax on one day.
Lowest daily vmax for the week was 82.

Hitting 100km/h should be easy for someone prepared to tuck properly and straight-line it.

Impasse

15,099 posts

241 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Carthage said:
Pears: how do they transform from turnip-like unripeness to rotten mush without ever seeming to transition through 'ripe' first?
Ditto nectarines.
Youtube clicky Sweary - not safe for work (but only 11 seconds)

Another Youtube clicky For the whole 7 minute sketch (Obviously sweary, too)


scarble

5,277 posts

157 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
I'm an average skier.
Looking at my SkiTracks app, the max speed I hit in my one week skiing this year was 78.6kph (48.8mph) and the average was 16.5kph (not sure how the average is worked out - does it include standing around, going up on lifts, etc.?). I hit 70kph+ most days.
I'd be intrigued to know how a SkiTracks measures your distance, if by GPS then how does it account for downward travel?

P-Jay

10,565 posts

191 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
scarble said:
AstonZagato said:
I'm an average skier.
Looking at my SkiTracks app, the max speed I hit in my one week skiing this year was 78.6kph (48.8mph) and the average was 16.5kph (not sure how the average is worked out - does it include standing around, going up on lifts, etc.?). I hit 70kph+ most days.
I'd be intrigued to know how a SkiTracks measures your distance, if by GPS then how does it account for downward travel?
I used to know the answer to this, I seem to recall it cross references the distance travelled and data from an 'OS' type map - but I might be making that up, I'm very tired you see.

Anyway, Strava manages to record pretty accurate speeds for a short section of trail called "10%" in the Alps, where you fall 10 meters for every meter you travel forward or so they say.

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
GPS can determine altitude no problem with enough satellites but I think they cross check with a map too.
The Strava app seems to wildly over-estimate the amount of climbing you do and then once you have access to the internet it drops it back down to a more accurate level.

monthefish

20,443 posts

231 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
Edition87 said:
Why, when a car is reversing, it makes a higher pitched 'whirring' noise compared to driving forward? scratchchin
reverse gears are straight cut (because it's simpler/cheaper/smaller/easier) and straight cut gears make that noise
Is that the same reason minis (original) and Metros have a distinctive whine in first gear? (only)

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
Anyway, Strava manages to record pretty accurate speeds for a short section of trail called "10%" in the Alps, where you fall 10 meters for every meter you travel forward or so they say.
For a 10% gradient you would drop 1 meter every ten.
If you drop 10m in every 1m that would be a 1000% gradient and is essentially vertical!

P-Jay

10,565 posts

191 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
walm said:
P-Jay said:
Anyway, Strava manages to record pretty accurate speeds for a short section of trail called "10%" in the Alps, where you fall 10 meters for every meter you travel forward or so they say.
For a 10% gradient you would drop 1 meter every ten.
If you drop 10m in every 1m that would be a 1000% gradient and is essentially vertical!
They say it's called 10% because it's 10% off vertical - it certainly feels it! It's basically a straight drop with a huge berm / turn at the bottom to catch you. I doubt anyone's actually bothered to measure it though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3UP8O-FYd8

2:25ish - looking at the vid - it's nothing like vertical - but it's steeper than it looks in the vid in the flesh.

scarble

5,277 posts

157 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
I used to know the answer to this, I seem to recall it cross references the distance travelled and data from an 'OS' type map - but I might be making that up, I'm very tired you see.
Would depend on the accuracy of the height data then and how well it's aligned with GPS and how precise the GPS is, i.e. the potential error could be large scratchchin
I guess different sources of data can vary in accuracy too.

walm said:
GPS can determine altitude no problem with enough satellites but I think they cross check with a map too.
This is news to me! Satnavs will never cease to amaze me with (a) how complex the science, math and cartography behind them is and (b) how stupid the implementation can be hehe
I wonder, when they tell you how far you have to drive, does it account for gradients?

Shaolin

2,955 posts

189 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
If you abbreviate 1 million it becomes 1m, if you to the same with a billion it's 1bn. Why???
To avoid confusion with lb for pound maybe?

Shaolin

2,955 posts

189 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Carthage said:
Pears: how do they transform from turnip-like unripeness to rotten mush without ever seeming to transition through 'ripe' first?
Ditto nectarines.
This is probably the supermarket ones that have been kept in controlled conditions to delay ripening, once they are let out they just go ripening crazy.

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

182 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
Shaolin said:
LordGrover said:
Carthage said:
Pears: how do they transform from turnip-like unripeness to rotten mush without ever seeming to transition through 'ripe' first?
Ditto nectarines.
This is probably the supermarket ones that have been kept in controlled conditions to delay ripening, once they are let out they just go ripening crazy.
Wait 'til he's out of the room...

RIPEN RIPEN RIPEN!!

[/Izzard]

Battyfine

342 posts

178 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
Wait 'til he's out of the room...

RIPEN RIPEN RIPEN!!

[/Izzard]
You stole my thought!! laugh

dave0010

1,381 posts

161 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
Why do horses need "shoes" also how are they fixed to there feet? Something that got brought up on a road trip and no one really had the answer.

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
dave0010 said:
Why do horses need "shoes" also how are they fixed to there feet? Something that got brought up on a road trip and no one really had the answer.
Hooves evolved to work in grassland, not on metalled roads, so they need protection to avoid damaging their feet. The shoes are nailed on.

The Don of Croy

5,998 posts

159 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
dave0010 said:
Why do horses need "shoes" also how are they fixed to there feet? Something that got brought up on a road trip and no one really had the answer.
Search for 'farrier' and you'll see all manner of shooing...

droopsnoot

11,933 posts

242 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
scarble said:
This is news to me! Satnavs will never cease to amaze me with (a) how complex the science, math and cartography behind them is and (b) how stupid the implementation can be hehe
I wonder, when they tell you how far you have to drive, does it account for gradients?
I was always disappointed with the then-new TomTom "3D" view, which is actually a perspective view of the route or map and not 3D at all, in that it doesn't show going uphill, downhill and so on. Or if it does, I can't see it.

StevieBee

12,888 posts

255 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
What is the hardest, most complex thing a human can be trained to do? Say in terms of mental information processing / decisions (whether conscious or unconscious) made per second?

Landing a Space Shuttle? Playing a piano concerto? What?
I'd have thought flying a helicopter and brain surgery would rank pretty high on this list.

I doubt there's a single answer as 'complexity' really depends upon the individual.

grumbledoak

31,532 posts

233 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
marshalla said:
Hooves evolved to work in grassland, not on metalled roads, so they need protection to avoid damaging their feet. The shoes are nailed on.
IIRC used to put 'shoes' on ducks too for walking (droving?) them by road to market, thus "You can't shoe a goose" though I cannot remember precisely why not.

Capri86

107 posts

140 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
Ayahuasca said:
What is the hardest, most complex thing a human can be trained to do? Say in terms of mental information processing / decisions (whether conscious or unconscious) made per second?

Landing a Space Shuttle? Playing a piano concerto? What?
I'd have thought flying a helicopter and brain surgery would rank pretty high on this list.

I doubt there's a single answer as 'complexity' really depends upon the individual.
Rubbing you belly and tapping your head at the same time! getmecoat
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED