Deluded Jock?

[richinleeds]

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4031915963...

Don't know if the above linked worked correctly but these kind of Scotsmen really don't do themselves any favour's??

Obviously he has no idea that there are also jocks getting blown up and killed in Afghan aswell, the chap really should educate himself..... don't normally start threads on here but just really angry that a member of the British Public can have these opinions, btw this is his profile feel free to leave him a message if it makes you as angry as it does me!!

[Marf]

This content is currently unavailable
The page you requested cannot be displayed at the moment. It may be temporarily unavailable, the link you clicked on may have expired, or you may not have permission to view this page.

---

For those of us who don't plaster our life online, could you give us an idea of what this thread is about?

[richinleeds]

Sorry for the bad link but it's a status update from a very uneducated scotsman who and i quote "got to love the afghans, there blowing the english up left right n centre with camel st, water pistols and catapults haha, British FORCES LOL, OH NO IF WE GO INDEPENDANT WE WONT HAVE THEM HA HA HA"

Followed by "here is something that confuses me, trained soldiers? tts,go out to detect bombs then get blown up lol, some hero more like fking bd,hows that a hero?

[greygoose]

The world is full of morons, Facebook and the internet just gives them a platform to share their rantings with the wider world.

[carmonk]

Facebook, giving stupid people a voice since 2004.



Edit: related to this I saw on the news a story about a female soldier killed defusing bombs in Afghanistan. Jesus, that job must demand the biggest balls in the world. Just the thought of having my face close to a device that could blow bits of me into the clouds makes my spine chill.

Edited by carmonk on Wednesday 28th March 18:23

[richinleeds]

I just don't understand that he obviously think's that it must only be English soldier's over there, these people must live in a bloody cave!

[thinfourth2]

richinleeds said:

Sorry for the bad link but it's a status update from a very uneducated scotsman who and i quote "got to love the afghans, there blowing the english up left right n centre with camel st, water pistols and catapults haha, British FORCES LOL, OH NO IF WE GO INDEPENDANT WE WONT HAVE THEM HA HA HA"

Followed by "here is something that confuses me, trained soldiers? tts,go out to detect bombs then get blown up lol, some hero more like fking bd,hows that a hero?

And there is the reason i don't want independence

And there also is why fish face wants the ballot in a saturday so he can get the drunks in and for 16 year olds so he can get in the idiots

[Happy82]

I'm sure that's worthy of 56days in prison, report his Facebook thingy to the police

[TheEnd]

He'd get 56 days in hospital if a squaddie gets hold of him.

[Mojocvh]

TheEnd said:

He'd get 56 days in hospital if a squaddie gets hold of him.

Aye and there's a lot heading back from Germany any time soon.

[Pesty]

I was under the impression more Scotish young men join than English as a percentage of respective populations.

In fact I thought it was something most Scots were proud of.


This guy is an idiot.

[Oldred_V8S]

Pesty said:

I was under the impression more Scotish young men join than English as a percentage of respective populations.

In fact I thought it was something most Scots were proud of.


This guy is an idiot.

In fact I thought it was something most Scots were Justifiably proud of.

There fixed that for you.

[Pesty]

I agree.

[steviegunn]

Oldred_V8S said:

In fact I thought it was something most Scots were Justifiably proud of.

There fixed that for you.

Most of us are very much so, but like everywhere we have our share of well below average intelligence individuals, given that average IQ isn't that high (104.2 for the UK) and half the population are below that figure, there are an awful lot of numbskulls wandering around, a surprisingly large number have managed to work facebook and twitter.

[Justayellowbadge]

carmonk said:

Facebook, giving stupid people a voice since 2004.



Edit: related to this I saw on the news a story about a female soldier killed defusing bombs in Afghanistan. Jesus, that job must demand the biggest balls in the world. Just the thought of having my face close to a device that could blow bits of me into the clouds makes my spine chill.

Edited by carmonk on Wednesday 28th March 18:23

Was listening to that earlier. Defusing one IED when another exploded. Retreated, and decided to go back in and got caught by a third.

She was more of a man than every keyboard warrior on the planet combined.

[MX7]

The internet should be a privilege, not a right.

[Derek Smith]

steviegunn said:

. . . given that average IQ isn't that high (104.2 for the UK) and half the population are below that figure . . .

Not quite correct as, if you give it a bit of thought, will become clear.

[Bing o]

Derek Smith said:

steviegunn said:

. . . given that average IQ isn't that high (104.2 for the UK) and half the population are below that figure . . .

Not quite correct as, if you give it a bit of thought, will become clear.

Actually Derek, he is correct. Which, if you give this a bit of a read, will become clear...

http://iq-test.co.uk/stats/

(IQ being a global measure).

[Derek Smith]

Bing o said:

Actually Derek, he is correct. Which, if you give this a bit of a read, will become clear...

http://iq-test.co.uk/stats/

(IQ being a global measure).

There are a nunber of ways to show the statement is incorrect. Let us stick to a simple one as I think simple is seriously underrated as a way of proving stuff.

For it to be so then no one can have 104.2. That much is obvious. However, given the number of people in the world it is statistically certain that a considerable number of people will have that precise figure of IQ.

100 people, two of whom who have 104.2 IQ, 49% below average.

There are other ways in which you can prove the statement wrong.

[Bing o]

Derek Smith said:

Bing o said:

Actually Derek, he is correct. Which, if you give this a bit of a read, will become clear...

http://iq-test.co.uk/stats/

(IQ being a global measure).

There are a nunber of ways to show the statement is incorrect. Let us stick to a simple one as I think simple is seriously underrated as a way of proving stuff.

For it to be so then no one can have 104.2. That much is obvious. However, given the number of people in the world it is statistically certain that a considerable number of people will have that precise figure of IQ.

100 people, two of whom who have 104.2 IQ, 49% below average.

There are other ways in which you can prove the statement wrong.

Sorry, I have no idea what you are gibbering on about. You posted something which clearly intimated that the poster should have said the average IQ is 100, you've been proved wrong and now you are trying to wriggle out of it. Derek, I know you have lived a perfect life, but it is OK to be wrong every now and again.