Match.com (Volume 5)

Match.com (Volume 5)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

QueenBee

423 posts

122 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
Gorilla Boy said:
QueenBee said:
Are you ill? This is an excellent sensible post and very true. If a girl likes an intelligent hard working guy - that guy is normally very successful whatever he does. I need a man I can talk to without having to explain everything. The kind off guy I get on with is normally very very clever. I find intelligence sexy.
I see, never realised you were gay Vieste?
Why are you doing this man! I told you in confidence that I was Vieste!!!!

Thankyou4calling

10,601 posts

173 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
Mobile Chicane said:
You may say that, but anyone in receipt of serious amounts of money knows that it's a curse and not a blessing.

My landlord is a multi-millionaire, never married, straight and good-looking. Friends are always suggesting that I should 'have a crack'.

No, because while there might be a lower income threshold, there's an upper limit as well. I don't have the resources to keep up with his kind of lifestyle, and I don't want to be paid for.

The very wealthy are surrounded by all manner of liggers and sycophants. That must have a distorting effect on one's moral compass too. In my landlord's case, he has few friends (since he trusts no-one), and is lonely and bitter.
Well you can curse me with as much money as possible and I can GUARUNTEE it'll be gratefully received and an absolute blessing.

QueenBee

423 posts

122 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
ali_kat said:
QueenBee said:
Ikemi said:
QueenBee said:
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The earnings of all my ex men have always been 5-10 times more than mine.
I can't see how 'beauty in the eye of the beholder' and 'the earning of partners has been 5-10 times more' are linked? How is earning potential linked to how they view you? It makes very little sense, IMHO.
Earnings are a reply to NRS- he pays if the women earn significantly less than him. All my ex's paid for everything. With my current we take turns. Keep up Ikemi.
But that is not what you said up there ^^

Either you need to learn to quote better or you're a troll

I wish PH had an ignore button as I have no self restraint!
What is a troll? Will this do

ali_kat

31,988 posts

221 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
I'd bet my last £10 that you are!

But I tell you what - meet up with me & win it and from that the assurance that I'll shout down anyone saying anything about you on here! You're local to me (allegedly!) as I'm in Northampton.

Any weekend in May bar the 2nd Bank Holiday, any lunch in Northampton next week or London this Saturday smile

900T-R

20,404 posts

257 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
QueenBee said:
Are you ill? This is an excellent sensible post and very true. If a girl likes an intelligent hard working guy - that guy is normally very successful whatever he does. I need a man I can talk to without having to explain everything. The kind off guy I get on with is normally very very clever. I find intelligence sexy.
By my standards, most wealthy, powerful men I know aren't especially intelligent. They're just better at playing a rather narrowly defined field - more often than not at the detriment of everything else including values that are not for sale.

Ikemi

8,441 posts

205 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
Queenbee said:
All my ex's paid for everything.
Queenbee said:
One of my ex's did not work for three years.
I hope you paid for something then!

Queenbee said:
The earnings of all my ex men have always been 5-10 times more than mine.
Queenbee said:
He does not need to be rich
But it helps. Honestly, would you settle for less now?

ali_kat said:
I'd bet my last £10 that you are!

But I tell you what - meet up with me & win it and from that the assurance that I'll shout down anyone saying anything about you on here! You're local to me (allegedly!) as I'm in Northampton.

Any weekend in May bar the 2nd Bank Holiday, any lunch in Northampton next week or London this Saturday
Good call! I doubt Queenbee will accept. Apparently, Queenbee did mention that he/she would attend a few PH meets in the future. This was aimed at me, but I'm not entirely sure how I'd know who he/she was? I still reckon it's a past, possibly banned PHer ... ? What happened to Vieste?

Edited by Ikemi on Thursday 17th April 19:41

Mobile Chicane

20,815 posts

212 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
I reckon 'Queen Bee' = Nolar Dog.

On the scale of attention-whoring if nothing else.

ali_kat

31,988 posts

221 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
Ikemi said:
Good call! I doubt Queenbee will accept. Apparently, Queenbee did mention that he/she would attend a few PH meets in the future. This was aimed at me, but I'm not entirely sure how I'd know who he/she was? I still reckon it's a past, possibly banned PHer ... ? What happened to Vieste?

Edited by Ikemi on Thursday 17th April 19:41
The profile has since posted elsewhere, I think I'm being ignored laugh

Not at all surprised biggrin

Agreed on the attention we MC wink

Gorilla Boy

7,808 posts

173 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
Mobile Chicane said:
I reckon 'Queen Bee' = Nolar Dog.

On the scale of attention-whoring if nothing else.
Quite possible also, fully agree on the attention whoring side of things.

CharlesdeGaulle

26,242 posts

180 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
Gorilla Boy said:
Mobile Chicane said:
I reckon 'Queen Bee' = Nolar Dog.

On the scale of attention-whoring if nothing else.
Quite possible also, fully agree on the attention whoring side of things.
Another in agreement. Not necessarily about ND, but whoring on an industrial scale.

God help me, but I looked at the (rather tragic) 'show us your new shoes' thread, and (s)he'd posted successively with meaningless 'I likes'.

croyde

22,857 posts

230 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
ali_kat said:
Rouleur & Croyde

Having been through the whole cancer thing recently, give them some space & time, but continue to offer to be there for them & offer your support.

When they finally get their lives back they will remember who stood by them, offered them support & cared. I know I'm judging my friends on who was & wasn't there for me!

Just be a friend, that's all they have time for at the moment.
Thanks Ali smile

Mobile Chicane

20,815 posts

212 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
I have to agree with Ali here.

Moreover to add, what kind of a person would de-prioritise their family responsibilities in favour of a fairly new relationship?

No-one worth knowing, that's who.

Play the long game.


Rouleur

7,024 posts

189 months

Thursday 17th April 2014
quotequote all
Yeah, I'm just leaving it for a bit but I'm going to keep in touch.

croyde

22,857 posts

230 months

Friday 18th April 2014
quotequote all
Very true MC. Cheers

Penny-lope

13,645 posts

193 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
So what's new? Or should I just waste my hungover Saturday reading my way through the last 150 pages or so?

CubanPete

3,630 posts

188 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
Nothing new.

But the stasis should be comforting in your weakened condition.

tongue out

Thankyou4calling

10,601 posts

173 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
Mr Roper said:
Have some faith in people...There's nothing to suggest that either woman is bed hoping.
I fully accept I'm very cynical in these matters. But I think there is plenty to suggest the women are not telling the full story. If I'm in a one month old relationship with someone I've known for years and it's going really well, I'd want that person to share my troubles, be with me when times are hard and start to see that we are a team. I certainly wouldn't stop contacting them or send messages that made it look like the relationship were over. Of course you have to spend time with sick relatives but unless you're a full time carer, I'd look to grow closer to my new partner, not the opposite. And as for still living together but not sharing a bed, again, and I don't want to be harsh, but perhaps the family crisis has bought them back together. If you feel giving a bit of time is the answer, that'd be your privilege but for me, I'd want a bit of a cards on the table so I could move on or not.

croyde

22,857 posts

230 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
As the days wear on I'm thinking that above is more the case. After all the mum in law is in hospital, 92 and has had a good innings. Very sad but yes, surely I could have an explanation rather than keep me hanging.

Mobile Chicane

20,815 posts

212 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
To not offer an explanation is beyond cowardly, and changes my view entirely of the integrity / emotional maturity of the individual concerned.

I tend to think you should put as much thought into ending a relationship as you do into starting one, but hey, maybe that's just me.

My take on those circumstances where people live together but claim not to share a bed, is that a good 80% are lying. Very few people would be prepared to put up with such a situation, unless it were mutually agreed they were both free to seek sexual relationships with other people.

In this circumstance, she slithered off at 2 AM, rather than enjoy a morning in bed with you. My guess is the husband believes 'she was having a good night out with the girls and lost track of time', rather than 'got banged into the middle of next week by some other bloke'.

Now that the M-i-L's been taken ill, reality has hit home, and she's deciding which side her bread is really buttered on. You haven't been offered an explanation because she's too cowardly to confront even her own feelings on the issue - never mind yours - and feels guilty as Hell.

Perhaps your own experience of platonic marriage has skewed your bullst-ometer in this case. It bears repeating: the 'secret' of relationships is to have them with the right people in the first place.



GloverMart

11,805 posts

215 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Mobile Chicane said:
To not offer an explanation is beyond cowardly, and changes my view entirely of the integrity / emotional maturity of the individual concerned.

I tend to think you should put as much thought into ending a relationship as you do into starting one, but hey, maybe that's just me.

My take on those circumstances where people live together but claim not to share a bed, is that a good 80% are lying. Very few people would be prepared to put up with such a situation, unless it were mutually agreed they were both free to seek sexual relationships with other people.

In this circumstance, she slithered off at 2 AM, rather than enjoy a morning in bed with you. My guess is the husband believes 'she was having a good night out with the girls and lost track of time', rather than 'got banged into the middle of next week by some other bloke'.

Now that the M-i-L's been taken ill, reality has hit home, and she's deciding which side her bread is really buttered on. You haven't been offered an explanation because she's too cowardly to confront even her own feelings on the issue - never mind yours - and feels guilty as Hell.

Perhaps your own experience of platonic marriage has skewed your bullst-ometer in this case. It bears repeating: the 'secret' of relationships is to have them with the right people in the first place.
+1

Found myself nodding in agreement at all of this, bit by bit. The paragraph about "80% of people in the situation of living with someone but not sleeping with them" is absolutely spot on; I've been in that position (as the cheated, not the cheater) and I can't believe I was so bloody gullible.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED