|
mike80
769 posts
86 months
|
You read 454 words per minute. That makes you 82% faster than the national average.
The questions were easy - it is my favourite book!
|
|
|
mybrainhurts
71,760 posts
125 months
|
I think this is an appropriate time to remind everyone to remember...
Speed kills...
|
|
|
CBR JGWRR
5,164 posts
19 months
|
mybrainhurts said: I think this is an appropriate time to remind everyone to remember...
Speed kills... Am I dead then? 
|
|
|
V8mate
35,279 posts
59 months
|
CBR JGWRR said: mybrainhurts said: I think this is an appropriate time to remind everyone to remember...
Speed kills... Am I dead then?  We can only hope.
|
|
|
CBR JGWRR
5,164 posts
19 months
|
V8mate said: We can only hope.  
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
V8mate
35,279 posts
59 months
|
Oh go on, have an 'I was only kidding' winky thingie then, if you must.
|
|
|
Charlie Michael
2,214 posts
54 months
|
|
|
birdcage
1,748 posts
75 months
|
|
|
sc0tt
7,714 posts
71 months
|
|
|
omgus
4,974 posts
45 months
|
You read 502 words per minute. That makes you 101% faster than the national average. website said: If you maintained this reading speed, you could read
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone by J.K. Rowling in 2 hours and 33 minutes Which is b  ks, mainly because i have recently read in that in well under two hours. It was the only book available to read that wasn't a romance.  As said by another poster, if i was just skimming in a "work report" style looking for grammar/speeling errors it would be much faster, if it was the first time i has read a new novel it would be about 1/2 that pace. I have consistently found that i tend to average about 80pages of a paperback/hour if it is a new book and 100/hour on a book i have read before.
|
|
|
davepoth
20,179 posts
69 months
|
I managed to read LoTR in about 12 hours, but then I wasn't expecting a test on it...
|
|
|
Vocal Minority
2,191 posts
22 months
|
Only 234. My defence is that I tend to read in my head as if I were reading it out to someone. I could have lied, as I have read war of the worlds and knew the answers anyway...hey ho. lesson learned - having done it again I am up to 400 something.
|
|
|
Gorilla Boy
7,348 posts
43 months
|
554  Not bad for my generation who see reading as a waste of time. (im nearly 22)
|
|
|
slopes
27,641 posts
57 months
|
678 apparently, i am 171% faster than the national average
|
|
|
V8mate
35,279 posts
59 months
|
slopes said: 678 apparently, i am 171% faster than the national average Which makes a mockery of the test. As we all know you're slower than a close Amish relative.
|
|
|
Belvedere
56 posts
45 months
|
779 for me - 212% above average.
|
|
|
slopes
27,641 posts
57 months
|
V8mate said: slopes said: 678 apparently, i am 171% faster than the national average Which makes a mockery of the test. As we all know you're slower than a close Amish relative. Oh god, are you still about? I heard you'd f  ked off to mongolia to live? Be a good lad, pack tonight yeah, cheers 
|
|
|
43034
1,753 posts
38 months
|
"You read 357 words per minute. That makes you 43% faster than the national average." However, I am f  king smashed.
|
|
|
McHaggis
8,216 posts
25 months
|
|
|
Zwolf
22,321 posts
76 months
|
You read 847 words per minute. That makes you 239% faster than the national average.
One pass, no skimming - as directed.
|
|