Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
2 3 ... 14 15
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

JumboBeef

Original Poster:

1,730 posts

46 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
‘122mph’ biker to face trial

http://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/top-sto...

Scotsman said:
A MAN is to stand trial accused of riding his motorbike at more than three times the speed limit – allegedly hitting 122mph on a 40mph 
limit city road.

Robert Lockhart faces charges of dangerous driving and speeding at Dundee Sheriff Court.

It is alleged that on 26 May this year he rode his Suzuki Hayabusa motorcycle at 122mph on the A92 between Panmurefield Village Roundabout and East Balgillo Roundabout on the outskirts of Dundee.

Fiscal depute Donna Davidson told the court that a letter had been received from his solicitors pleading not guilty to the charges.
oops...

shambolic

720 posts

36 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Jail beckons!

10 Pence Short

27,632 posts

86 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
It'll hinge on whether he was heading towards Dundee or away.

speedyguy

1,468 posts

72 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Who's going to be first to say the limits are a random number on a stick, & there's no issue with the speed smile

richie slow

5,749 posts

33 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
speedyguy said:
Who's going to be first to say the limits are a random number on a stick, & there's no issue with the speed smile
Well nobody died.

hehe
Advertisement

Who me ?

3,868 posts

81 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
richie slow said:
Well nobody died.

hehe
What we need is a smilie that says "No periscopes sighter to day ,Capt'n" .(Awaiting for PMB to surface to cast judgement on this). smile

Jasandjules

45,451 posts

98 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Might not be dangerous, but it was possibly a mistake......

richie slow

5,749 posts

33 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Jasandjules said:
Might not be dangerous, but it was possibly a mistake......
It probably was dangerous, but nobody died. wink

ears Is that the gentle scuffing of the PC brigade hush puppies I hear coming?

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

26 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
speedyguy said:
Who's going to be first to say the limits are a random number on a stick, & there's no issue with the speed smile
Well, I've just been and had a look at that stretch on google maps and it's a long, flat, virtually straight dual carriageway with no junctions or joining roads on the side mentioned and a couple of short sections of footpath. Down the centre is wire armco for the full length of the section. Surface looks good and there are no crossings until the very end adjacent to the roundabout.

40 mph seems unreasonably low for that road.

y2blade

46,390 posts

84 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
oh dear...bend-over sunshine judge

Dave Hedgehog

5,320 posts

73 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
as its going to court cant he refuse to incriminate himself as the rider and they then have to prove it was him?

Starfighter

1,152 posts

47 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
The defence will be interesting, especially as to how quickly it moves from denial of the offence to mitigation.

davepoth

19,929 posts

68 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
as its going to court cant he refuse to incriminate himself as the rider and they then have to prove it was him?
No.

Dave Hedgehog

5,320 posts

73 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
davepoth said:
Dave Hedgehog said:
as its going to court cant he refuse to incriminate himself as the rider and they then have to prove it was him?
No.
so he has to incriminate himself, nice ..

JimmyTheHand

464 posts

11 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Jasandjules said:
Might not be dangerous
Driving at 40 is dangerous, it is just a much lower risk than at 122. Big problem with anti-speed is it seems to imply driving under the limit makes it "safe", when it isn't and is probably the most risky thing the vast majority of people do (other than maybe walking alongside road)


Red 4

1,364 posts

56 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
8/10 for effort. 122 MPH is a fair speed in a 40. Even if it is on a bike.

0/10 for attempting to comply with the speed limit. Hardly a momentary lapse.

I see "Go to jail. Do not pass go or collect £200".


AyBee

5,252 posts

71 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Starfighter said:
The defence will be interesting, especially as to how quickly it moves from denial of the offence to mitigation.
"I sneezed" - imagine you could get a hayabusa from 40-122 fairly quickly hehe

Derek Smith

16,056 posts

117 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
He could always nominate Steve Cooghan.

If you fail to nominate the driver at the time of the offence then can the person, under Scottish law, be punished for the offence of speeding or only faiing to notify?

y2blade

46,390 posts

84 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Red 4 said:
I see "Go to jail. Do not pass go or collect £200".
Yep. wavey

Steffan

6,190 posts

97 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Derek Smith said:
He could always nominate Steve Cooghan.

If you fail to nominate the driver at the time of the offence then can the person, under Scottish law, be punished for the offence of speeding or only faiing to notify?
I second that question. I am unsure of the Scottish law. Daft speed in 40 limit. I cannot see a happy ending the court will be very jail term orientated.
2 3 ... 14 15
Reply to Topic