Rio Ferdinand...............

Rio Ferdinand...............

Author
Discussion

HeatonNorris

1,649 posts

148 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
North West Tom said:
To be fair, Jar Jar Binks.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,348 posts

150 months

Friday 17th August 2012
quotequote all
Yeah, don't be calling Duckface names.

Hackney

6,841 posts

208 months

Monday 20th August 2012
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
samwilliams said:
Don't get confused between things that are illegal and things that the FA take action against. Rio Ferdinand was, quite rightly, not prosecuted for the tweet, nor were any of the others you mentioned.

However, the FA has their own rules, which the players agree to, and the tribunal decided that Rio had indeed brought the game into disrepute with his tweet and levied the fine that they set out for that.
Very good points!
This.
John Terry innocent in a court of law
FA pursue same charge against him. Nothing like wasting money / time on this again.

samwilliams

836 posts

256 months

Monday 20th August 2012
quotequote all
Hackney said:
This.
John Terry innocent in a court of law
FA pursue same charge against him. Nothing like wasting money / time on this again.
That's missing the point completely. The criminal charge and the FA charge are two completely different things, decided on a completely different basis with a different level of proof required.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

255 months

Tuesday 21st August 2012
quotequote all
samwilliams said:
That's missing the point completely. The criminal charge and the FA charge are two completely different things, decided on a completely different basis with a different level of proof required.
Surely that is the point? The court with the higher requirement of evidence finds him not guilty, but the one with the lesser requirement could find him guilty?

The FA should just charge Terry and A. Ferdinand with bringing the game into disrepute simply for the language used, as they have done with Rio.

samwilliams

836 posts

256 months

Tuesday 21st August 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Surely that is the point? The court with the higher requirement of evidence finds him not guilty, but the one with the lesser requirement could find him guilty?

The FA should just charge Terry and A. Ferdinand with bringing the game into disrepute simply for the language used, as they have done with Rio.
I agree with you. I thought Hackney was implying that it was a waste of time the FA charging him.

Will be interesting to see what Terry gets from the FA.

gpo746

3,397 posts

130 months

Monday 20th October 2014
quotequote all
After reading Rio's recent book he comes across ......not very well

dickymint

Original Poster:

24,331 posts

258 months

Monday 20th October 2014
quotequote all
gpo746 said:
After reading Rio's recent book he comes across ......not very well
Is it cos He's....................

CedGTV

2,538 posts

254 months

Monday 20th October 2014
quotequote all
No, its because he is a grade A for being fined again for a twitter offence.

Calling someone's mother a Sket.

So that's another footballer not learning from his mistakes.