Suarez Punishment predictor

[TTmonkey]

How many games do you think he'll be suspended for...?

Everton fans should just pick the last option.


Edit to add: This is not a poll on what you THINK he SHOULD get, but what he'll actually receive, good or bad.

Edited by TTmonkey on Wednesday 24th April 08:31

[bigweb]

I guessed 8 which I think is a joke by the way!

[mickk]

I've gone for 6, as long as it's more than 3 I think most people will be happy.

[TheHeretic]

I went for 5. More than 3, less than a million. I think that covers all bases.

[Spanna]

I think he'll be playing abroad before his ban is over.

[TwigtheWonderkid]

Spanna said:

I think he'll be playing abroad before his ban is over.

Not for Liverpool he won't.

[Gun]

I've gone for 6, it'll probably be similar to the ban he got at Ajax.

[anonymous-user]

I went for 7

My working

The FA are lazy, they have a handy precedent set by the Dutch FA

Liverpools season is all but over anyway, anything that doesn't carry over will be deemed worthless

[jcremonini]

I went for 8

[Cheib]

I think 10. He got 8 for the racism thing and I am sure was warned about future conduct etc

He got 7 for it when he was at Ajax and I will be staggered if he gets less....repeat offences get longer bans/sentances in any walk of life. I know it's a different body administering the punishment but even so I think it's a precedent.

[NailedOn]

8 match ban and he should be made to bite himself every day as penance.

[Pothole]

It'll be 10. The FA need to be seen to be acting and will have active support from the PFA to make an example of Suarez, despite there being no real need to tell even the thickest players that biting another player is not on.

[TheHeretic]

Pothole said:

It'll be 10. The FA need to be seen to be acting and will have active support from the PFA to make an example of Suarez, despite there being no real need to tell even the thickest players that biting another player is not on.

Clearly there is a need.

[extraT]

less than 7 (previous ban in holland(?), its too lenient, more than 8 and the FA do not take racism seriously enough. Rock and hard place by the FA's own device.

I#ve gone for 7.....

[anonymous-user]

extraT said:

less than 7 (previous ban in holland(?), its too lenient, more than 8 and the FA do not take racism seriously enough. Rock and hard place by the FA's own device.

I#ve gone for 7.....

It was a racist bite now?

[Gargamel]

I went for three, he only tickled him, and Ivanovich didn't think to much of it.

I trust the FA won't over react.

[bigandclever]

I went for 12 because of how the FA dealt with Joey Barton

[anonymous-user]

Does anyone know what time we will know?

[Gun]

10 games!

[GTO-3R]

Wow 10 games!!!