Discussion
GadgeS3C said:
Just don't get it mixed up with the 2010 pile of crap with the same name - I managed 30 minutes, 20 of which were thinking "it can't be this bad, it must get better".
You mean this one?http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1323045/?ref_=nv_sr_3
I thought it was quite good
me, OH and the inlaws are taking the kids to see this next weekend, really looking forward to it.
Trailer had me in stitches !
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3954223385
Trailer had me in stitches !
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3954223385
Cotty said:
GadgeS3C said:
Just don't get it mixed up with the 2010 pile of crap with the same name - I managed 30 minutes, 20 of which were thinking "it can't be this bad, it must get better".
You mean this one?http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1323045/?ref_=nv_sr_3
I thought it was quite good
Veeayt said:
Nick Grant said:
I notice it's a PG rather than a U, the boy watches some PGs at home but he's only 3 1/2 is there anything in there to worry about?
Nope. Unless he's afraid of metrosexual snowmen Watched this yesterday, the mickey mouse short at the start was brilliant, probably the best use of 3d i've seen so far. The actual film was good, some funny bits and gags aimed at the parents i thought?
Is there someone in the studios that is responsible for Boobs in these films? They were quite eye catching for a cartoon character. In Despicable Me 2, Gru's blind date's boobs had a definite jiggle in them!
Is there someone in the studios that is responsible for Boobs in these films? They were quite eye catching for a cartoon character. In Despicable Me 2, Gru's blind date's boobs had a definite jiggle in them!
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff