Ban smacking, children's tsar urges

Ban smacking, children's tsar urges

Author
Discussion

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

239 months

Thursday 2nd January 2014
quotequote all
el stovey said:
the accused said:
There's every indication of a healthy faith in behaviour modification by positive and negative reinforcement being shown here. So PSYCHOLOGICAL intervention is seen as the panacea for addressing child misbehaviour smile But isn't that the whole point of the smack? The smack isn't to HURT the child or do some physical damage. The smack associates a momentarily unpleasant experience with the offending behaviour. The aim being to modify the behaviour by associating it with the unpleasant experience.
Right but the 'momentary unpleasant experience' is either pain or humiliation. I'm not sure thats positive negative reinforcement. It also teaches kids that it's OK to hit people when they do something you disagree with. Look at all the people who think it's OK to hit their kids because their own parents hit them.

Smacking is simply used by people who are either too angry or can't be arsed finding better methods to teach their children stuff.
Sweeping generalisations are usually used by thickos...

See what I did there wink

s2art

18,937 posts

253 months

Thursday 2nd January 2014
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
s2art said:
Seems reasonable. As humans have been smacking their kids, to warn or discipline, for the past 100,000+ years, and for that matter so do many of the big mammals, it would be foolhardy to abandon the practice. Evolution counts.
Humans and other big mammals have an evolutionary history and attacking the weak and vulnerable of their species. Perhaps we should allow that too. After all, if granny can't take care of herself when confronted by a gang of youths, why should the state intervene? rolleyes
Wrong. Humans and some other big mammals have a tendency to look after the weakest in their circle. Even Neanderthals seemed to do this. Your argument fails.

bobbylondonuk

2,199 posts

190 months

Thursday 2nd January 2014
quotequote all
OK...if i decided to smack my kids when all the moral police has decided it is illegal,


Can i get out of it by playing my brown race card? Im sure a lot of people holding the black race card would also play it.

So what happens now? Just a question cos you know smacking (not beating up) kids are a common practice among peoples from developing nations and cultures. The approach is quite simple...what dad and mum says goes. You are told once, twice and then you pay the price. I personally had to extend my palm and got a cane...it hurt, but it was the law in my house, school and community in general till the age of around 12. What it taught everyone was..there is a consequence for breaking the law/rules, and the consequence hurts!

We didnt have Ps3, computer, gazillion TV shows (except A-team and Knight rider), or a lot of pocket money to try the loss of material crap technique as punishment. Grounding us was useless because we would be nightmare at home. So looking back at it now i ask the question....if there was no cane, how the fk would i have disciplined myself? The cane did me good!

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

239 months

Thursday 2nd January 2014
quotequote all
the accused said:
The best we had in the '50's was the teacher who'd clout you on the back of the head whilst walking to his desk.

"What was that for sir"???

"That was for nothing, boy. Now you know what you'll get for something"!!

(it seemed to work for him, too) laugh
We used to get a 6" wooden board rubber thrown at the back of our heads and it was completely our own fault.

"If you were looking at the blackboard you'd have seen it coming".

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 2nd January 2014
quotequote all
It took until page 22 for the Four Yorkshiremen sketch to start? Poor show. No Chateau de Chasselas for you lot!

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all

Countdown

39,890 posts

196 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
the accused said:
The best we had in the '50's was the teacher who'd clout you on the back of the head whilst walking to his desk.

"What was that for sir"???

"That was for nothing, boy. Now you know what you'll get for something"!!
Seriously - would you accept any teacher doing that to one of your children nowadays?



WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

239 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
I have no problem with the blackboard rubber tactic still being employed in fact it should be compulsory...

ADM06

1,077 posts

172 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
I was smacked as a child and I don't go around hitting people.
Not really conclusive but I doubt I'm alone.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
So what? Some people are smacked and do fine, some don't. Ditto those who are not smacked,but see above for some info as to risk evaluation.

WW: back under your bridge!

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

239 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
So what? Some people are smacked and do fine, some don't. Ditto those who are not smacked,but see above for some info as to risk evaluation.

WW: back under your bridge!
Children could then choose whether to be hit with the board rubber or not. Simply keep looking at the front of the classroom to indicate your chosen board rubber preference...

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
Yet again, the false dichotomy between smacking and 27 years in the Chateau d'If.

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

233 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
Sorry, late to the party here.

Who is winning? The emotional or the physical abusers?

lincsls2

3,335 posts

140 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
punchhehe

Countdown

39,890 posts

196 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
Rude-boy said:
Sorry, late to the party here.

Who is winning? The emotional or the physical abusers?
Wouldn't physical abuse also cause emotional injury?

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

239 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
Countdown said:
Rude-boy said:
Sorry, late to the party here.

Who is winning? The emotional or the physical abusers?
Wouldn't physical abuse also cause emotional injury?
You'd best ask Max Mosley (allegedly).

turbobloke

103,955 posts

260 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
Countdown said:
Rude-boy said:
Sorry, late to the party here.

Who is winning? The emotional or the physical abusers?
Wouldn't physical abuse also cause emotional injury?
You'd best ask Max Mosley (allegedly).
Asking him would be a spanking good idea.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 3rd January 2014
quotequote all
Nipple clamps - the obvious answer to all problems! Job, as they say, jobbed.

Ridgemont

6,570 posts

131 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
Apparently the UK Children's Commmisioners have all united to report the UK gov to the UN for its failure to ban smacking; it's failure to do so may place it in breach of the UNCRC.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-ord...

How does this square with the recent case of the judge finding that cultural context should be a consideration as to whether smacking is considered child abuse?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jud...

I'm all confuzzeled.



Terminator X

15,080 posts

204 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
Still don't understand why anyone smacks their kids. If they do something you don't want them to do state if you do it again X will happen, if they do it again do X. Not fking hard is it banghead

TX.

PS X is usually witholding something like pocket money or playing on the X Box etc.