petrol vs diesel running costs - dont understand!

petrol vs diesel running costs - dont understand!

Author
Discussion

dowsett

Original Poster:

58 posts

124 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
Ive read and been told that anything over 10k miles a year then a diesel will work out cheapest. But does it?

Im looking for a used car and what i normally do with anything is look at the make/model i want and then go from there. So lets just say for this example:

1.6 petrol ford focus

vs

1.6 diesel ford focus


if i do 5k miles a year then it'd still be better value wouldnt it?

cheaper tax on the diesel is a definate.

diesel is more expensive per littre and you get more mpg - so you wont be going to the petrol station and buying as much.


Am i missing something? are parts more expensive? diesels have more problems?

Sorry if this is a stupid question or if its been debated to death before but i just cant seem to understand it.

zeppelin101

724 posts

193 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
Normally offset in the cost to buy.

Diesels have better residuals so the argument goes that with the money you saved over buying the diesel in the first place you may be better off.

It depends on the content of those miles too. For instance, diesels take longer to warm up than the petrol equivalent so for just pottering around town, the petrol is more suited.

I got my mum out of a 2.2d X-Type and into a 1.0l Focus on the last point. Fuel is cheaper and it gets 5-10mpg more on her normal driving routes.

jkb89

55 posts

135 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
Diesel cars tend to cost more to buy in the first place.


And, 8p difference per litre x 4.54 = 36p per gallon worse off for diesel.

As the miles done increases the difference in fuel cost to savings from higher mpg negates the difference in fuel prices until you get a +ve (saving) over X miles.

kambites

67,643 posts

222 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
I think the main point is that modern diesels have components which have a strong tendency to fail if not properly warmed up. If you use a modern diesel solely for short trips, the chances are you'll be on first name terms with whoever who buy particulate filters from.

If you do 5k miles a year by driving one 70 mile trip every week, a diesel makes sense. If you do a five mile each way commute every day, it doesn't.

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 7th January 14:17

davamer23

1,127 posts

155 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
In addition; Most modern diesels not really suited to lower mileage uses either and things like DPF's etc suffer so some could argue that a diesel doing 5k miles a year may throw up larger bills for bits going wrong.

Toaster Pilot

14,622 posts

159 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
I'd be interested to see how this situation changes in say, 10 years time when there are hardly any petrol cars for sale in certain categories - try finding a nearly new petrol Passat for example and you'll find many orders of magnitude more have a diesel engine.

Plenty of ~2003 petrol cars around, how many 2013s will there be in 2023?

Shaoxter

4,090 posts

125 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
If you're looking at high mileage diesels (getting to 100k) then be very careful of the DPF and turbo, which both cost over £1k each to replace.

Unless you're doing significant motorway miles a petrol is a better option, another plus being that they don't sound like tractors.

HannsG

3,048 posts

135 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
After 15 years of non stop diesels. I am never buying another again.

DPFs and fuel prices and servicing costs have put me right off.

bicycleshorts

1,939 posts

162 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
Toaster Pilot said:
I'd be interested to see how this situation changes in say, 10 years time when there are hardly any petrol cars for sale in certain categories - try finding a nearly new petrol Passat for example and you'll find many orders of magnitude more have a diesel engine.

Plenty of ~2003 petrol cars around, how many 2013s will there be in 2023?
My theory: the price of diesel will sky rocket making them all redundant. Everyone will buy new petrol/electric cars. Then a scrappage scheme will sort most of the remaining "old" diesels. The diesel Passat will become a cult icon and Next will sell t-shirts with them on.

wink

Toaster Pilot

14,622 posts

159 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
bicycleshorts said:
My theory: the price of diesel will sky rocket making them all redundant. Everyone will buy new petrol/electric cars. Then a scrappage scheme will sort most of the remaining "old" diesels. The diesel Passat will become a cult icon and Next will sell t-shirts with them on.

wink
Ooo, better keep my 1999 Skoda Felicia diesel then, future classic hehe

sparkyhx

4,153 posts

205 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
Servicing cost are usually higher on Diesels - another factor
you can also pay more for insurance as well.

A study by Which (a few years ago now admittedly) proved you NEVER got your money back particularly from higher end diesels like Audi and BMW.

Edited by sparkyhx on Tuesday 7th January 14:47

swisstoni

17,093 posts

280 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
When did DPFs come in approx.?

pherlopolus

2,088 posts

159 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
sparkyhx said:
Servicing cost are usually higher on Diesels - another factor
really?


Toaster Pilot

14,622 posts

159 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
pherlopolus said:
sparkyhx said:
Servicing cost are usually higher on Diesels - another factor
really?
Based on the servicing costs for my petrol Kia Rio, I fail to see how main dealer servicing for boring stuff like that can possibly cost any more!

Monty Python

4,812 posts

198 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
When did DPFs come in approx.?
Varies from one model to the next, but around 2001 was when they started to appear.

RE92

699 posts

125 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
If it's an old focus then it may not have all the junk that goes wrong.

My old 1.8 TDDI had no DPF and seemed to get 50mpg regardless of usage.

davamer23

1,127 posts

155 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
When did DPFs come in approx.?
From Wiki;

Particulate filters have been in use on non-road machines since 1980, and in automobiles since 1985.[citation needed] Diesel engines during combustion of the fuel/air mix produce a variety of particles generically classified as diesel particulate matter due to incomplete combustion.

dowsett

Original Poster:

58 posts

124 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
I think the main point is that modern diesels have components which have a strong tendency to fail if not properly warmed up. If you use a modern diesel solely for short trips, the chances are you'll be on first name terms with whoever who buy particulate filters from.

If you do 5k miles a year by driving one 70 mile trip every week, a diesel makes sense. If you do a five mile each way commute every day, it doesn't.

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 7th January 14:17
Thats kind of what i was looking for in the least technical kind of response.

I agree with all the posts. I sort of knew that petrol would be cheaper but on paper, couldnt work out how.

plus, ive ever only owned petrol cars. imo, much more fun to drive smile

davamer23

1,127 posts

155 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
Read on a bit more;

Citroën was the first company to make them standard fit on passenger cars in 2000, in anticipation of the future Euro V regulations.

kambites

67,643 posts

222 months

Tuesday 7th January 2014
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
When did DPFs come in approx.?
I think they started to appear around 2000 and have been fitted to pretty much everything since about 2005.