Selling a business

Author
Discussion

HIS LM

Original Poster:

1,294 posts

260 months

Friday 31st January 2014
quotequote all
528Sport said:
You said in an earlier post no selling price was discussed.

If they didn't discuss selling price with you they can't simply come after you for commission owed, I would assume that the commission is percentage of selling price and not a fixed fee??

Sorry I should have said agreed not discussed I cannot remember if the commission is % or fixed
The demand is based on a notional selling price it must be as I have not sold it


richardxjr

7,561 posts

211 months

Friday 31st January 2014
quotequote all
I'm all for fighting stuff on my tod, but in this case it really does need a solr firing a letter over the bow.

Otherwise they'll just keep upping the pressure and you will eventually need one and it will cost you more.


Steffan

10,362 posts

229 months

Friday 31st January 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Tonker is absolutely right on the probable terms from this crowd. If you agreed the terms and they carried out work on your behalf securing a possible sa;e then the resulting invoice does not surprise me.

Could be a Solicitors letter will stop this but I doubt it. I think you will have to either fight your corner against what appears to be a possible determined claim and hope for a settlement prior to court for a much reduced sum or see this through. From all the details it would seem unlikely that this crowd will give up easily. I hope this works out for you. Good luck.

HIS LM

Original Poster:

1,294 posts

260 months

Friday 31st January 2014
quotequote all
richardxjr said:
Yes 6 years since you ever/last acknowledged the debt. Limitation Act 1980. Ignore if so.

ETA Be very careful not to re-acknowledge any debt through any communication.
Could somebody elaborate on this limitation - I have not acknowledged the debt in 6 years so does this stand

Steffan

10,362 posts

229 months

Friday 31st January 2014
quotequote all
HIS LM said:
richardxjr said:
Yes 6 years since you ever/last acknowledged the debt. Limitation Act 1980. Ignore if so.

ETA Be very careful not to re-acknowledge any debt through any communication.
Could somebody elaborate on this limitation - I have not acknowledged the debt in 6 years so does this stand
There are a number of qualifications to the Statute of Limitations Act effects. To give advice we need detailed information ( or at least attempt the advice??). A timetable setting out the timeline/events would suffice. Correspondence and letters of admission or similar might affect the effective outcome. There can be recognition of the debt by correspondence which might negate the limitations.

DSLiverpool

14,768 posts

203 months

Monday 22nd September 2014
quotequote all
What happened ?

HIS LM

Original Poster:

1,294 posts

260 months

Monday 22nd September 2014
quotequote all
DSLiverpool said:
What happened ?
Case closed - PM me for full story

bad company

18,671 posts

267 months

Monday 22nd September 2014
quotequote all
HIS LM said:
Case closed - PM me for full story
Can't you post some details of how it ended?

Zoon

6,716 posts

122 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2014
quotequote all
bad company said:
Can't you post some details of how it ended?
Yes I'd be interested in this also.