Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away!: Ch5 9pm

Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away!: Ch5 9pm

Author
Discussion

Legacywr

Original Poster:

12,086 posts

188 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
Brand new series looking at cash-strapped Britain from the perspectives of debtors, creditors and debt collectors. In this episode, an army veteran is evicted from his home of 19 years.

Laurel Green

30,776 posts

232 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
Have it on record as am going to watch the new series of Silks. smile

omgus

7,305 posts

175 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
i did have some sympathy for someone caught out on a logbook loan.

It went once the owner arrived and turned out to be a moron.


chibbard

1,554 posts

260 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
2 bloody intervals in less than 20 minutes bloody annoys me....

ewolg

1,678 posts

279 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
Felt sorry for chap being evicted. Two hours isn't a lot of time to get everything out.

GG89

3,527 posts

186 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
It's not 2 hours though, is it? They all know it's coming and have had ample time to try and sort something out.

I do have sympathy to a certain extent as it must be really horrible but they've had multiple warnings.

TheD

3,133 posts

199 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
chibbard said:
2 bloody intervals in less than 20 minutes bloody annoys me....
This pissed me off more than the show.

Did feel sorry for the Army vet. Northern Ireland, Falklands and the Gulf and he is on the scrap heap. Something not right. I do agree he will have had time and warnings.

ewolg

1,678 posts

279 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
TheD said:
This pissed me off more than the show.

Did feel sorry for the Army vet. Northern Ireland, Falklands and the Gulf and he is on the scrap heap. Something not right. I do agree he will have had time and warnings.
Yes i was referring to him in fact, sad state of affairs.

Sarkmeister

1,665 posts

218 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
TheD said:
This pissed me off more than the show.

Did feel sorry for the Army vet. Northern Ireland, Falklands and the Gulf and he is on the scrap heap. Something not right. I do agree he will have had time and warnings.
I do feel sorry for him, but despite being £30k in debt he still had a fairly recent looking apple laptop and a huge TV. I assume buying those didnt help....

iva cosworth

44,044 posts

163 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
Scouser a bit aggressive,didn't do him any good,as usual.

Smashing windscreen.........rolleyes

chibbard

1,554 posts

260 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
Something wasn't ringing true to me with regards to the army guy. Earlier in the program they said he had a 30% shared ownership of the house! however nearer the end they were saying he had a £700.00 a month mortgage to pay....

GG89

3,527 posts

186 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
chibbard said:
Something wasn't ringing true to me with regards to the army guy. Earlier in the program they said he had a 30% shared ownership of the house! however nearer the end they were saying he had a £700.00 a month mortgage to pay....
Yip. Re-mortgaged and spunked it on shiney apple laptops and 60 inch flat screens perhaps?

Legacywr

Original Poster:

12,086 posts

188 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
GG89 said:
chibbard said:
Something wasn't ringing true to me with regards to the army guy. Earlier in the program they said he had a 30% shared ownership of the house! however nearer the end they were saying he had a £700.00 a month mortgage to pay....
Yip. Re-mortgaged and spunked it on shiney apple laptops and 60 inch flat screens perhaps?
Wasn't it that the house was a 30/70 shared ownership with a housing association, and he was still having to pay rent for the HA's share. And, I think he said that his 30% was actually paid for.

kev1974

4,029 posts

129 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
More debt porn. A lot of these shows about all of a sudden.

ralphrj

3,523 posts

191 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
kev1974 said:
More debt porn. A lot of these shows about all of a sudden.
Not really new though are they?

I can remember 'Bank of Mum & Dad' a programme about twenty-somethings having to be bailed out by their parents being shown 10 years ago.

mini1380cc

2,944 posts

171 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
Wasn't it that the house was a 30/70 shared ownership with a housing association, and he was still having to pay rent for the HA's share. And, I think he said that his 30% was actually paid for.
Yeah this was it. Despite losing his share of the house to clear other debt, he still had to pay rent to the HA for their share. Paying rent on a property that you cant use must suck the big one. He did seem to be an emotional wreck, and losing the dog wouldn't have helped.

If he has genuine health issues that prevent him from pulling a full time wage then this is where the benefits system should be working.

mark944gold

125 posts

162 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
mini1380cc said:
Yeah this was it. Despite losing his share of the house to clear other debt, he still had to pay rent to the HA for their share. Paying rent on a property that you cant use must suck the big one. He did seem to be an emotional wreck, and losing the dog wouldn't have helped.

If he has genuine health issues that prevent him from pulling a full time wage then this is where the benefits system should be working.
However it sounds like the debt came from inland revenue, so I guess he had tried to avoid paying his fair share of tax, not hard for someone who gets paid in cash most of the time. Maybe the benefit system should not step in and help him.

paulw123

3,201 posts

190 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
no sympathy for any of the cases on here. they are given so much warning then blame everyone but themselves.

Liverpool man should have been prosecuted for far more including threats to kill etc. In the end he got a fine £15 more than being caught doing 35 in a 30 limit. Utter scum.

Legacywr

Original Poster:

12,086 posts

188 months

Monday 3rd March 2014
quotequote all
Heads up folks! smile

SPR2

3,182 posts

196 months

Monday 3rd March 2014
quotequote all
Not an easy job for these guys but they are very patient with folks.