TVR emissions

Author
Discussion

julian64

Original Poster:

14,317 posts

255 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Seems like some bad news for TVR's. According to my MOT inspector whos just had his yearly training, TVR have been removed for the emissions exemption, for lambda etc.

Considering the cars could never pass this when delivered from the factory this seems like a bit of a blow.

When the inspector mentioned this to the guy running the training apparantly the reply was that the government was trying to get those heaps of s*** off the road.

Low and behold

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...

I can't seem to find TVR in there any more. Anyone got any news? I can't believe this is true.

TT Tim

4,162 posts

248 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
That's a tad worrying!


julian64

Original Poster:

14,317 posts

255 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
TT Tim said:
That's a tad worrying!

Thats the old one isn't it. Its been removed from the latest version

TimJM

1,497 posts

211 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
I didn't think different emission levels could be applied retrospectively.

That's not fair at all and doesn't bode well for my MOT tomorrow. Rather than spending money putting cats on my car yesterday perhaps I should have just used that money for a bribe.

Stupid short sighted rules. Over a cars lifetime a TVR will emit far less emissions than a modern family saloon.

Billiam

135 posts

123 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Well more fool the governmet.. means alot more MOT pockets will get lined no doubt... time to buy me an industrial unit and get MOT licensed i fink wink

But i assume as mentioned above that is old one since i done a page search and TVR are definately there !! Page 131..

Wildfire

9,790 posts

253 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
What about us who have no cats?

Milky400

1,960 posts

179 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
an extra beer to my friendly garage

glennamy

63 posts

122 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Milky400 said:
an extra beer to my friendly garage
They will have to start breathalysing MOT testers, as they will be permantly bladdered at this rate! :0)

snorky

2,322 posts

252 months

Saturday 12th April 2014
quotequote all
perhaps we come under this...

"All kit-cars and amateur built vehicles first used before 1 August 1998."



last year (and the one before actually) my MOT tester said - it is the same as a kit car - only test for visible smoke....PASS!

SMB

1,513 posts

267 months

Saturday 12th April 2014
quotequote all
julian64 said:
Seems like some bad news for TVR's. According to my MOT inspector whos just had his yearly training, TVR have been removed for the emissions exemption, for lambda etc.

Considering the cars could never pass this when delivered from the factory this seems like a bit of a blow.

When the inspector mentioned this to the guy running the training apparantly the reply was that the government was trying to get those heaps of s*** off the road.

Low and behold

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...

I can't seem to find TVR in there any more. Anyone got any news? I can't believe this is true.
If the link you posted is the current one, I can find tvr in there.....

ukdj

1,004 posts

185 months

Saturday 12th April 2014
quotequote all
It's in there on page 147 ...

TVR
VIN Code consists of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th digit of the VIN number.
S Series (S4C 2.9l & V8S 4.0l)
S4C VIN Code DSC2P 0.5 800 950 0.3 200 0.9 1.1 2500 3000 75
V8S VIN Code DSC4P 0.5 700 900 0.3 200 0.9 1.1 2500 3000 75
Griffith & Chimaera (400, 430, 450 & 500)
4.0l VIN Code DGC4P or AA01R & DCC4P or BA01R 0.5 700 900 0.3 200 0.9 1.1 2500 3000 75
5.0l VIN Code DGC5P or AA04R & DCC5P or BA04R 0.5 700 900 0.3 200 0.9 1.1 2500 3000 75
4.5l VIN Code BA03R 0.5 700 900 0.3 200 0.9 1.1 2500 3000 75
5.0l (LP) VIN Code DCC5P 0.5 700 900 0.3 200 0.9 1.1 2500 3000 75
4.3l VIN Code DGC3P & DCC3P 0.5 750 950 0.3 200 0.9 1.1 2500 3000 75
Cerbera, Cerbera Straight 6, Tuscan Speed 6, Tamora, T350 & Sagaris
3.6l VIN Code FA17A, EA17A & FC17A 0.5 900 1000 0.3 200 0.9 1.2 2500 3000 85
4.0l VIN Code CB16A, EA15A, EA16A & SA16A 0.5 900 1000 0.3 200 0.9 1.2 2500 3000 85
4.2l VIN Code FAC2P or CA11A 0.5 900 1000 0.3 200 0.9 1.2 2500 3000 85
4.5l VIN Code FAC5P or CB12A

ellroy

7,046 posts

226 months

Saturday 12th April 2014
quotequote all
I have heard tales of one northern garage that always has a brand new ford fiesta in the garage for some unknown reason......

scotty_d

6,795 posts

195 months

Saturday 12th April 2014
quotequote all
ellroy said:
I have heard tales of one northern garage that always has a brand new ford fiesta in the garage for some unknown reason......
I know of tests that a car does not even have to leave your own drive way to pass wink

B17NNS

18,506 posts

248 months

Saturday 12th April 2014
quotequote all
snorky said:
amateur built vehicles
hehe

RobertoBlanco

265 posts

130 months

Sunday 13th April 2014
quotequote all
It doesn't make too much sense too use other emission threshold values as those who were in effect as the car was registered fisrt. It's quite illogical and stupid to think, that older cars would be able to beat more modern emission values. Plus don't think that they can actually get such a specification into effect.

Even our quite strict TUEV wouldn't use other emission standards as those from the car's first registration year. I also believe, that they cannot dictate otherwise for legal reasons.

Goaty Bill

1,779 posts

152 months

Sunday 13th April 2014
quotequote all

NickM450

2,636 posts

201 months

Monday 14th April 2014
quotequote all
snorky said:
perhaps we come under this...

"All kit-cars and amateur built vehicles first used before 1 August 1998."



last year (and the one before actually) my MOT tester said - it is the same as a kit car - only test for visible smoke....PASS!
That's rather interesting. Why can't my MOT man be like that, I'll have a word smile

Were TVR's actually 'kit cars'? I thought they'd be low volume manufacturers? Either way, it leaves the rules open for interpretation.