new branch line, hitchin

Author
Discussion

truck71

Original Poster:

2,328 posts

172 months

Monday 14th April 2014
quotequote all
Just north of Hitchin on the ECML a new branch has appeared with a flyover to boot- what's that about?

Boatbuoy

1,941 posts

162 months

Monday 14th April 2014
quotequote all
It's the north bound flyover to the Cambridge line. Previously northbound trains to Cambridge on the slow line had to cross both fast lines via level points causing a bit of a timetable bottleneck. Southbound trains joining the ECML continue to use the old route as they do not have to cross any lines. New single track northbound route shown in red.


Tango13

8,427 posts

176 months

Monday 14th April 2014
quotequote all
I used to work up that way, there was a massive and highly illegal amphetamine sulphate factory by the motor factors!

truck71

Original Poster:

2,328 posts

172 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Boatbuoy said:
It's the north bound flyover to the Cambridge line. Previously northbound trains to Cambridge on the slow line had to cross both fast lines via level points causing a bit of a timetable bottleneck. Southbound trains joining the ECML continue to use the old route as they do not have to cross any lines. New single track northbound route shown in red.

Ahh, gotcha- thanks for that.

Ali Chappussy

876 posts

145 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
It's been there for quite a while now. Boatbouy is spot on!

woodypup59

614 posts

152 months

Friday 18th April 2014
quotequote all
It cost £ 180 million - all to shave 5 mins off the London to Cambridge trip.


Boatbuoy

1,941 posts

162 months

Friday 18th April 2014
quotequote all
Isn't it more about not obstructing the ECML? The fact that 5 minutes is saved is a by product. If you thought £180m was a lot, wait until the tackle the next bottleneck; Digswell viaduct.

Tango13

8,427 posts

176 months

Friday 18th April 2014
quotequote all
Boatbuoy said:
Isn't it more about not obstructing the ECML? The fact that 5 minutes is saved is a by product. If you thought £180m was a lot, wait until the tackle the next bottleneck; Digswell viaduct.
yes

http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/6397.aspx

As to the Digswell Viaduct it took 3yrs to build the original, I shudder to think how long the public enquiry will last nevermind the construction.