An update on non poaching agreements between companies
Discussion
Those of you who don’t follow competition law might not have noticed a huge US class action in which various tech companies are accused of anti-competitive practices by (in summary) agreeing not to poach each other’s employees. Two points:-
(a) this could have implications here, as it appears that some UK based agencies may have been involved; and
(b) this highlights a potentially broader issue, namely that employment settlements which involve companies agreeing not to poach etc are potentially unlawful under EU or English competition law.
Whether this is so remains to be seen, but I mention it as many here work in tech sectors where such agreements are not uncommon.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB100014240527...
DRAT: typo in thread title. I wonder why PH does not allow non Mods to edit titles?
(a) this could have implications here, as it appears that some UK based agencies may have been involved; and
(b) this highlights a potentially broader issue, namely that employment settlements which involve companies agreeing not to poach etc are potentially unlawful under EU or English competition law.
Whether this is so remains to be seen, but I mention it as many here work in tech sectors where such agreements are not uncommon.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB100014240527...
DRAT: typo in thread title. I wonder why PH does not allow non Mods to edit titles?
This surfaced quite a while back when some internal Apple emails were leaked IIRC. If I remember correctly (may have been 2+ years now), a Hiring Manager got an absolute bking from someone very senior for even contacting a Google employee. Pretty rotten for engineers employed by them anyway.
Yep, BBC article here with a few details - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27137464
Gassing Station | Jobs & Employment Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff