ebola, anyone else mildly terrified?

ebola, anyone else mildly terrified?

Author
Discussion

superkartracer

8,959 posts

222 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
Brill news indeed

superkartracer

8,959 posts

222 months

Laurel Green

30,776 posts

232 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

170 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all
She looks much fitter for losing a few pounds!

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all
McWigglebum4th said:
vescaegg said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-30932578

At turning point now its reported clap
And mostly down to people like the british nurse who went over there and put their lifes on the line

If we had followed the sage advice of the wise ones then it would be killing a huge amount in africa and instead of one or 2 cases in europe it would be hundreds


So those that wanted the UK nurse left to die in africa you should be ashamed
Who said that then?


There is no doubt this whole affair coils have been handled more effectively and safely, anyone who commented on that made quote fair criticism, whatever the holier than thou do gooders think. If it was safe and right for her to return to the UK as she did, there should have been no need for the palaver that accompanied her hasty transfer from Scotland to England.

The African situation could be managed just as effectively with NO risk to Europe or the rest of the world.

Ali G

3,526 posts

282 months

Bill

52,695 posts

255 months

Sunday 25th January 2015
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
The African situation could be managed just as effectively with NO risk to Europe or the rest of the world.
Just as it is being.

soad

32,882 posts

176 months

Sunday 25th January 2015
quotequote all
Ali G said:
"Ms Cafferkey was treated with blood plasma from an Ebola survivor and an experimental treatment drug closely related drug to ZMapp".


TTmonkey

20,911 posts

247 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Scientists have confirmed that Ebola has mutated.

Tests are being done to see if this makes it easier to transmit.

Could see this back on the radar if the change is significant.....

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

170 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Also reports of asymptomatic cases.......... be afraid.

Muncher

12,219 posts

249 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
But the number of new cases is now at the lowest level since the outbreak began apparently

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
TTmonkey said:
Scientists have confirmed that Ebola has mutated.

Bill

52,695 posts

255 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Also reports of asymptomatic cases.......... be afraid.
Huh? By asymptomatic do you mean people have been exposed and fought it off then this is a good thing, no?

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Bill said:
Huh? By asymptomatic do you mean people have been exposed and fought it off then this is a good thing, no?
I thought it meant a symptomless carrier?

vescaegg

25,529 posts

167 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
I thought it meant a symptomless carrier?
I thought that was the case now until you pretty much keel over and start bleeding from everywhere?

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
vescaegg said:
I thought that was the case now until you pretty much keel over and start bleeding from everywhere?
I think with regular Ebola you're most infectious at the end when you start to bleed out. You die shortly afterwards so the window for passing the virus is quite small. If you can walk around oblivious and infected indefinitely whilst being capable of transmitting the disease you can do a whole heap more damage to a population.

soad

32,882 posts

176 months

otolith

56,038 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
The question is whether significant virus amplification occurs in asymptomatic infections. If there are people who are seropositive for Ebola without ever showing any symptoms it could mean that they have been infected and infectious but asymptomatic, or it could mean that they were exposed, generated an immune response and fought it off without ever getting sick.

This letter to the Lancet assumes the latter;

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/P...

I'd like to know what the viral load is, if any, in these cases.

Bill

52,695 posts

255 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
I think with regular Ebola you're most infectious at the end when you start to bleed out. You die shortly afterwards so the window for passing the virus is quite small. If you can walk around oblivious and infected indefinitely whilst being capable of transmitting the disease you can do a whole heap more damage to a population.
But that's where the virus fails as a pandemic contagion, it needs contact between fluids and someone's mucus membranes and the fluids element doesn't happen until you're highly symptomatic.

otolith

56,038 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
I could easily see a less-lethal Ebola evolving into an STD.