Fingers crossed...

Fingers crossed...

Author
Discussion

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Wednesday 16th July 2014
quotequote all
Well dropped the 420SE off at David Gerald's for a full service, change the fuel lines and give her a good check over

Fingers crossed nothing pops up but glad she'll be full minty and ready for blatting yeah :-)

adam quantrill

11,538 posts

242 months

Wednesday 16th July 2014
quotequote all
... apart from the headlights that is....

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Wednesday 16th July 2014
quotequote all
adam quantrill said:
... apart from the headlights that is....
Boom boom lol

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Just had "the call"

few odds and sods like a ball joint and a tie bar bush so nothing major

Main issue is the fueling......massively over fueling......circa 2000 reading on emissions which is sapping power and effecting the running (vs the 500 limit for the MOT pass). The AFM has been opened at some point, so it stands a good chance it's knackered.

They are going to swap in a new normal AFM to see if that helps the fueling and call me back

The straight through exhaust is not helping the power as the lack of back pressure.........may lump for a silencer back in then sooner rather than later

Will keep you posted


Jack Valiant

1,894 posts

236 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
RV8's need very little back pressure so I would not worry about that, unless your ears are bleeding on a decent run! AFM and or the temp sensor... yours flapper or Hotwire?

Chris

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Jack Valiant said:
RV8's need very little back pressure so I would not worry about that, unless your ears are bleeding on a decent run! AFM and or the temp sensor... yours flapper or Hotwire?

Chris
Yes ears do bleed lol and its a Flapper

Jack Valiant

1,894 posts

236 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
The flappers do not do well if fiddled with especially by screw driver merchants or ill informed MoT testers (if in doubt wind in the AFM screw!) If you have the jag one on, one must assume that they may have done the injector mod i.e. more air + more fuel = bigger bang. If you have the standard black top injectors then the swap back to a standard SD1 or Range Rover AFM should be fine in the interim but I would get the car on the rollers with someone who knows the RV8 EFi and get it set up properly with a in line AFR and wide band lambda yes

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Bobby Shaftoe said:
Is it massively overfuelling just at idle (ie the only thing that's measured CO wise on the MOT) or everywhere including full throttle and part/cruise throttle? Tis important to find this out as the potential solution differs.
Idle

adam quantrill

11,538 posts

242 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
If it's just idle fuelling then that won't necessarily affect the rest of the rev range - as said above - it might be OK at reasonable throttle openings, and WOT is the most important for max power - it may well be spot on.

To adjust the idle CO you need to look at only the throttle gap on "shut", the bypass screw in the AFM, and the idle speed (and double-check the engine temperature sensor).

Easiest way to get it to pass is raise the idle to 1200 (you are allowed 1500) and then if needed adjust the bypass (allen key) to bring down the CO to 2% or maybe a little lower.

What you do after the MoT is your own affair....

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
adam quantrill said:
If it's just idle fuelling then that won't necessarily affect the rest of the rev range - as said above - it might be OK at reasonable throttle openings, and WOT is the most important for max power - it may well be spot on.

To adjust the idle CO you need to look at only the throttle gap on "shut", the bypass screw in the AFM, and the idle speed (and double-check the engine temperature sensor).

Easiest way to get it to pass is raise the idle to 1200 (you are allowed 1500) and then if needed adjust the bypass (allen key) to bring down the CO to 2% or maybe a little lower.

What you do after the MoT is your own affair....
Interesting, idle was set at 1200

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Bobby Shaftoe said:
I would have presumed, being a TVR specialist, that David Geralds would have already tried to adjust the Idle CO AFM screw as part of the full service.

You can take the idle CO screw all the way out for maximum effect, i used to do it on L-jet equipped Pug 205 gti's to get them through the mot.

If it is the car i'm thinking of, the H234 camshaft it's running has a stload of overlap, making the emissions situation worse.

Edited by Bobby Shaftoe on Thursday 17th July 20:11
I bloody hell hope so lol

adam quantrill

11,538 posts

242 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
1200 rpm already - in that case you might need some extra bypass. This can be achieved by trapping a small pipe - around 5mm-8mm dia - between the AFM and its outlet pipe. You can take it out after the test.

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
adam quantrill said:
1200 rpm already - in that case you might need some extra bypass. This can be achieved by trapping a small pipe - around 5mm-8mm dia - between the AFM and its outlet pipe. You can take it out after the test.
the plan was to get it all serviced / address and issues then get Mark Adams to set her up.....when I look through the cars history there are so many receipts about "look at poor running"

when giving the old girl the beans she really does move so I feel its been set up back in the day for WOT type running vs pottering around / low revs etc

KKson

3,402 posts

125 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Glen, whatever you do, do NOT start taking it apart and strip it to its component pieces, please!

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Friday 18th July 2014
quotequote all
Bobby Shaftoe said:
Lol, ditto the above!

You've essentially got a semi race engine in there. The Kent H234 cam needs loads of timing at idle, which then reduces at low rpm and then piles back again, essentially a V-shaped timing curve- but a dizzy can't do that.

You also need a rich idle, but probably not as rich as you have at the moment, for comparison my idle was 13.7:1 afr and 792ppm Hydrocarbons for the mot (and i'vew since leaned it out), 2000ppm is insane.

I suspect you have a standard ecu with the fuel pressure turned up to provide ~300bhp's worth of fuel. The lucas 4cu ecu is not mapable so you'll probably need to live with a rich idle as a consequence. Try removing the idle CO screw completely first.

There are a few solutions if this is the case, the easiest being a rovertec adjustable ecu which has two adjustable pots, one sets cruise & idle mixture, the other sets WOT fuelling. I had one of these on my car and it's not a bad solution.

The best (but not easiest) option is fully mapable fuelling and ignition like emerald, omex, megasquirt ect. This isn't an easy route but probably cheaper and more effective than paying for mark adams' time. He won't be able to do a great deal with a stock ecu at any rate.

The third option is to put a milder cam in it, but that would be quite frankly the girly thing to do.

Edited by Bobby Shaftoe on Thursday 17th July 23:37
DG have spoken with Mark Adams now for advice

Car is now all done but its my call on what to do ref the AFM etc........as a last ditch attempt they are putting in a new ECU and AFM to see what if anything that will do

Mark mentioned the original EUC can drift out given the age of the car if its original still.......one option is to send him the ECU an AFM to test them (not that expensive) but it means more time without the car

in short the car runs and goes well............just running rich

so I have time to noodle what direction to go in

NB1 I will not be stripping this, I love it
NB2 Defo keeping this cam, I like the high end power, suits my driving style
NB3 Both seat frames turned out to be goosed - another job to be fixed lol

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Friday 18th July 2014
quotequote all
well that was quick...........ok, with the new ECU and new normal AFM made a massive different to running, more responsive, way better emission

so just need to decide what to do..........clearly I'd like to have a new jag afm vs a new normal one but they are rocking horse doo doo


mrzigazaga

18,552 posts

165 months

Friday 18th July 2014
quotequote all
gmw9666 said:
I'd like to have a new jag afm vs a new normal one but they are rocking horse doo doo
Hi Glen...They do come up from time to time...There is a long number on the top of the black plastic, I believe that is a part number.

Also make sure they are the same AM....There are 2AM..3AM...5AM

Alternatively there are people who repair them...As i understand it they are tuned to the ECU in the car so using one from another is not always good.

Cheers....Ziga

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Friday 18th July 2014
quotequote all
mrzigazaga said:
Hi Glen...They do come up from time to time...There is a long number on the top of the black plastic, I believe that is a part number.

Also make sure they are the same AM....There are 2AM..3AM...5AM

Alternatively there are people who repair them...As i understand it they are tuned to the ECU in the car so using one from another is not always good.

Cheers....Ziga
that is also what I heard........the AFM is stickerless ie someones had it open before

The "DG / Mark Adams" theory is = ECU has drifted out or is not 100%.........AFM was then bastardised to compensate.......meaning AFM is now in need repair also

Have left Mark a message as if he can test / repair both items then bingo :-)

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Friday 18th July 2014
quotequote all
What a great job DG have done with the 420, very pleased

Full on 12k service and all fluids changes and changed all the fuels lines for me plus a few bushes and ball joi Ta

Still got the AFM / ecu issue who h I knew about so waiting on mark Adams for a test and fix price then I recon she will be minty minty

The guys at DG were very impressed with the car, especially the chassis which is great to hear :-)

All in all a good day :-)

gmw9666

Original Poster:

2,734 posts

200 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
gmw9666 said:
Have left Mark a message as if he can test / repair both items then bingo :-)
Well managed to chat to MA.........top chap.........so taken the AFM and ECU and will send to him for a testing to see what's what

Thought I'd share my AFM stats just incase anyone cares lol (please note the measurements are taken with a tape measure so will not be 100%)

Never noticed the Plenum is stamped NCK with Internal Diameter (ID) of 72mm and Outside Diameter (OD) is 80mm

The inlet end of the AFM is ID of 66mm and OD of 69mm

The outlet end of the AFM is ID of 75mm and OD of 78mm

So the weird thing I noticed was the inlet and outlet are different sizes........and the inlet, it has a bloody great gap on the underside of the hose connector which sure would let un filtered air into the AFM???

Looks dodge so glad its being sorted once and for all :-)