Commuting v cars - is it really worth it?

Commuting v cars - is it really worth it?

Author
Discussion

S10GTA

12,678 posts

167 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
hora said:
We all thing cycling equals fitness and health benefits but with more and more diesel cars on our roads (and people blanking off EGR's or just plain old faulty and probably will fail its next mot on emissions)....is it worth cycling on the road in peak commuting hour(s)?

The fumes sit at the right height to be breathed in and lets face it- you are breathing in slightly more than usual when your pedalling along as opposed to walking.

I avoid cycle-commute now as you can smell the bloody stuff. Cycling past stationery/crawling jams/slow moving cars or free flowing traffic is great but is it royally fking up your health.

Diesel fumes etc = carcinogenic right? Plus other health/lung issues?


Whats my point? Is it really worth it- commuting by bike? You get st from drivers, run over by drivers and ingest crap. Safer to ride off-peak or off-road IMO. A fair thought?

Edited by hora on Wednesday 23 July 09:29
I expect the potential negatives you list above are far outweighed by the positive health benefits riding gives.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
If I was cycling along heavily trafficed roads at rush hour then I might take the same view. Luckily however my commute is along an unregistered back road.


otolith

56,121 posts

204 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
The thing about using a bike to commute is that you get the exercise "free" in time when you would otherwise be sat on your arse. If you do a lot of cycling anyway, the health benefit is probably negligible and maybe the exposure to fumes is proportionally a significant risk. If you don't, and you don't otherwise have time to exercise, I think you must be doing more good than harm.

Batfink

1,032 posts

258 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I once saw a programme on TV that said fumes inside a car in traffic was a lot worse than outside so I think its still beneficial.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Batfink said:
I once saw a programme on TV that said fumes inside a car in traffic was a lot worse than outside so I think its still beneficial.
Given that cars suck in air from outside and they are an enclosed space with restricted air circulation then I'd imagine this is the case. I wonder how good pollen/cabin filters are are removing diesel particulates?

otolith

56,121 posts

204 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Your respiration rate is going to be a lot lower sat in a car, though.

Gruffy

7,212 posts

259 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I remember reading something a few years back that pollution masks were unnecessary for cyclists as the impact of riding in fumes was negligible. Hard to accept when you're faced with Black Bogie Syndrome but although I can't remember the source I do remember thinking it was a legitimate one.

S10GTA

12,678 posts

167 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
otolith said:
Your respiration rate is going to be a lot lower sat in a car, though.
Depends how fit you are wink

bakerstreet

4,763 posts

165 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I save £5.89 per day by cycling to work and loose a bit of excess weight in the process, so I'd say that the benefits outweigh the negatives smile

Steve vRS

4,845 posts

241 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I am so lucky in that my commute is along Cheshire country lanes.

Steve

TwistingMyMelon

6,385 posts

205 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
OP - not all of us commuters live in cities & towns, 40% of my commute is on paths/roads where there are no cars, or maybe one every few minutes

There is one hill on mine , that goes from a 30-national limit and you do notice the fumes, diesels being the worst and I do sometimes think, this can't be great, especially as my lungs are going flat out up the climb. Winter is worse, when engines are running rich. I good avoid this hill, but it would add 5 minutes onto the commute and, but I'm normally running late!

Theres a variety of reasons I commute in, as others have said, bar the enjoyment and fitness I like saving the cost, its cost me about £7 to drive in, which is dead money 7 x 3 = 21 x 45 weeks a year = £945 a year I save on driving in. My drive in is actually quite a nice & easy drive, but its still "dead" money.

Emeye

9,773 posts

223 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I'd be more worried about the the impact to your health of being knocked off in heavy traffic. Along with the taste of pollution, it's the main reason I have always avoided riding on the roads, but I am lucky enough to live on the edge of the Pennines. Not that I've ridden my bike at all for over 3 years as I'm way too busy! Lol

otolith

56,121 posts

204 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
S10GTA said:
otolith said:
Your respiration rate is going to be a lot lower sat in a car, though.
Depends how fit you are wink
You'd need a pretty bloody high metabolic rate to be using more oxygen sat still than a bloke on a bike!

You might have a very efficient set of heart and lungs on you, giving a relatively low rate of breathing and pulse for the level of energy you are expending, but you're still getting that oxygen into you and presumably whatever other crap it comes in with.

donfisher

793 posts

166 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
The odd day a week here and there on the tube is enough to convince me that riding in is the better choice. And that’s all year round, the tube is never nice but especially bad in this sort of weather. The £25 a week saving is a nice bonus as well.

Saying that apart from a few early mornings and late evenings my commute is a chore rather than a pleasant experience. If it wasn’t for the fact that I’d rather spend the money on a better normal bike I’d get an electrically assisted one to help smooth it out. The exercise when I started was welcome but just going there and back now doesn’t do that much, I wonder if it would be better to save my legs for the weekends?

Ideally I’d have between 10 and 15 miles to do on rural roads. Doing less than 10 miles within zone three is boring and tiresome.

Back to the original point. I get in as early as possible to avoid the traffic so don’t notice the fumes much. On the way home I end up holding my breath sometimes when going through a cloud of soot from a clapped out cab or van with a knackered DPF.

Poorly mapped motorbikes and scooters seem to give out the most noxious stuff when stood in a queue, it could just be that it’s easier to smell though.

S10GTA

12,678 posts

167 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
TwistingMyMelon said:
Theres a variety of reasons I commute in, as others have said, bar the enjoyment and fitness I like saving the cost, its cost me about £7 to drive in, which is dead money 7 x 3 = 21 x 45 weeks a year = £945 a year I save on driving in. My drive in is actually quite a nice & easy drive, but its still "dead" money.
Agreed. My saving is £5.24 per day, so if I ride in everyday in a year I will save £1257.60.....

But I spend it all on bikes...

GarryDK

5,670 posts

158 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I'd say around 10% of my commute is moving through stationary traffic, vertually none in the mornings. I guess it depends on your commute.

aclivity

4,072 posts

188 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
many many years ago, Bicycle magazine did a test of people walking, cycling, in buses and in cars for a journey - it wasn't far, maybe a couple of miles at most. They found that cyclists had the least amount of "stuff" (can't recall whatever they were testing!) after the route. So even if you do inhale more stuff, the fact that you are active on the roads means that you will expel it almost immediately?

Of course, this was years ago and may have been testing for fairy dust or lead particles, so may or may not be useful!

Fotic

719 posts

129 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
aclivity said:
So even if you do inhale more stuff, the fact that you are active on the roads means that you will expel it almost immediately?
I'm not sure pollutants work like that.

NB I am not a toxicologist.

ndg

560 posts

237 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
aclivity said:
So even if you do inhale more stuff, the fact that you are active on the roads means that you will expel it almost immediately?
You are in the 'bad' atmosphere for a shorter duration though (if an urban commute). Like others my commute is 25mins of leafy open roads and 5mins of traffic, so I'm not going to worry.

Soop Dogg

411 posts

235 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
This is part of my commute in rush hour. I'll keep riding my bike, thanks!