US journalist beheaded by ISIS...

US journalist beheaded by ISIS...

Author
Discussion

smegmore

3,091 posts

176 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
lord trumpton said:
Now the UK has started bombing IS I fear that the next british hostage will be on YouTube anytime soon frown
Sadly, yes.


frown

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
lord trumpton said:
Now the UK has started bombing IS I fear that the next british hostage will be on YouTube anytime soon frown
Inevitable, greater concern is how quickly their revenge is experienced in the UK.

TheRealFingers99

1,996 posts

128 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
smegmore said:
Bullst.

The only reason the Vietnam war ended early (?) was that the Americans with all their technology and firepower could never have hoped to defeat the general population of a country that regarded them as invaders, the majority of Viet Cong were from the south and aided and armed by North Vietnam/China.

The sole reason for the American involvement in Vietnam was to prop up a corrupt puppet government which was only marginally more palatable than the communist alternative, this was the cold war at its height.
I really think that the Americans -- and we're talking early Kennedy years, Bay of Pigs and all that -- thought it would be easy.

They had the weaponry, they simply believed they couldn't get the public to accept the number of body bags victory would entail. In a Democracy (well, a consenting oligarchy -- that's not unimportant).

There is never, I think, a simple, single, reason for engaging in a war, nor such a reason for a defeat or withdrawal.

I really doubt that anyone not alive at the time can fully appreciate just how galvanising the reportage from Vietnam -- the first real TV war -- was.

A Google for "vietnam war effects of journalism on" throws up some interesting stuff.

Still, if you think that reportage played no role, you've really got to find a reason for the West's insistence on embedding during later conflicts.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

231 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
lord trumpton said:
Now the UK has started bombing IS I fear that the next british hostage will be on YouTube anytime soon frown
What difference? They beheaded a Brit before you joined the bombing.

smegmore

3,091 posts

176 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
TheRealFingers99 said:
smegmore said:
Bullst.

The only reason the Vietnam war ended early (?) was that the Americans with all their technology and firepower could never have hoped to defeat the general population of a country that regarded them as invaders, the majority of Viet Cong were from the south and aided and armed by North Vietnam/China.

The sole reason for the American involvement in Vietnam was to prop up a corrupt puppet government which was only marginally more palatable than the communist alternative, this was the cold war at its height.
I really think that the Americans -- and we're talking early Kennedy years, Bay of Pigs and all that -- thought it would be easy.

They had the weaponry, they simply believed they couldn't get the public to accept the number of body bags victory would entail. In a Democracy (well, a consenting oligarchy -- that's not unimportant).

There is never, I think, a simple, single, reason for engaging in a war, nor such a reason for a defeat or withdrawal.

I really doubt that anyone not alive at the time can fully appreciate just how galvanising the reportage from Vietnam -- the first real TV war -- was.

A Google for "vietnam war effects of journalism on" throws up some interesting stuff.

Still, if you think that reportage played no role, you've really got to find a reason for the West's insistence on embedding during later conflicts.
The American bodybags were coming back in such large numbers was because the US government completely underestimated the resolve of the Vietnamese population to drive out the invaders.

Don't forget this was an insular (as in village life) agrarian economy which was easily mobilised by the guerrilla forces to resist the round eye invaders who were supporting the totally corrupt Saigon regime.

I accept that this was the first live TV war that turned many Americans away from the concept of 'better dead than red' due to the live pics on the teatime news of US soldiers being killed and terribly injured but the political realities remain.

This was a war which was engineered by the US in order to prevent the so-called spread of communism throughout Asia, for better or worse.

Forget the communist political angle but does that ring any bells in more recent history?

Think about it.

Mr_B

10,480 posts

243 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
Launched 2 of 6 jets. Both came back without finding any targets. Maybe sums up the fact the killing a bunch of nutters on the back of a Toyota pick-up ain't going to be nothing like the Gulf war.
Some how though this is making the streets of the UK safer...by encouraging more Muslims to pretend they are leaving Birmingham for a cheap sun and no sex holiday in Turkey, only to sneak over the border into Syria.
How about maybe dealing with the estimated 200 odd that have already supposedly returned from fighting, rather that buying million pound cruise missiles to lob at Iraq.

smegmore

3,091 posts

176 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
Mr_B said:
Launched 2 of 6 jets. Both came back without finding any targets. Maybe sums up the fact the killing a bunch of nutters on the back of a Toyota pick-up ain't going to be nothing like the Gulf war.
Some how though this is making the streets of the UK safer...by encouraging more Muslims to pretend they are leaving Birmingham for a cheap sun and no sex holiday in Turkey, only to sneak over the border into Syria.
How about maybe dealing with the estimated 200 odd that have already supposedly returned from fighting, rather that buying million pound cruise missiles to lob at Iraq.
Stable doors.

Horse.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

231 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
We need to worry less about bombing there and focus on the mad dogs festering this crap under our noses in the UK and US.

smegmore

3,091 posts

176 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
We need to worry less about bombing there and focus on the mad dogs festering this crap under our noses in the UK and US.
Yes indeed.

But, until we have poiticians who are more focused on the safety and wellbeing of our citizens rather than their own ratings popularity then we are on a loser.

There is too much emphasis on causing offence to the minorities witin our society which is clouding the real issues of the dangers in our midst.

Bbunter

122 posts

116 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
smegmore said:
Yes indeed.

But, until we have poiticians who are more focused on the safety and wellbeing of our citizens rather than their own ratings popularity then we are on a loser.

There is too much emphasis on causing offence to the minorities witin our society which is clouding the real issues of the dangers in our midst.
The politicians are giving the reach around to the institutions that are developing weapons tech, and they in turn, are giving the reach around to the arms dealers / defence companies. There's nothing like a good conflict / war, to line the pockets of the pigs round the trough.

TinyCappo

2,106 posts

153 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
Mr_B said:
Launched 2 of 6 jets. Both came back without finding any targets. Maybe sums up the fact the killing a bunch of nutters on the back of a Toyota pick-up ain't going to be nothing like the Gulf war.
Some how though this is making the streets of the UK safer...by encouraging more Muslims to pretend they are leaving Birmingham for a cheap sun and no sex holiday in Turkey, only to sneak over the border into Syria.
How about maybe dealing with the estimated 200 odd that have already supposedly returned from fighting, rather that buying million pound cruise missiles to lob at Iraq.
Really rolleyes? This if anything is a bonus to the decommissioning process for the Tonka force of the UK. Some of the more hazardous stuff can be dropped in Iraq instead of decommissioned over here saving the tax payer a hefty sum and anything that cant be dropped by the Eurofighter you can be damn sure will be dropped out there rather than stored and dismantled over here at great cost. Furthermore, Tonkas are built for this. High speed air to ground bombing is what they have been doing for over 20 years! Think we're using paveways and are definitely not cruise missiles.

Mr_B

10,480 posts

243 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
TinyCappo said:
Mr_B said:
Launched 2 of 6 jets. Both came back without finding any targets. Maybe sums up the fact the killing a bunch of nutters on the back of a Toyota pick-up ain't going to be nothing like the Gulf war.
Some how though this is making the streets of the UK safer...by encouraging more Muslims to pretend they are leaving Birmingham for a cheap sun and no sex holiday in Turkey, only to sneak over the border into Syria.
How about maybe dealing with the estimated 200 odd that have already supposedly returned from fighting, rather that buying million pound cruise missiles to lob at Iraq.
Really rolleyes? This if anything is a bonus to the decommissioning process for the Tonka force of the UK. Some of the more hazardous stuff can be dropped in Iraq instead of decommissioned over here saving the tax payer a hefty sum and anything that cant be dropped by the Eurofighter you can be damn sure will be dropped out there rather than stored and dismantled over here at great cost. Furthermore, Tonkas are built for this. High speed air to ground bombing is what they have been doing for over 20 years! Think we're using paveways and are definitely not cruise missiles.
From the Telegraph 'Britain is buying 20 more of the missiles for a total of £17 million in a deal signed this week as the Navy replenishes its stocks'.
Maybe coincidence, or maybe we'll see the Navy lobbing a few missiles to show how much we support the US.


TinyCappo

2,106 posts

153 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Mr_B said:
TinyCappo said:
Mr_B said:
Launched 2 of 6 jets. Both came back without finding any targets. Maybe sums up the fact the killing a bunch of nutters on the back of a Toyota pick-up ain't going to be nothing like the Gulf war.
Some how though this is making the streets of the UK safer...by encouraging more Muslims to pretend they are leaving Birmingham for a cheap sun and no sex holiday in Turkey, only to sneak over the border into Syria.
How about maybe dealing with the estimated 200 odd that have already supposedly returned from fighting, rather that buying million pound cruise missiles to lob at Iraq.
Really rolleyes? This if anything is a bonus to the decommissioning process for the Tonka force of the UK. Some of the more hazardous stuff can be dropped in Iraq instead of decommissioned over here saving the tax payer a hefty sum and anything that cant be dropped by the Eurofighter you can be damn sure will be dropped out there rather than stored and dismantled over here at great cost. Furthermore, Tonkas are built for this. High speed air to ground bombing is what they have been doing for over 20 years! Think we're using paveways and are definitely not cruise missiles.
From the Telegraph 'Britain is buying 20 more of the missiles for a total of £17?million in a deal signed this week as the Navy replenishes its stocks'.
Maybe coincidence, or maybe we'll see the Navy lobbing a few missiles to show how much we support the US.
Coincidence much in the same way house prices were included in that Ealing beheading media coverage. The mandate from parliament I didn't think included the use of such weaponry. Reason being the first round of tonkas came back still fully loaded and that was with at best a 20 second delay between target acquired and impact. Cruise missiles launched from the gulf would take far longer to reach their target in comparison.

Mr_B

10,480 posts

243 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
TinyCappo said:
Mr_B said:
TinyCappo said:
Mr_B said:
Launched 2 of 6 jets. Both came back without finding any targets. Maybe sums up the fact the killing a bunch of nutters on the back of a Toyota pick-up ain't going to be nothing like the Gulf war.
Some how though this is making the streets of the UK safer...by encouraging more Muslims to pretend they are leaving Birmingham for a cheap sun and no sex holiday in Turkey, only to sneak over the border into Syria.
How about maybe dealing with the estimated 200 odd that have already supposedly returned from fighting, rather that buying million pound cruise missiles to lob at Iraq.
Really rolleyes? This if anything is a bonus to the decommissioning process for the Tonka force of the UK. Some of the more hazardous stuff can be dropped in Iraq instead of decommissioned over here saving the tax payer a hefty sum and anything that cant be dropped by the Eurofighter you can be damn sure will be dropped out there rather than stored and dismantled over here at great cost. Furthermore, Tonkas are built for this. High speed air to ground bombing is what they have been doing for over 20 years! Think we're using paveways and are definitely not cruise missiles.
From the Telegraph 'Britain is buying 20 more of the missiles for a total of £17?million in a deal signed this week as the Navy replenishes its stocks'.
Maybe coincidence, or maybe we'll see the Navy lobbing a few missiles to show how much we support the US.
Coincidence much in the same way house prices were included in that Ealing beheading media coverage. The mandate from parliament I didn't think included the use of such weaponry. Reason being the first round of tonkas came back still fully loaded and that was with at best a 20 second delay between target acquired and impact. Cruise missiles launched from the gulf would take far longer to reach their target in comparison.

Strange coincidence we buy 20 the week we go to war. Then again, lets see if the Navy doesn't make some use of them.
The US managed to fire quite a few the other day. Would suggest the fixed targets are ( or were) there to use, not that I heard anything about not using them. When did Parliament list details about whats in and whats out weapons wise ?

2013BRM

39,731 posts

284 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
We need to worry less about bombing there and focus on the mad dogs festering this crap under our noses in the UK and US.
I see this reaction everywhere, from the daily rags to facebook, our politicians are so out of touch that they don't even give a st any more.

King Herald

23,501 posts

216 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
TheRealFingers99 said:
They had the weaponry, they simply believed they couldn't get the public to accept the number of body bags victory would entail. In a Democracy (well, a consenting oligarchy -- that's not unimportant).
US deaths numbered approx 55,000 total, in Vietnam. Compared to the 27,000 DAILY average in WW2, it is a mere drop in the ocean, just two days worth of casualties......

The difference was that in Vietnam, for the first time ever, the great unwashed could see, hear and feel the agony via the medium of television, courtesy of news reporters. That was how Vietnam differed from all previous conflicts.

photosnob

1,339 posts

118 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
King Herald said:
US deaths numbered approx 55,000 total, in Vietnam. Compared to the 27,000 DAILY average in WW2, it is a mere drop in the ocean, just two days worth of casualties......

The difference was that in Vietnam, for the first time ever, the great unwashed could see, hear and feel the agony via the medium of television, courtesy of news reporters. That was how Vietnam differed from all previous conflicts.
I'm sure the USA would have surrendered or negotiated peace with Hitler if they has video journalists...

Transmitter Man

4,253 posts

224 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Mr_B said:
Launched 2 of 6 jets. Both came back without finding any targets. Maybe sums up the fact the killing a bunch of nutters on the back of a Toyota pick-up ain't going to be nothing like the Gulf war.
Some how though this is making the streets of the UK safer...by encouraging more Muslims to pretend they are leaving Birmingham for a cheap sun and no sex holiday in Turkey, only to sneak over the border into Syria.
How about maybe dealing with the estimated 200 odd that have already supposedly returned from fighting, rather that buying million pound cruise missiles to lob at Iraq.
Wrong, best case scenario is they meet their maker where they believe 72 virgins will be waiting.

What nobody told them is that they're virgin goats.

Foppo

2,344 posts

124 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
I remember the Vietnam war one of these wars which was never going to be won by the Yanks.

That is why the French got out,it kept the military complex going like it always does.War is money and there is plenty to be made,never mind the casualties.

Now we have a ever lasting war against terrorism some of our towns are full of moslims who problaby hate our guts.Nice future to look forward to.

MrBrightSi

2,912 posts

170 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
King Herald said:
US deaths numbered approx 55,000 total, in Vietnam. Compared to the 27,000 DAILY average in WW2, it is a mere drop in the ocean, just two days worth of casualties......

The difference was that in Vietnam, for the first time ever, the great unwashed could see, hear and feel the agony via the medium of television, courtesy of news reporters. That was how Vietnam differed from all previous conflicts.
+1

Go check youtube for footage from iraq, afghan and the other theatres such as mali and you will see up close and personal the wars fought.

Go deeper into the internets and you'll find the horror in syria and what not very very fast, if anyone thinks the people who are joining ISIS think it's all like COD are a bit naive.