muse

Author
Discussion

davidd

Original Poster:

6,449 posts

284 months

Saturday 6th September 2014
quotequote all
I'm watching them on sky at the mo.. that Bellamy chap is handy (if up himself).

I always thought they were good, but watching him run about whilst playing note perfect and singing... its like Prince meets metal..


Fantuzzi

3,297 posts

146 months

Saturday 6th September 2014
quotequote all
davidd said:
I'm watching them on sky at the mo.. that Bellamy chap is handy (if up himself).

I always thought they were good, but watching him run about whilst playing note perfect and singing... its like Prince meets metal..
I keep hearing people say he's a good guitarist but never heard anything that's proved that, any tracks where he 'shreds it up' to use the vernacular...

Asterix

24,438 posts

228 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
Seriously good live band.

...and 'up' Kate Hudson hehe

Driller

8,310 posts

278 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
Fantuzzi said:
I keep hearing people say he's a good guitarist but never heard anything that's proved that, any tracks where he 'shreds it up' to use the vernacular...
He's definitely not a shredder that's for sure but most folk can't tell the difference I suppose. Great band though and very good live as already mentioned.

davidd

Original Poster:

6,449 posts

284 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
shredding shmedding smile

Fantuzzi

3,297 posts

146 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
davidd said:
shredding shmedding smile
It not that I think being a 'good' guitarists is just about lead technique, and this coming from a gratuitous shred monkey, more that I've heard him described as a gnarly neo classical player by some, but never heard him do any lead stuff of that style in his songs, so thought perhaps I'm missing some of his best work.

My brother loved them live, and whilst they're not really up my street I've heard bits through his wall that sounded better than the hits I've heard.

davidd

Original Poster:

6,449 posts

284 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
Fantuzzi said:
It not that I think being a 'good' guitarists is just about lead technique, and this coming from a gratuitous shred monkey, more that I've heard him described as a gnarly neo classical player by some, but never heard him do any lead stuff of that style in his songs, so thought perhaps I'm missing some of his best work.

My brother loved them live, and whilst they're not really up my street I've heard bits through his wall that sounded better than the hits I've heard.
That's fair. There is an element of pomp to them that I don't like but I can't help but admire.

Billsnemesis

817 posts

237 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
Check this out - Invincible, with some amazing two handed stuff which he does live in ever more extravagant versions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_5V8We3hgg

I play guitar to a reasonable standard and I have no idea how he is doing this stuff

Mojooo

12,707 posts

180 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
He sues quite a lot of effects

Which ain;t necessarily a bad thing. I think I saw on some cover versions the effects tool is right where the pickup is on the guitar.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

149 months

Monday 8th September 2014
quotequote all
davidd said:
shredding shmedding smile
yes An ounce of soul is worth a ton of technique.

And he looks like Roland rat.

Mojooo

12,707 posts

180 months

Monday 8th September 2014
quotequote all
I think their music does have some soul but there are 2 issues

it all sounds very electronicy/shreddy

and the signers voice is quite high pitched

both of which probably give it sound that is quite different to what one might consider a mroe emotional type of music.

Fantuzzi

3,297 posts

146 months

Monday 8th September 2014
quotequote all
Billsnemesis said:
Check this out - Invincible, with some amazing two handed stuff which he does live in ever more extravagant versions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_5V8We3hgg

I play guitar to a reasonable standard and I have no idea how he is doing this stuff
I think your ears are being bamboozled by the crazy whammy pedal effect!

The high notes are tapped then he is hammering/pulling off then ascending that pattern.

Something like 12(t)......4(7)(4)(7)(4)(7)(4).....14(t).......4(7)(4)(7)......15(t).......4(7)(4)(7)......17(t)

The whammy pedal gives it that rather awesome synthy tone. Its the same effects pedal used in the Rage against the Machine song Killing in the name of solo.


Justin Cyder said:
yes An ounce of soul is worth a ton of technique.
Technique is contextual, one of Jeff Becks albums in the early 70s was criticised to basically being a show off shred album in period. Something you couldn't imagine someone saying these days about him, as he's normally seen as one of kings of soulful playing and sensitivity!

franki68

10,380 posts

221 months

Monday 8th September 2014
quotequote all
Fantuzzi said:
I keep hearing people say he's a good guitarist but never heard anything that's proved that, any tracks where he 'shreds it up' to use the vernacular...
hard to walk into a guitar store without a muse riff being played,and he was voted the top guitar hero of the last 20 years or something by total guitar readers ,so he is hugely influential.Depends on how ones classifies a great guitarist I suppose.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

149 months

Monday 8th September 2014
quotequote all
And yet I would argue day & night that Graham Coxon who possesses half of Matt Bellamys technique is twice as inventive & has left a much richer legacy than anything Muse ever committed to record.

These things are subjective as ever, in my experience any riff being played by spotty yoofs in music shops is to be avoided at all costs, particularly if it involves anything by the premier purveyors of paranoid pomp rock.

franki68

10,380 posts

221 months

Tuesday 9th September 2014
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
And yet I would argue day & night that Graham Coxon who possesses half of Matt Bellamys technique is twice as inventive & has left a much richer legacy than anything Muse ever committed to record.

These things are subjective as ever, in my experience any riff being played by spotty yoofs in music shops is to be avoided at all costs, particularly if it involves anything by the premier purveyors of paranoid pomp rock.
depends on how you define influence,and whether you are judging on a personal level or a global level.To me influence is inspiring people to pick up an instrument ,or creating something new that everyone copies ,not sure coxon as impressive a guitarist as he is falls into either category.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

149 months

Tuesday 9th September 2014
quotequote all
The act of writing a song is creating something new. If however, the argument is creating new techniques that 'everyone' copies, then Matt Bellamy fails to make the category either. And I very much doubt Muse will hold out any great cultural legacy in twenty years time, whereas Blur of course, have already managed that through a combination of lyrical dexterity, angular memorable riffs and a highly developed sense of Englishness. USP's aplenty.

Muse, though to be fair do a nice line in revolutionary rhetoric. Uprising for example, is so paranoid, it ends up with a certain left wing sixth form charm, but doesn't live long in the memory, sadly.

Crafty_

13,277 posts

200 months

Tuesday 9th September 2014
quotequote all
Really?

Muse may or may not take their place in history, but Blur ? Country House ? Boys & Girls ? Parklife ?

Just another pop band imho.


mat13

1,977 posts

181 months

Tuesday 9th September 2014
quotequote all
The bass line in hysteria is epic! I keep promising myself that one day ile sit down and spend a day mastering it.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

149 months

Tuesday 9th September 2014
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
Really?

Muse may or may not take their place in history, but Blur ? Country House ? Boys & Girls ? Parklife ?

Just another pop band imho.
Fair enough, the game is about opinions, even if you purposely pick the worst songs. I would have picked End of a century, this is a low, chemical world, the universal.



I have played in every toilet
But you still want to spoil it
To prove I’ve made a big mistake
Too long trying to resist it
You’ve just gone and missed it
It's escaped your world



Hmmm, toilet. Profound.

franki68

10,380 posts

221 months

Wednesday 10th September 2014
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
The act of writing a song is creating something new. If however, the argument is creating new techniques that 'everyone' copies, then Matt Bellamy fails to make the category either. And I very much doubt Muse will hold out any great cultural legacy in twenty years time, whereas Blur of course, have already managed that through a combination of lyrical dexterity, angular memorable riffs and a highly developed sense of Englishness. USP's aplenty.

Muse, though to be fair do a nice line in revolutionary rhetoric. Uprising for example, is so paranoid, it ends up with a certain left wing sixth form charm, but doesn't live long in the memory, sadly.
you misunderstand me,you are talking about your personal taste,the point I make is that is irrelevant.For example the beatles wouldnt make a list of my top 25 bands for example,but I would acknowledge that they are miles ahead of pretty much everyone in terms of influence.
the fact that you dont like/appreciate someones music doesnt stop it being influential or successful.

As another example coxon>gallagher as a guitarist,but in terms of influence gallagher > coxon ,he inspired thousands to take up the guitar ,I'm not sure I've ever heard/read anyone mention coxon as an influence on them tbh...aside from you wink