RE: BRM V16: Time For Tea?

RE: BRM V16: Time For Tea?

Monday 15th September 2014

BRM V16: Time For Tea?

16 cylinders, 1.5 litres and a supercharger; turn everything up as loud as possible



The above specification would sound frankly absurd in 2014 so the fact that the BRM V16 was raced in the 1950s makes it all the more extraordinary. So why is it not remembered as fondly as other F1 cars like the Maserati 250F? Reliability, unfortunately and predictably enough. It was too complex to work consistently and as such the full potential wasn't realised.

The V16's fragile nature continues to this day which explains why the Revival demonstration lap was at rather less than race pace. But there's still enough of that spellbinding noise to get very excited about. Long may it continue to be run and seen and heard at events in the future. As one of the commentators says, it represents "the epitome of British eccentricity in the world of motor racing". Terrific.

Enjoy the vid!

 

[Lead image: LAT]

Author
Discussion

fatboy69

Original Poster:

9,372 posts

187 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
That was ok however for a really awesome soundtrack of the V16 listen to the CD in Nick Masons book 'Into The Red'.

Nicks V16 was driven balls out & sounded epic. Much better than it sounded at Goodwood where it was not driven flat out - I can understand why!

Does anyone remember the day when three of them were run at the same time at Donington many many years ago?

That was a great noise.

pSyCoSiS

3,594 posts

205 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
Sounds lovely. Wish he had opened it up a little more often!

dvs_dave

8,624 posts

225 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
So what was the rationale for producing such a complex yet tiny capacity engine? The frictional losses alone must have been significant with all those moving parts.

proper

37 posts

171 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all

proper

37 posts

171 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
BTW: It's a BRM Type 15, powered by the BRM V16 engine.

Benbay001

5,795 posts

157 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
Sure its not a 15 liter?

soad

32,894 posts

176 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
Benbay001 said:
Sure its not a 15 liter?
"The British Racing Motors V16 was a supercharged 1.5 litre (90.8 cu in) V-16 cylinder racing engine built by British Racing Motors (BRM) for competing in Formula One motor racing. Designed in 1947 and raced until 1954–55, it produced 600 bhp (450 kW) at 12,000 rpm, although test figures from Rolls-Royce suggested that the engine would be able to be run at up to 14,000rpm."

soad

32,894 posts

176 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
So what was the rationale for producing such a complex yet tiny capacity engine? The frictional losses alone must have been significant with all those moving parts.
I would like to know the answer too. Anyone?

sideways man

1,315 posts

137 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
Please can someone do an edit to get rid of the commentary. It ruins the whole point of the video.

I agree ' Into the red' is a great soundtrack,a little less missfiring would have been nice,but we are talking about brm's most unreliable car here. And that is saying something.!

Willie Green did a piece for classic and sportscar,describing the driving experience of the v16. He said the tyres lived in a world of wheelspin,as power increased by circa 100 hp for every 1000rpm. So once you had spin,there was no way of stopping it,except back off. And it would spin its wheels at 140 mph. That is not a typo by the way.

Stirling Moss hated the car,probably because it had no finesse and didn't suit his delicate style. You couldn't balance it on the throttle,because of the peaky power delivery. Juan Manuel Fangio, however,loved the car. I always knew the man had good taste.

soad

32,894 posts

176 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
“The V16 was a thoroughly nasty car,” said Moss. “The brakes were OK, the acceleration was incredible – until you broke traction – but everything else I hated, particularly the steering and the driving position. Handling? I don’t remember it having any…”

sideways man

1,315 posts

137 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
soad said:
dvs_dave said:
So what was the rationale for producing such a complex yet tiny capacity engine? The frictional losses alone must have been significant with all those moving parts.
I would like to know the answer too. Anyone?
The capacity limits for f1 at the time were 4.5 litre unsupercharged or 1.5 supercharged. Power increases with rpm,so the obvious way to increase max rpm was by using small pistons for less rotating mass. Same reason ferrarri f1 engines were v12.

soad

32,894 posts

176 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
sideways man said:
The capacity limits for f1 at the time were 4.5 litre unsupercharged or 1.5 supercharged. Power increases with rpm,so the obvious way to increase max rpm was by using small pistons for less rotating mass. Same reason ferrarri f1 engines were v12.
Makes perfect sense, thanks. smile

team will

142 posts

237 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
For some REALLY MAD BRM driving, hear it on the public roads!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umO3iqac_4c

Spydaman

1,503 posts

258 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
Can that be real? Sounds fantastic but would anyone really drive a car like that on snowy wet roads?

Chris Stott

13,364 posts

197 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
One of the greatest sounding engines of all time.

m444ttb

3,160 posts

229 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
The V16 was the first car noise I heard as I entered the circuit gate yesterday. Only saw the car in person once sadly. It still sounded awesome even if it wasn't being thrashed to the limit.

the other me

613 posts

153 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
team will,

do you think that video is for real ? ? with all the "techniques" available these days ? rolleyes but if so, well WOW ! ! that is what I was waiting to hear on the Goodwood vid.

Have heard it twice years ago, at Goodwood & Silverstone even more "many moons ago" in a GP support race, both times being started/revved in the paddock. . .truly amazing noise, the hairs on my arms stand on end even now as your vid brings it back to me.

braddo

10,466 posts

188 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
team will said:
For some REALLY MAD BRM driving, hear it on the public roads!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umO3iqac_4c
I think a clue is in the video's name. It's the in-car sound clip from the Nick Mason book CD (also on the billzilla site above), overlaid onto a random video.

Spine-tingling noise!

Edited by braddo on Monday 15th September 21:14

AV8

363 posts

179 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
Saw one of them driven up the hill at the FOS 6 or 7 years ago. sounded pretty spectacular but Nick Masons one is the best I've ever heard.

matchmaker

8,490 posts

200 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
This is a V16



English Electric 16CSVT. 247 litre turbocharged and aftercooled diesel. 2700bhp @ 850rpm.