Soviet Turbojet Train

Author
Discussion

Sonic

Original Poster:

4,007 posts

207 months

Monday 29th September 2014
quotequote all
I've just been forwarded a link by a friend who's into this urban exploration with some great pictures and i thought a few people here might find them interesting.

A turbo jet train sounds like a blood fantastic idea to me biggrin

http://englishrussia.com/2014/05/26/abandoned-and-...

RyanOPlastry

752 posts

208 months

Monday 29th September 2014
quotequote all
APT-E had rover built gas turbines as power. Altogether a more satisfactory solution. Many other gas turbine powered locomotives were tried around the globe.

rs1952

5,247 posts

259 months

Monday 29th September 2014
quotequote all
RyanOPlastry said:
APT-E had rover built gas turbines as power. Altogether a more satisfactory solution. Many other gas turbine powered locomotives were tried around the globe.
Gas turbines (and steam turbines come to that) were also experimented with in the UK. They generally turned out to be less reliable and more expensive to run than conventional steam or diesel locomotives.

In case anybody is interested:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_GT3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_18000
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_18100
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LMS_Turbomotive

18000 is still in existence, although not in working order, at the Great Western Society at Didcot

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Monday 29th September 2014
quotequote all
Sonic said:
A turbo jet train sounds like a blood fantastic idea to me biggrin
Not if it passes your house in the middle of the night......smile

Simpo Two

85,355 posts

265 months

Monday 29th September 2014
quotequote all
RyanOPlastry said:
APT-E had rover built gas turbines as power. Altogether a more satisfactory solution. Many other gas turbine powered locomotives were tried around the globe.
Not quite the same as strapping two jets on the roof though!

scubadude

2,618 posts

197 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Not quite the same as strapping two jets on the roof though!
That soviet train is straight out of Thunderbirds, wonderfully bizarre design in typical mil-spec Soviet blue, for pure 60's sci-fi perfection all it needs is to be on a underwater monorail :-)

maffski

1,868 posts

159 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all

tight5

2,747 posts

159 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
train can't go in reverse direction .
spectacular noise in the coach .
fuel tank full of jet fuel .
seems like a bloody daft idea to me ( unless it's just for research ) .

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
tight5 said:
train can't go in reverse direction .
spectacular noise in the coach .
fuel tank full of jet fuel .
seems like a bloody daft idea to me ( unless it's just for research ) .
You're fogetting the critical fact though and that is IT HAS JET ENGINES STRAPPED TO ITS ROOF!!! The very act of strapping a large turbo-jet to anything instantly renders it a) very cool, and b) something wonderous.

For example, rusty tranit van = Boring. Rusty transit van featuring a jet engine = very cool.

Crappy old mountain bike = borderline worthless. A luggage rack and a jet engine adds instant interest.


tight5

2,747 posts

159 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
forgot to mention low bridges , so jets wouldn't stay on for long .

AlexIT

1,490 posts

138 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
tight5 said:
forgot to mention low bridges , so jets wouldn't stay on for long .
Must be great in tunnel tough.... biggrinbiggrin