Does a 1994 sports bike look really old to you?

Does a 1994 sports bike look really old to you?

Author
Discussion

d8mok

1,815 posts

205 months

Saturday 18th October 2014
quotequote all
Maybe its an age thing. Because i wasnt into bikes until 2008 anything thats older than a modern bike looks really really old to me. Im not saying they look bad, just old. Id love a 916

Tribal Chestnut

2,997 posts

182 months

Saturday 18th October 2014
quotequote all
IMO the proportions of 90's bikes are so much more balanced than modern ones, particularly the rear where you actually have something proper to sit on, not a seat perched up in the air. gorgeous colour schemes too.

Fire99

9,844 posts

229 months

Saturday 18th October 2014
quotequote all
I don't doubt that bikes have become more sophisticated and dynamically they've moved on as technology allows, but I have to be honest, there was something about 90's superbikes that I really liked. The extra physical size and 'substance' just makes the bike look more purposeful.

I used to own a C1 Kawasaki ZX-9r and I know it was much lighter and dynamically better than the 'B' model, I still think the chunkier 'B' looks better.
The ZXR 750 'J' model is another one. Ok they strangled the power on that model but for pure looks I think it still looks ace.

Another great looking bike was the Laverda 750 Formula. Ok there are some 'aged' angles but as a whole it has a great look.

Ever since the R1 kinda pushed the envelope of 1000cc pace in a 400cc frame, superbikes have become tiny which is great but also unfortunate, depending where you are standing/sitting smile

8potdave

2,303 posts

213 months

Monday 20th October 2014
quotequote all
They don't look dated to me really, but pre 1990 certainly does. I'm not sure if I put this down to my age though, I'm 32 and when I was a kid in the 90's all the Foxeye Blades, GSXR's, Ninja's etc were my dream. I loved the noise of a race can, the colour schemes, etc. I think this has just stayed with me and I still see these machines as something special. I must admit I haven't ridden anything relatively modern and I'll soon be throwing £1500 or so at a bike so it will more than likely fall into the late 90's/early 00's category. Maybe when I do ride something new and look at buying one suddenly older bikes will seem... well older!

It happened in my car world recently. I've always driven older stuff, some fruity some not so! However we had a baby last year and I decided I wanted us to have a nice, modern family car. I bought a 2010 Volvo V70 which has now made me look at cars 2006 and older as old. This time last year a 2006 car would have been almost new to me. Wow, what a ramble biggrin

Hooli

32,278 posts

200 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
Tribal Chestnut said:
IMO the proportions of 90's bikes are so much more balanced than modern ones, particularly the rear where you actually have something proper to sit on, not a seat perched up in the air. gorgeous colour schemes too.
yes

One of the main things I don't like about modern bikes generally is they tend to be missing most of the rear end, at least to my eyes.

Tribal Chestnut

2,997 posts

182 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
Hooli said:
yes

One of the main things I don't like about modern bikes generally is they tend to be missing most of the rear end, at least to my eyes.
I think the RSV4 is one of the best examples of this. Lovely looking bike, but half of it is missing.

JRH63

166 posts

122 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all


Agreed...

JRH63

166 posts

122 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all


Agreed...

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

233 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
speaking of 90s bikes....

SpudLink

5,775 posts

192 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
Hooli said:
One of the main things I don't like about modern bikes generally is they tend to be missing most of the rear end, at least to my eyes.
I was watching a YouTube video of the guys responsible for the BAC Mono. Modern sports bikes were one of their reference points. The ‘half the rear is missing’ concept is what they wanted, moving away from the old idea of superbikes and supercars that were designed to look as though they had ‘substance’.


Hooli

32,278 posts

200 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
I just don't like it, the same as I don't like single sided swingarms. Both look incomplete to me.
It might work and be good, it just seems wrong.

Tribal Chestnut

2,997 posts

182 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
Yep, another 5-10kgs or whatever is going to make bugger all difference to me.

Baryonyx

17,996 posts

159 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
croyde said:
My 100 bhp Superbike of 1988.

That is a brilliant looking bike.

dibblecorse

6,875 posts

192 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
As released in 1994 ...


smg916

18 posts

162 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all


Beaten to it, but... My '95 916 owned since 97. I've got a Street Triple R too for commuting, which is light, smooth, refined and I can probably ride the Triumph quicker just about everywhere ...but I still absolutely love the 916 for its looks as much as I did when I bought it.

Baryonyx

17,996 posts

159 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
dibblecorse said:
As released in 1994 ...

Could it be argued this was one the kickstarters for the natural progression to the 'missing' back end of modern bikes? Lots of space between the seat top and the back wheel there, but presented in a rather nice way. One of my favourite looking bikes of all time though, undoubtedly. But then, a single sided swing arm does wonders for most things.

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

165 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
One of the great things about the substantial rear ends on older bikes is the storage space, my SRAD has a small boot on the back, easily enough room for a packed lunch, wallet, keys, spare drink etc. My mate's Fireblade could probably carry a Snickers bar - if he left the tool kit at home.

I do like the modern bikes though with their tapering back ends, though I too find the RSV4 a bit much, it looks almost like a streetfighter chop, it's so short.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
My 1999 Tourer ? I guess. Having lived with it for a few months it sometimes looks old fashioned and sometimes looks very modern. To me new bikes have a lot of the chassis (frame) on the outside.


rsv696

474 posts

143 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
90's all the way for me, but I passed my test in 1994 & I guess that's my era.







And my own steed :


Simes205

4,539 posts

228 months

Tuesday 21st October 2014
quotequote all
I still own a 90's bike!

078 by simes205, on Flickr