The peado finder general appointment
Discussion
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29719090
So the 2nd person is to be kicked off the leadership of the panel to look into historical child abuse
Who would keep the masses happy?
Or should we just save the hassle and throw everyone the left want thrown in jail in jail without trial
So the 2nd person is to be kicked off the leadership of the panel to look into historical child abuse
Who would keep the masses happy?
Or should we just save the hassle and throw everyone the left want thrown in jail in jail without trial
I have got no specific recommendation but why don't they look outside London?
Pick a respected person north of Hampstead and go from there.
Perhaps a grammar schooler or maybe even a comprehensive boy or girl.
How about a foreigner? (not French)
At least someone who doesn't go to knitting parties with the people they are supposed to be questioning.
Pick a respected person north of Hampstead and go from there.
Perhaps a grammar schooler or maybe even a comprehensive boy or girl.
How about a foreigner? (not French)
At least someone who doesn't go to knitting parties with the people they are supposed to be questioning.
Given that Lord Brittan and his office 'lost' a 40-page dossier that detailed alleged paedophile activity in the 1980s at Westminster (I assume this will need to be investigated at the inquiry) and that Fiona Woolf, the new the chair of the inquiry, dined with Lord and Lady Brittan numerous times at both Woolf's residence and at the Brittan residence perhaps Woolf shouldn't be chairing the inquiry.
Edited by BlackLabel on Wednesday 22 October 19:47
otolith said:
"We need a senior, experienced legal figure, who is not part of The Establishment"
Good luck with that.
Good pointGood luck with that.
Why do they need to be legal though?
There are plenty of people who are used to dealing with projects where they gather lots of evidence, present that evidence in a cogent manner and then reach a conclusion based on the evidence.
Rovinghawk said:
his might be a wild stab in the dark, but I believe it's because libel and slander aren't actually crimes.
oh well maybe I should have asked why hasn't any of the people who he perhaps slanders/libels in his films taken a civil case against him?(are you happy now?)
Edited by dingg on Wednesday 22 October 16:57
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff