Racism ?

Author
Discussion

Nigel Worc's

Original Poster:

8,121 posts

188 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
I know this is the daily wail, but it just cannot be true ............. can it ?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2808822/Or...

If there is any truth in that, any truth at all, then the coppers and the security guard should be sacked.

Just for clarity, I'm not a Muslim either.

Greendubber

13,168 posts

203 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
If the person he said his ridiculous stupid comment to perceived it as being racist then the police are duty bound to act on it, the daily mail won't say that though.

It's a stupid thing to say in the first place, why even say it? He was asked to remove his shoes because he was going through security, no sympathy from me he should have kept his mouth shut. He's saying only Muslims should be subject to more detailed searches, they guys an idiot.

Edited by Greendubber on Monday 27th October 20:37

MrBarry123

6,027 posts

121 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
But it is racist so I don't understand your point?

crossy67

1,570 posts

179 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Muslim is a religion not a race.

Nigel Worc's

Original Poster:

8,121 posts

188 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
MrBarry123 said:
But it is racist so I don't understand your point?
No it isn't racist, what race are Muslims ?

If he'd made reference to a race, then perhaps, but only just perhaps.

I often feel the same way as they confiscate my lucozade I carry in case of hypos or whatever other crap they come up with.

MrBarry123

6,027 posts

121 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
crossy67 said:
Muslim is a religion not a race.
Nope. A Muslim is a follower of Islam.

Racist is defined as: the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

Race is defined as: a social concept used to categorise humans into large and distinct populations or groups by anatomical, cultural, ethnic, genetic, geographical, historical, linguistic, religious, and/or social affiliation.

Your point is therefore invalid on all counts.

MrBarry123

6,027 posts

121 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Nigel Worc's said:
No it isn't racist, what race are Muslims ?

If he'd made reference to a race, then perhaps, but only just perhaps.

I often feel the same way as they confiscate my lucozade I carry in case of hypos or whatever other crap they come up with.
See above. Yet again, your point is invalid.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

128 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Sorry Nigel, on what basis should the cops and security guard be sacked?

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

128 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
And Greendubber...have you been drinking?!

Nigel Worc's

Original Poster:

8,121 posts

188 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
MrBarry123 said:
Nope. A Muslim is a follower of Islam.

Racist is defined as: the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

Race is defined as: a social concept used to categorise humans into large and distinct populations or groups by anatomical, cultural, ethnic, genetic, geographical, historical, linguistic, religious, and/or social affiliation.

Your point is therefore invalid on all counts.
Hmm, sounds bks to me.

If the above is true, why don't we see Muslims in court on charges of racism ?

crossy67

1,570 posts

179 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
MrBarry123 said:
Nope. A Muslim is a follower of Islam.

Racist is defined as: the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

Race is defined as: a social concept used to categorise humans into large and distinct populations or groups by anatomical, cultural, ethnic, genetic, geographical, historical, linguistic, religious, and/or social affiliation.

Your point is therefore invalid on all counts.
OH MY GOD!! I'm wrong, I must change my views completely and the next time I fill in my passport application I can be classified as an Atheist from Atheia smile

Greendubber

13,168 posts

203 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
And Greendubber...have you been drinking?!
Nope just think the bloke in the report needs keep his mouth shut and not play the victim when someone takes offence to a ridiculous comment.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

128 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Nope just think the bloke in the report needs keep his mouth shut and not play the victim when someone takes offence to a ridiculous comment.
Sorry, I was referring to your unusually jumbled reply! wink

Jasandjules

69,868 posts

229 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Clearly the chap was a bit of a t**t. But I think arrest etc is a touch harsh.

MrBarry123

6,027 posts

121 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Nigel Worc's said:
Hmm, sounds bks to me.

If the above is true, why don't we see Muslims in court on charges of racism ?
Brilliant.

I'm afraid that I put more value in the definitions offered by the Oxford Dictionary than a bloke who doesn't understand the term racism and uses this lack of understanding to justify his own racist tendencies.

And please explain what you mean by your other point?

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

128 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Clearly the chap was a bit of a t**t. But I think arrest etc is a touch harsh.
It may seem harsh, but if you look at it from another position, someone makes a claim of Racially/religiously aggravated public order...that's something that would go to CPS for charging decision etc. police have to take action, and would be heavily criticised if they didn't.

(Eclassy should be along soon to clarify Code G and necessity, but I would argue positive action had to be taken)

Greendubber

13,168 posts

203 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Clearly the chap was a bit of a t**t. But I think arrest etc is a touch harsh.
Falls into the remit of a 'hate crime', which the police get beaten with a stick over for now 'taking action'.

Nigel Worc's

Original Poster:

8,121 posts

188 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
Sorry Nigel, on what basis should the cops and security guard be sacked?
On the basis that anyone offended by a statement like that shouldn't be doing the job of a security guard, especially at an airport, where they revel in being complete arses.

I have actually made the same remark myself, when they really did confiscate my small unopened bottle of lucozade, at Birmingham airport, despite all the documentation I carry.

Also, bear in mind the chap is 75 years old, and almost certainly, like myself, he will not bow down to this liberal PC crap.

I am surprised, but perhaps I shouldn't be, that people would support his arrest.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

128 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Are you admitting openly to making racially/religiously aggravated comments?

So someone makes a complaint of a serious nature and the authorities deal with it accordingly, and you'd like to see them all lose their jobs?

Nigel Worc's

Original Poster:

8,121 posts

188 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
Are you admitting openly to making racially/religiously aggravated comments?

So someone makes a complaint of a serious nature and the authorities deal with it accordingly, and you'd like to see them all lose their jobs?
I don't consider that to be racist in the slightest.

Complaint of a serious nature ? FFS !

If it was so serious, why was it dropped then ?