Cost of ministers' special advisers hits £8.4m.

Cost of ministers' special advisers hits £8.4m.

Author
Discussion

BlackLabel

Original Poster:

13,251 posts

123 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
So much for Cameron's pre election promise to 'get the cost of politics down'.


bbc said:
The cost of ministers' special advisers has risen to £8.4m following a rise of more than £1m in the past year.

There are now 103 "spads" employed to give advice over and above the work carried out by civil servants, up from 98 last year, official figures show.

They include a total of 26 working for David Cameron in Downing Street and 20 working for Nick Clegg.

The government said it reflected the "nature of coalition" and that their average pay was higher under Labour.

Labour said the figures showed that the overall numbers of special advisers had risen inexorably under the coalition.

According to the Cabinet Office, the total salary bill was £8.4m in 2013-14, compared with £7.2m in 2012-13.

Six advisers are being paid £100,000 or more, with the list topped by David Cameron's chief-of-staff Ed Llewellyn and his director of communications, Craig Oliver, who each received £140,000.

Mr Clegg's director of communications, Steve Lotinga, earned £105,000.

Shadow leader of the House Angela Eagle said: "David Cameron promised to get the cost of politics down but under him the number of special advisers spirals ever upwards.

"The Lib Dems used to say that special advisers shouldn't be paid for by the public but as soon as Nick Clegg got his feet under the Cabinet table, he broke his word."
'Less spin doctors'

The Coalition Agreement said the government would "put a limit on the number on special advisers" but the pay bill and numbers have increased over the past few years.

The rising cost of special advisers was also criticised by UKIP. The party's economic spokesman Patrick O'Flynn said: "What we really need are more real doctors and less government spin doctors."

A Cabinet Office official said: "Workforce reductions and pension reforms saved £4.7bn last year, compared to a 2009/10 baseline.

"Special advisers perform an important function and their average salary cost is 8% lower now than under the previous government."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30541478

LordGrover

33,538 posts

212 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
"Special advisers perform an important function and their average salary cost is 8% lower now than under the previous government."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30541478
Rather vague and meaningless, no?
IF there were two of them averaging £100,000 each and there are now ten of them earning an average of £92,000 each it costs rather more now than it did then, IYSWIM.

Digga

40,300 posts

283 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Big government. There is no mainstream political party that is not wedded to it.

Bonfire of the quangos my arse.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

135 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Digga said:
Big government. There is no mainstream political party that is not wedded to it.

Bonfire of the quangos my arse.
You mean, Cameron broke a promise to the electorate?

Nah, I'm not having that.

Digga

40,300 posts

283 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Axionknight said:
You mean, Cameron broke a promise to the electorate?

Nah, I'm not having that.
I think it was that and the total lack of engagement or understanding of small businesses (much better to spend time helping Pater-in-law sell windymills) that totally sealed my dislike of him and the coalition as a whole.

BlackLabel

Original Poster:

13,251 posts

123 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Nick Clegg has 20 SpAds. If Clegg disappeared overnight and took his SpAds with him would anyone (other than the SpAds) notice a difference in the quality of their life?

One of the few things that Gordon Brown got right was scrapping the deputy PM post. Cameron should have done the same

Jasandjules

69,868 posts

229 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
So, Austerity for poor people, more boll**ks, champers and caviar for the inbreds?

Frybywire

468 posts

196 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all

sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
We rack up interest on our debt of more than £10m every hour or two, so I'm not too concerned about this compared to other spending!

jogon

2,971 posts

158 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Digga said:
I think it was that and the total lack of engagement or understanding of small businesses (much better to spend time helping Pater-in-law sell windymills) that totally sealed my dislike of him and the coalition as a whole.
Ahh yes the grand appointment of celeb "high street guru" Mary Portas that turned out to be a token gesture as they failed to implement anything she recommended.

BoRED S2upid

19,683 posts

240 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Is that all? Give them all a Christmas bonus they are doing a sterling job.

JustAnotherLogin

1,127 posts

121 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Axionknight said:
Digga said:
Big government. There is no mainstream political party that is not wedded to it.

Bonfire of the quangos my arse.
You mean, Cameron broke a promise to the electorate?

Nah, I'm not having that.
Firstly it was not Cameron who promised a "bonfire of the Quangos. That was Gorden Brown and Heseltine. Cameron actually said:

[i]But the opposition leader shied away from setting a target for the numbers of bodies he aimed to axe or the savings he hoped to achieve. "It would be far too simplistic for me to stand here and announce some kind of 'Bonfire of the Quangos'," Mr Cameron told a London audience. Instead, he cited the Tory plans for three specific quangos to illustrate "the scale of change we envisage".
[/i]
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/74510aa4-6a8c-11de-ad04-...


Secondly spending on these bodies is down (from an otherwise very critical report):
[i]The latest published and audited figures show annual spending reductions under the Public Bodies Reform Programme were an estimated £723 million in 2012-13 compared to 2010-11[/]

And that is even allowing for creating more in other areas, notably the NHS

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/commi...


Digga

40,300 posts

283 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
JustAnotherLogin said:
Firstly it was not Cameron who promised a "bonfire of the Quangos. That was Gorden Brown and Heseltine...
Just checked and the earliest quote I find is on the BBC and confirms what you say. Seems to have backfired badly on him though because all subsequent media quotes allude to this 'promise' being made by Dave.

Still, he's a jowly, cronyist, so my dislike stands along with the fact that none of what he actually did promise with regard to the quangos appears to have been done.

The sheer waste in parts of the public sector, when other areas of it are delivering well but suffering the effects of austerity is utterly disgusting. I concede that the intractability of Whitehall plays no small part in this, whoever might happen to be in power.

BlackLabel

Original Poster:

13,251 posts

123 months

Friday 18th December 2015
quotequote all
article said:
George Osborne has given his image adviser a promotion and a pay rise of 42 per cent - while asking public-sector workers to accept a pay freeze.

The amount of money spent on government spin doctors has risen to £9.2m in 2014-15, from £8.4m in the preivous financial year.

Details of the cost of special advisers were released by the Cabinet Office on the day Parliament breaks for Christmas, which Labour derided as a "shockingly cynical move".

Tom Watson, Labour's deputy leader, told The Guardian: "David Cameron can’t bury the fact that he’s broken a direct promise he made to reduce the cost of politics and curb the number of special advisers in government."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/george-osborne-gave-his-image-adviser-a-42-pay-rise-while-asking-public-sector-workers-to-accept-pay-a6777781.html

Randy Winkman

16,095 posts

189 months

Saturday 19th December 2015
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
article said:
George Osborne has given his image adviser a promotion and a pay rise of 42 per cent - while asking public-sector workers to accept a pay freeze.

The amount of money spent on government spin doctors has risen to £9.2m in 2014-15, from £8.4m in the preivous financial year.

Details of the cost of special advisers were released by the Cabinet Office on the day Parliament breaks for Christmas, which Labour derided as a "shockingly cynical move".

Tom Watson, Labour's deputy leader, told The Guardian: "David Cameron can’t bury the fact that he’s broken a direct promise he made to reduce the cost of politics and curb the number of special advisers in government."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/george-osborne-gave-his-image-adviser-a-42-pay-rise-while-asking-public-sector-workers-to-accept-pay-a6777781.html
And the number of Special Advisers has gone up from 98 to 103 in the last year. which makes no sense at all since we now have only one party in power. That should mean fewer.

eccles

13,728 posts

222 months

Saturday 19th December 2015
quotequote all
Jobs for the boys. wink

Randy Winkman

16,095 posts

189 months

Sunday 20th December 2015
quotequote all
Plus increasing political interference in the civil service.

Digga

40,300 posts

283 months

Monday 21st December 2015
quotequote all
Yes, plus next year sees that huge dump of red-tape on small businesses forcing them to become pensions nannies to the masses. This government is staffed with clueless cretins from top to bottom.

BlackLabel

Original Poster:

13,251 posts

123 months

wc98

10,375 posts

140 months

Friday 8th April 2016
quotequote all
Digga said:
Yes, plus next year sees that huge dump of red-tape on small businesses forcing them to become pensions nannies to the masses. This government is staffed with clueless cretins from top to bottom.
we really are fked at the moment. this lot or the labour version of clueless cretins .