Wrist Check 2015
Discussion
jimmy156 said:
CardShark said:
It's been a while since I wore this, however its quality never fails to impress.
Love that, a lot, a bit like mine but a lot more special 2014-01-01 by jimmyb156, on Flickr
There's a lot to be said for Seiko's "5" range, plenty of choice and great watches for the money.
Edited by CardShark on Wednesday 2nd September 22:37
SlackBladder said:
Mja300 said:
I'm guessing the Rolex is too.Breitlings are hilariously bad fakes the open heart Seagull movement is a easy give away. None of the Rolex's or Omega watches look right to me. I can't tell about the others, the image is too poor, but given so many duffers in one box, I'd be gobsmacked if they weren't also purchased from the bloke in the market with the watch display on the inside of his flasher style raincoat.
Why do it? There are fakes available that can fool an expert in a detailed examination. You often need to take the back off. The fact that these can be so easily spotted in such a poor grainy photo means that they must look terrible in the flesh. Perhaps these are worn with a checkered suit, hula hoop waisted trousers, oversize shoes and a squirty button hole flower - then they might not look out of place.
Revs_Addiction said:
Nope, mine's smooth as you like. Hope you can get yours sorted.
Ah balls, mine was smooth a few times then this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjhiSwd6M0UIt's a shame because apart from that I'm smitten with it.
GWC said:
Looks great on the mesh, this is about the best picture I could get of mine. It's one of the few watches I stare at when wearing it.Janesy B said:
Revs_Addiction said:
Nope, mine's smooth as you like. Hope you can get yours sorted.
Ah balls, mine was smooth a few times then this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjhiSwd6M0UIt's a shame because apart from that I'm smitten with it.
Gassing Station | Watches | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff