997.1 owners. How many are problem free ?

997.1 owners. How many are problem free ?

Author
Discussion

zulash

Original Poster:

202 posts

110 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
i would just like a bit of feedback from owners who have a 997.1 that has NOT yet fallen foul of the ims/bore score problems. also if the car is an early model or fitted with the larger bearing. (if there are any)

edit

56 posts

170 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
2007 with X51. Bought from OPC in Stockholm. Currently 50,000kms and no known problems to date. I've got an OPC warrantee until October that I am thinking about renewing just for peace of mind.

Can anyone comment if the x51 kit makes it less prone to the problems?

Plu Tony M

29 posts

119 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
2007 CS with 49,000 miles. Tip top. No problems at all.

ril7979

53 posts

144 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
2004 CS 40k miles, no troubles, have fitted Hartech LTT, renewed the Rads, change the oil annually and let it warm up

sneakybear

127 posts

153 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
2005 997.1 X51. So far so good at 82k miles.

Edited:
So torque curve is as per this post for X51 does this make it less prone? think probably not imho



Edited by sneakybear on Wednesday 25th March 08:59

- A - Power (kW)
- B - Engine Speed (RPM)
- C - Torque (Nm/ftlb.)
- D - Standard C2s engine
- E - C2s engine with X51 Upgrade

Edited by sneakybear on Wednesday 25th March 08:59

crystalmethod

1,156 posts

179 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
Had a 2006 model from 2008-2012. No massive issues.

Highly recommend them, and great value now. Just negotiate hard on 2-3 cars at different OPCs. Usually one will go the extra mile to close a deal. Buy that particular one with a warranty.

CraigJ

593 posts

205 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
2004 54 reg 997.1 3.8s with 79k no issues. Standard car.

fastgerman

1,914 posts

195 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
2005 997.1 C2S bought in 2011 with 35k miles, now close to 50k miles.
IMS/RMS, gearbox, front shocks and some minor gubins covered under warranty in the first year. Only servicing since.

Had a quick look on autotrader earlier and the cheapest 3.8 Carrera S Cabriolet is £22k with 114k miles on the clock. Quite a few cars with near on 100k miles now.

There is a 2007 car with 124k mileage and up for £25,500

I'd also say that good cars with around 60k miles and less haven't dropped below £26k for the cabriolet.

Most 964's and 3.2's would have had engine work by 100k miles, if not, they're probably leaking on the drive/garage.

Edited by fastgerman on Wednesday 25th March 16:53

drmark

4,824 posts

186 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
40k no issues (this time).

zulash

Original Poster:

202 posts

110 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
Great to read good news for a change regarding these motors. I've just acquired a 2007 41k c2 tip s. 300 mile drive home with her .... seemed faultless. hope it stays that way! cloud9

Ian_UK1

1,514 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th March 2015
quotequote all
I used to own a 2004 C2S. I bought at 1 year old with approx 15000 miles and sold at 5 1/2 yrs old, having put over 45000 miles on the car. It was regularly driven very hard (including a PHN tour of France). The car was modded with extractor manifolds, 200-cell cats, free-flow silencers, BMC-F1 filter, custom remap by Wayne Schofield, Bilstein B16 Damptronic coilovers and a custom geo by CG. The engine mods gave a very noticeable increase in the top half of the rpm band (loading the engine's internals harder than normal) whilst the Bilstein's much higher spring rates increased the loadings on the car's 'shell.

The car was always warmed through thoroughly, with no more than part throttle and 3500rpm used until the oil came up to temp (90 degrees). Thereafter it was often driven as hard as conditions (and the local law) allowed, with no special attention given to driving off gently from lights after a hard run or other modifications of driving style designed to ward-off IMS and bore-scoring issues. I don't think such precautions were even known-about when I owned the car: nor was the 'low-temp thermostat' mod, so the car always had the standard 'stat installed.

In France on the PHN tour, the oil temp regularly exceeded 130 degrees C through the mountains but the engine was left running at each stop until all the temps came down. Engine oil was changed every 12 months as a minimum and more frequently if the car had seen particularly hard use. After the France tour, what came out of the sump is best described as 'burnt'. The old oil literally smelt like it had caught fire in the sump and it had only been there for the 2000-odd miles of the tour!

With the exception of 1 faulty coil pack, the car never had any engine issues at all. However, it did have other issues, the biggest of which was lunching a bearing in the gearbox (manual) that totalled the 'box! It also had plenty of electrical gremlins - mostly down to the known issue with the main charge cable from the alternator to the battery. It also lunched its alternator bearings during the France tour.

The car was returned to standard prior to trading it in and the engine was still running beautifully. It used almost no oil, had a very smooth tickover and no evidence of any reduction in power/torque compared to lower mileage examples owned by friends.

All the available evidence suggests that only a small percentage of engines fail prematurely and catastrophically and the fact I was able to run a modified, early engine (with the small IMS bearing) very hard indeed, with no ill effects, is certainly supportive of this assertion. (Not that it makes things any easier for the small percentage of owners that do suffer failures). It's my belief (based on my own car and several other owned by friends over the years) that the majority of the Gen-1 3.8s can probably take all the 'punishment' mine did, if they're maintained thoroughly and regularly. In fact, I think the harder they're driven and the more regularly the oil's changed, the less likely failures might be (but that's just my own, anecdotal opinion).



Edited by Ian_UK1 on Wednesday 25th March 18:13

STiG911

1,210 posts

167 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
O
Ian_UK1 said:
It's my belief (based on my own car and several other owned by friends over the years) that the majority of the Gen-1 3.8s can probably take all the 'punishment' mine did, if they're maintained thoroughly and regularly. In fact, I think the harder they're driven and the more regularly the oil's changed, the less likely failures might be (but that's just my own, anecdotal opinion).

Edited by Ian_UK1 on Wednesday 25th March 18:13
^This. I treat my 997 c2s the same way. Warm up properly (oil to 90deg) then give her a proper rinsing and change the oil every year regardless. She's now approaching 94k and is still strong as an Ox.
It's a sports car and peak torque and power are both North of 4k rpm, so all these idiots who baby them round town then moan when they go pop deserve all they get.

drmark

4,824 posts

186 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
STiG911 said:
^This. I treat my 997 c2s the same way. Warm up properly (oil to 90deg) then give her a proper rinsing and change the oil every year regardless. She's now approaching 94k and is still strong as an Ox.
It's a sports car and peak torque and power are both North of 4k rpm, so all these idiots who baby them round town then moan when they go pop deserve all they get.
My wife's curerent 4S Is going great guns at 40k and she pushes hard, but her previous one had a new engine at 7k. No one deserves all they get when it comes to IMS/scoring. And the idiots are the people who do NOT "baby them around town". Why would you thrash a Porsche in a city / town?

STiG911

1,210 posts

167 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
O
Ian_UK1 said:
It's my belief (based on my own car and several other owned by friends over the years) that the majority of the Gen-1 3.8s can probably take all the 'punishment' mine did, if they're maintained thoroughly and regularly. In fact, I think the harder they're driven and the more regularly the oil's changed, the less likely failures might be (but that's just my own, anecdotal opinion).

Edited by Ian_UK1 on Wednesday 25th March 18:13
^This. I treat my 997 c2s the same way. Warm up properly (oil to 90deg) then give her a proper rinsing and change the oil every year regardless. She's now approaching 94k and is still strong as an Ox.
It's a sports car and peak torque and power are both North of 4k rpm, so all these idiots who baby them round town then moan when they go pop deserve all they get.

Slickhillsy

1,772 posts

143 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
STiG911 said:
so all these idiots who baby them round town then moan when they go pop deserve all they get.
Nob- what a stupid comment...

STiG911

1,210 posts

167 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
A) I don't thrash my Porsche or any other car round town; thanks for the assumption.
B) By babying I meant people who use their car in town for short trips and not much else ever..okay, they may not deserve all they get, but they're not helping themselves either.

WallyCarrera

59 posts

169 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
'05 C2S, 43K currently, done 5K in the 12 months I've owned it. Used most days, mainly short journeys where the oil doesn't get fully up to temperature unfortunately, but interspersed with long runs. Switched to Millers Nanotech last year and will likely install LTT this year. Expenditure has been an oil service, a pair of rear tyres (after puncture) and it now needs a windscreen wiper. Compared to my 964, well.........

newboy997

48 posts

117 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
'05 C2S, 79k

3rd rad and LTT fitted at 66k, recently switched to millers, always warm up properly

no major issues, goes like a train

Eleven

26,271 posts

222 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
newboy997 said:
no major issues, goes like a train
That chuffing noise is low compression on one cylinder.

mickyveloce

1,035 posts

236 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
That these (regular) posts are here at all signifies both frustration and disappointment for me as a Porsche enthusiast.

The company built a reputation on diligent and top quality engineering principles and, as a consequence, made some superb sports cars; the very best in the world.

However, at the turn of every key, if the owner is listening for unwanted noises, and at the finish of every journey the priority is to check exhaust pipe colours, then what's the point.

That Porsche re-engineered the 997.2 engine at all is an admission that the earlier unit had inherent issues, and the constant need for reassurance in threads like this one will continue to steer potential 996/997.1 owners towards less worrisome pleasures.