Most pointless engine.

Author
Discussion

eldar

Original Poster:

21,711 posts

196 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
We've had threads about good and bad engines, but not, as far as far as I can find pointless engines.

The one that occurs to me is the 3.0l V8 that was developed for the Triumph Stag. Pointless in that engines of a similar power were already available - inline 6 of 2.5l (Triumph)and 3.0l (Austin), 2.8 to 4.2l (Jaguar)and 2 V8s, 2.5l Daimler and 3.5l Rover.

The Stag engine was a failure, under developed and horribly unreliable for the first couple of years. Timing chain stretch, cooling marginal, and other problems.

It did nothing the Rover V8 couldn't do better, so pointless.

Any others?

shake n bake

2,221 posts

207 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Hondas effort in this years F1?

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Ford V4 springs to mind....

Negative Creep

24,964 posts

227 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Ford 1.3 Duratec when the 1.25 Zetec was sold alongside it

J4CKO

41,498 posts

200 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Jag V12 when in an E-Type.

jamieduff1981

8,024 posts

140 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Suddenly I fancy a Stag.

It's hard to imagine how frigging dull cars would be if everything used one of a handful of played-out engines.

daytona365

1,773 posts

164 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Most pointless engine ? Anything over, say, lets be generous, 2litres ! Unless its for heavy haulage/military etc.

Baz Tench

5,648 posts

190 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Ford 1.3 when used in the Capri.

It was bad enough in 1.6 guise in the same car....

gazza285

9,806 posts

208 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
280E said:
Ford V4 springs to mind....
I remember a local lad had one of these in a Mazda, after it had lunched it's rotary engine, probably went like a bag of nails, but it certainly sounded different. This would be around 1980...

R8VXF

6,788 posts

115 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
daytona365 said:
Most pointless engine ? Anything over, say, lets be generous, 2litres ! Unless its for heavy haulage/military etc.
Got to agree with that. <goes to check garage /> Ooops biggrin

vrooom

3,763 posts

267 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
any (small)diesel engine in car.

Willwors

76 posts

128 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Slightly off piste but I can't think that the Mazda rotary would make it in this day and age when it was winning awards right left and centre ten years ago. 15mpg and all that oil and CO2 wouldn't suffice for the revs.

What happened to the short-lived 2.9l Boxster/Cayman engine?

Axionknight

8,505 posts

135 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
daytona365 said:
Most pointless engine ? Anything over, say, lets be generous, 2litres ! Unless its for heavy haulage/military etc.
redcard

Get out!

grkify

366 posts

120 months

Pebbles167

3,435 posts

152 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
BMW V8 found in the E34 530i and the one in the E39 535i. The 6 cylinder engines were just about as powerful.

eldar

Original Poster:

21,711 posts

196 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
280E said:
Ford V4 springs to mind....
True, I'd forgotten that.

Krupp Stahl

212 posts

128 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
None of them are pointless.

They all turn petrol into work.

Granted - some do that better than others, but none of them are pointless.

I love them all.




B'stard Child

28,371 posts

246 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
shake n bake said:
Hondas effort in this years F1?
Oh go on then rofl

Morningside

24,110 posts

229 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
The wankel engine. Very, very clever but I really cannot see the point of it. confused

smithyithy

7,223 posts

118 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
<1500cc non-turbo diesels.