Company moving
Discussion
I'd say you are way off, this happens all the time without people being made redundant or having new contracts. Depends how far away the new site is though I suspect.
Edit: actually read this: https://www.gov.uk/employer-relocation-your-rights
Edit: actually read this: https://www.gov.uk/employer-relocation-your-rights
Edited by 130R on Thursday 28th May 15:05
Jasandjules said:
It is not quite as simplistic as that.
There is bumping, suitable alternative positions and all sorts to consider.
??? OK but it is 100 miles, no financial help to move or to re-house and new town. All would be offered the same job, same conditions etc as now but in new town. So where does that leave people.There is bumping, suitable alternative positions and all sorts to consider.
I should add it isn't me. I am happy to move, but some are not as it will cost them a lot of money and they just plain do not wish to move towns.
Grumfutock said:
??? OK but it is 100 miles, no financial help to move or to re-house and new town. All would be offered the same job, same conditions etc as now but in new town. So where does that leave people.
I should add it isn't me. I am happy to move, but some are not as it will cost them a lot of money and they just plain do not wish to move towns.
Is the company offering these people redundancy packages?I should add it isn't me. I am happy to move, but some are not as it will cost them a lot of money and they just plain do not wish to move towns.
Grumfutock said:
Nope. Kind of why I was asking really. I think they are getting a crap deal, move or lose job.
Well that becomes a different issue. Are they claiming to be offering a suitable alternative position by offering a role 100 miles away and not paying any moving costs? And I am assuming the individuals concerned are not Director level and so on?However, if they "lose their job" they are by definition redundant and accordingly (assuming they have the qualifying period) entitled to those payments (which are not fantastic by any means, but better than nothing).
Jasandjules said:
Well that becomes a different issue. Are they claiming to be offering a suitable alternative position by offering a role 100 miles away and not paying any moving costs? And I am assuming the individuals concerned are not Director level and so on?
However, if they "lose their job" they are by definition redundant and accordingly (assuming they have the qualifying period) entitled to those payments (which are not fantastic by any means, but better than nothing).
No they are just normal workers. They do meet the qualification period so at least they may get something then. Thank you.However, if they "lose their job" they are by definition redundant and accordingly (assuming they have the qualifying period) entitled to those payments (which are not fantastic by any means, but better than nothing).
Gassing Station | Jobs & Employment Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff