Will Red Bull quit F1

Will Red Bull quit F1

Author
Discussion

suffolk009

Original Poster:

5,373 posts

165 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
There are rumours that Red Bull are about to quit.
There are rumours that Red Bull will be sold to Renault.
There are rumours that Gerhard Berger is about to buy Toro Rosso.
There are rumours that Matestz is about to buy F1 from CVC.

Anyone got any more?

2fast748

1,091 posts

195 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
Red Bull have signed the Concorde Agreement to compete until 2020.

/thread

It's what makes all the gnashing of teeth in Milton Keynes so pathetic. Now di Montezemolo has gone F1 has a new bully and he's wearing a Red Bull shirt.

Jasandjules

69,868 posts

229 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
I don't care either way. Frankly if they want to whine and moan about how hard done by they are they should leave, it doesn't do their "Red Bull" image any good.

MartG

20,666 posts

204 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
I don't care either way. Frankly if they want to whine and moan about how hard done by they are they should leave, it doesn't do their "Red Bull" image any good.
Red Bull gives you Whiners

Sixpackpert

4,557 posts

214 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
MartG said:
Red Bull gives you Whiners
Red Bull, Gives You Whinge

m444ttb

3,160 posts

229 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
2fast748 said:
Red Bull have signed the Concorde Agreement to compete until 2020.

/thread
That simply makes it more expensive to leave.

fomb

1,402 posts

211 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
I was of the understanding that the team had to compete until 2020, but it doesn't necessarily need to be called Red Bull.

Chrisgr31

13,467 posts

255 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
They wont go, they are just trying to get the rules changed, and are seeking to distract attention from their car, as after all it is not much better than the Torro Rosso.

Mind you not sure how the new rules allow Honda and Renault to catch up?

Derek Smith

45,613 posts

248 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
fomb said:
I was of the understanding that the team had to compete until 2020, but it doesn't necessarily need to be called Red Bull.
I think you will find that the rules (or rather the basis for negotiation or, failing that, something to overrule) require a team to keep the same name. However, they can change it over time. One year they could be Red Renault, and the following year Renault. If they don't then the team with the new name starts without any of the bonuses that RB receive.

That said, rule are not rules in F1 it seems, and there have been more accommodations than all the Hilton Hotels.


NotStig

636 posts

227 months

Saturday 27th June 2015
quotequote all
They seem to have turned into what Ferrari was a couple of years ago. "We aren't winning, we don't like it and we are going to complain about it to anyone who will listen instead of actually working to get ourselves out of the hole we're in."

Hint to Christian Horner and Deitrich - take a look at Williams and the fact that when they were down, they worked and worked and didn't threaten to take their ball home. It's called dignity, something RB seem to have forgotten exists.

ajprice

27,451 posts

196 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
Renault: Red Bull are 'high maintenance'.

hehe

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/33674638

gruffalo

7,520 posts

226 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
ajprice said:
Renault: Red Bull are 'high maintenance'.

hehe

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/33674638
It seems that Renault need to be shown more respect!

How French;-)

Vaud

50,422 posts

155 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
gruffalo said:
It seems that Renault need to be shown more respect!

How French;-)
I think they should be shown more respect, I have massive respect for Red Bull from an engineering perspective - but they have behaved poorly to Renault.

I prefer McLarens "win together, lose together" motto.

I would lay money on the divorce and then exit of RB as a team (though I think they would become a sponsor)

rdjohn

6,168 posts

195 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
My guess is that everything depends on what happens when Renault use their final tokens at Sotchi. The final decision as to what Renault will do in the future rests with their board and not RB, or the engine dept.

If the new bits work, then I guess Renault will buy a team, logically Lotus, may be TR, and then RB are faced with a difficult choice. Ron made the point that there is little point in being a non-works team. If the bits don't work then RB have the same problem, only bigger.

Being a bit player until 2020 is not in their vision, selling to another manufacturer will be difficult given the problems Honda have highlighted with their efforts so far.

It is also interesting that Renault have given up supporting FR3.5 http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/120093... They are clearing the decks for something different, the status quo is not any longer an option.

Edited by rdjohn on Tuesday 28th July 15:03

fomb

1,402 posts

211 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
Ron made the point that there is little point in being a non-works team.
He keeps wheeling this one out. He was the works team in 2009, and was then beaten by a hastily bolted-in customer team. Sure - works is an advantage, but it's not the solution.

slipstream 1985

12,211 posts

179 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
fomb said:
rdjohn said:
Ron made the point that there is little point in being a non-works team.
He keeps wheeling this one out. He was the works team in 2009, and was then beaten by a hastily bolted-in customer team. Sure - works is an advantage, but it's not the solution.
There's far more to that story than you're telling in the above.

Muzzer79

9,903 posts

187 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
fomb said:
rdjohn said:
Ron made the point that there is little point in being a non-works team.
He keeps wheeling this one out. He was the works team in 2009, and was then beaten by a hastily bolted-in customer team. Sure - works is an advantage, but it's not the solution.
Things are a lot different now to 2009.

Back then, an engine was pretty much an engine - it produced what it could and it was all about aero to go faster.

The hybrid powerplants require so much more integration to the various electrical systems now that they are key to performance.

Ron is right - you will not win the championship with a customer engine.

glazbagun

14,276 posts

197 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
This is total fantasy, but I wonder if Williams could be sweet talked back into the glory days if Renault power with the promise of cash from RedBull/Renault. They'd probably take one look at what how McLaren have done running on nostalgia and run a mile.

DanielSan

18,773 posts

167 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
This is total fantasy, but I wonder if Williams could be sweet talked back into the glory days if Renault power with the promise of cash from RedBull/Renault. They'd probably take one look at what how McLaren have done running on nostalgia and run a mile.
Williams were running Renault power pre hybrid and got nowhere, the best decision they've made in the last few years is to spend more money and get a Merc lump in the car.

VolvoT5

4,155 posts

174 months

Wednesday 29th July 2015
quotequote all
I really should be possible for Renault to catch up on the engine if they are motivated to do so. Ferrari have made massive leaps forward with the engine this year, to the point where most 'experts' seem to agree they very close to Mercedes now. I mean if the Redbull had a motor with Ferrari level of performance they would probably be beating Ferrari and challenging Merc frequently.