Inappropriate Drag Racing Cars?

Inappropriate Drag Racing Cars?

Author
Discussion

daytona365

1,773 posts

164 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
No, quarter mile, but it did have a cone air filter fitted.

PanzerCommander

5,026 posts

218 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
The beauty of bracket racing is you can race anything, from a VW Sharan to a dragster and still be competitive which means you don’t need deep pockets to compete just a consistent car and an ability to cut a good light (my biggest failing at the moment).

Cotty said:
But jet cars are quicker than top fuel? I thought they were. No need for traction just light the afterburners and go.
Top fuel is way quicker than jet cars/trucks it’s the pinnacle of the sport in terms of power and speed. Top fuel races over the 1000ft now rather than the 1/4 (1320ft) and in the States they are well into the 3 second 1000ft range even in funny cars. I believe they were in the mid 4's over the full 1/4 mile. We are a little behind in Europe but that’s mainly down to the low track time compared to racers in the US.

Methanol cars inhabit the 5 second zone with Super Pro cars running 6's regularly. Even street legal cars (on treaded tyres and pump gas in a MOT’able state) are running low 7's in the UK

The only thing faster than top fuel is rocket power at the moment (a rocket dragster holds the 1/4 mile record).

Cotty

39,539 posts

284 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
PanzerCommander said:
Top fuel is way quicker than jet cars/trucks it’s the pinnacle of the sport in terms of power and speed.
PanzerCommander said:
The only thing faster than top fuel is rocket power at the moment (a rocket dragster holds the 1/4 mile record).
Jet, rocket whats the difference?

PanzerCommander

5,026 posts

218 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Cotty said:
Jet, rocket whats the difference?
A rocket engine requires both a stored oxidiser and a fuel source. A jet engine draws in air, compresses it, mixes it with fuel and burns it like any conventional air breathing engine.

A rocket engine has a much higher power to weight ratio than a jet engine for the same thrust output (there is far less of it for the same thrust output) even when you take into account the tank of fuel and tank of oxidiser required.

Jet cars are also only demonstration classes for the most part, very few places actually race them any more as they are fundamentally less safe than a piston engined car. Rockets are certainly a demonstration class only.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
PanzerCommander said:
A rocket engine requires both a stored oxidiser and a fuel source. A jet engine draws in air, compresses it, mixes it with fuel and burns it like any conventional air breathing engine.

A rocket engine has a much higher power to weight ratio than a jet engine for the same thrust output (there is far less of it for the same thrust output) even when you take into account the tank of fuel and tank of oxidiser required.

Jet cars are also only demonstration classes for the most part, very few places actually race them any more as they are fundamentally less safe than a piston engined car. Rockets are certainly a demonstration class only.
Are there any turbo-shaft powered cars?

daytona365

1,773 posts

164 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Except that rocket/jet cars are not strictly speaking dragsters, which traditionally always made use of an internal combustion engine....Like my Lil ol 320i.

PanzerCommander

5,026 posts

218 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
Are there any turbo-shaft powered cars?
Possibly but I couldn't give you a name for any of them and I can't imagine the launch would be very sprightly, they do use them in hydroplanes though.


daytona365 said:
Except that rocket/jet cars are not strictly speaking dragsters, which traditionally always made use of an internal combustion engine....Like my Lil ol 320i.
I assume that is why they have a Jet/Rocket prefix.

aka_kerrly

12,418 posts

210 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
daytona365 said:
Like my Lil ol 320i.
From your claims your 320I must have a rocket instead of an engine for it to get anywhere near a 10 second pass.


Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
daytona365 said:
Except that rocket/jet cars are not strictly speaking dragsters, which traditionally always made use of an internal combustion engine....Like my Lil ol 320i.
A jet engine, and chemical rockets are internal combustion engines you donkey.

320touring

Original Poster:

1,428 posts

199 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
whysub said:
North Weald event dates are shown at www.maitlandracing.com

Only one car and bike date left on Sunday 26th July, and bikes only on 9th August. £10 to spectate, £25 to run the track.

Some really good vehicles there (plenty of sub-10 second quarter mile times from road cars), including (this time) quite a few Transit vans too. Top day out!

The 58.16 second 100E:



Edited by whysub on Tuesday 7th July 13:53
thanks for that- will see if I can make the 26th July..

PanzerCommander

5,026 posts

218 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
A jet engine, and chemical rockets are internal combustion engines you donkey.
He probably meant reciprocating piston engine, at least that’s how I interpreted it.

But going back on topic, I personally don’t think there is such a thing as an inappropriate car for drag racing (unless it can’t make the full 1/4 mile in 30 seconds as the equipment times out) because as I said, the beauty of the drag racing bracket classes means that as long as it complies with the rules for that class the dial your own index puts the outcome with the drivers skill and his knowledge of the car rather than the depth of his pockets, it’s what allows 17/18 second VW Sharan people carriers to be competitive against 13 second Mustangs like mine, or my Mustang to be competitive against 9 second cars when I race in American Super Stock.

iacabu

1,349 posts

149 months

Sunday 30th August 2015
quotequote all
Bit of a thread bump...I've seen CRXs, corsas and astra vans running 11s and 12s 1/4 miles and a mkII Granada run a 10.97 at 140+mph

Caruso

7,436 posts

256 months

Sunday 30th August 2015
quotequote all

Davie

4,745 posts

215 months

Sunday 30th August 2015
quotequote all
I used to play up at Crail quite a bit back in the day with a Cavalier Turbo... had a few great races with a guy in a Rover 220 Tomcat, an S40 T4 and a Sapphire Cosworth. The bewilderment on the "young teams" faces was superb as three completely unknown quantities took on the fabled Cossie and beat in on several occasions. In fact Crail used to be pretty well known for getting anything that moved flung down the strip on a regular basis! Good times! Literally...

marmitemania

1,571 posts

142 months

Sunday 30th August 2015
quotequote all
Caruso said:
I thought that was the Top Gear Avantime for a second.

hwajones

775 posts

181 months

Dapster

6,932 posts

180 months

P4ROT

1,219 posts

193 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all

R8VXF

6,788 posts

115 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
These are always fun to watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=050xRyP734U

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
I always liked the old JCB "GT":




;-)