RE: Porsche 911 GTS vs Jaguar F-Type

RE: Porsche 911 GTS vs Jaguar F-Type

Author
Discussion

DJRC

23,563 posts

236 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Now I enjoy a good troll as much as the next chap but I'm afraid old boy describing an Arna as anything other than st shows your hand a little too much.

Even Tifosi aren't that dumb to go there and we defend most things red and rusty even as they leave us stranded and leak fuel.

RoverP6B

4,338 posts

128 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
I simply mentioned that the Arna at least was somewhat redeemed by having a proper Alfa engine.

chrispmartha

15,486 posts

129 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
All of the individual factors I listed go into what makes 'soul'.
Only in your opinion, in mine a car can't possess soul as it's just metal and rubber.

It often seems to get touted when people are just talking about flaws.

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
Only in your opinion, in mine a car can't possess soul as it's just metal and rubber.

It often seems to get touted when people are just talking about flaws.
Yep. Or slagging off a car that is objectively better than the one that they prefer. "Sure - it is faster and more comfortable and has better steering feel and handling and is more economical and is more reliable etc etc, but it doesnt have soul!!"

Robert Elise

956 posts

145 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
Only in your opinion, in mine a car can't possess soul as it's just metal and rubber.

It often seems to get touted when people are just talking about flaws.
it's all projection - all in the mind for sure.
great memories from road trips, history of the marque and 'joining the club', trails and tribulations of ownership.
There is of course no objective soul in a car, but we're human. so let's cut the Alfa owners some slack ;-)

chrispmartha

15,486 posts

129 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
Yep. Or slagging off a car that is objectively better than the one that they prefer. "Sure - it is faster and more comfortable and has better steering feel and handling and is more economical and is more reliable etc etc, but it doesnt have soul!!"
Which is what I don't get, if you prefer one car over another for whatever reason, it doesn't really matter, we are all different and want different things.

Soul in a car is not a real thingStating ane car has should and another hasn't as a fact seems rather odd.

Robert Elise

956 posts

145 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
Which is what I don't get, if you prefer one car over another for whatever reason, it doesn't really matter, we are all different and want different things.

Soul in a car is not a real thingStating ane car has should and another hasn't as a fact seems rather odd.
yep, sometimes people struggle to articulate what they mean and feel.
Just because a car is faster or can corner at 1.5G doesn't make it better, just that we often fumble with describing what we want/like/feel and the metrics for a good car are often not objectively measured. We should still try though, it's part of the fun on here.
I often 'criticise' modern Porsches (lack of soul???) yet i'm a big fan of the brand's history and the sound of a flat six. So while i criticise at some level i feel a certain 'soul' present when i see and hear a 911. I've always appreciated driving them as they're proper driver's cars. That's just me growing up with that car being a poster child for a real sports car rather than say a purble Lambo which to me seemed silly and unuable.

vinnie23

2 posts

117 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
Im sorry but i just don't get the article?
The Porsche does everything right,right across the board whilst agreeing you go onto trying to turn these into negatives.
We all love a British built car but please leave the smutter press to the likes of the daily tabloids.

Rammy76

1,050 posts

183 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
My friends dad treated himself to a 2009 Porsche Carrera 4S with his retirement money and I've got to say the flat 6 sounds wonderful. He previously had a 4 cylinder 944 so obviously it sounds much better than That did! It really is an impressive car.

Never heard an F Type yet but I'm sure it will sound nice too.

Edited by Rammy76 on Friday 4th September 16:17

mattf93

1,273 posts

115 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
Rammy76 said:
My friends dad treated himself to a 2009 Porsche Carrera 4S with his retirement money and I've got to say the flat 6 sounds wonderful. He previously had a 4 cylinder 944 so obviously it sounds much better than! It really is an impressive car.

Never heard an F Type yet but I'm sure it will sound nice too.
F type noise is nice, but some of the mannerisms are a little bit too engineered/forced e.g. pops and bangs every time etc - some don't like that.

Atmospheric

5,305 posts

208 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
I'll take the F, please. All.day, everyday.

So could Jag SVO commission a manual V8R then, by request?

RoverP6B

4,338 posts

128 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
vinnie23 said:
Im sorry but i just don't get the article?
The Porsche does everything right,right across the board whilst agreeing you go onto trying to turn these into negatives.
We all love a British built car but please leave the smutter press to the likes of the daily tabloids.
No it doesn't, crap electric steering for a start - no matter how hard the engineers try, electric steering will never be good at anything but saving the odd thimble of petrol.

mattf93

1,273 posts

115 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
No it doesn't, crap electric steering for a start - no matter how hard the engineers try, electric steering will never be good at anything but saving the odd thimble of petrol.
jag steering also electrically assisted now...

RoverP6B

4,338 posts

128 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
I know the Jag saloons were going electric, thought the F-type was still hydraulic?

Buster73

5,061 posts

153 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
mattf93 said:
jag steering also electrically assisted now...
Rover has just been kicked right in the nuts , this thread is going from bad to worse for him.

mattf93

1,273 posts

115 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
I know the Jag saloons were going electric, thought the F-type was still hydraulic?
Afraid not. all electrical, kept the announcement on the 'down low' when they released the fact that auto v8 r/v6s were going AWD. If you look or watch recent f type reviews they mention it - but do say the system is very good. So if you want a hydraulic rack... look at pre 64 reg cars i think - you would have to check with jaguar for confirmation on when the switch was made though.

RobinBanks

17,540 posts

179 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
I've never understood the obsession with one car being lighter than another.

Unless you have to lift it or the only road to your house is a bridge which looks like something from Indiana Jones, I can't really work out the problem if the car still has the performance you'd like. The F-Type has the performance I'd want and as such the weight is irrelevant.

mattf93

1,273 posts

115 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
RobinBanks said:
I've never understood the obsession with one car being lighter than another.

Unless you have to lift it or the only road to your house is a bridge which looks like something from Indiana Jones, I can't really work out the problem if the car still has the performance you'd like. The F-Type has the performance I'd want and as such the weight is irrelevant.
Depends on how sensitive the driver is to weight, and if they occasionally track their car - that is a place where the 300kg increase in weight would inevitably show.

But I understand your point. All depends on a driver to whether they're bother about that type of thing.

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
Weight is the enemy of an engaging drive, and increasing weight makes balancing ride and handling harder and harder. Heavy cars also really struggle to maintain good steering feel and chassis feel. Brakes suffer for feel and staying power, too. Grip limits have to increase, too, which means the car is less fun at low speeds. Etc etc etc

If you can't feel the difference between the way a 1500kg car feels as compared to one that weighs 1200kg, you may also enjoy an 1800kg 'sports car'. But weight is pretty important to most driving enthusiasts.

RobinBanks

17,540 posts

179 months

Saturday 5th September 2015
quotequote all
But it doesn't always happen that way.

I don't know at the moment whether I'd prefer the 911 or the F-Type as I haven't driven either. I wouldn't simply decide that one is better than the other because of the weight.