Consumer Rights Act 2015

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Those of you who have studied up on the legislation that governs the sale of goods and other aspects of the law affecting consumer purchases of goods and services may wish to have a shuftie at the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The Act introduces various new provisions and makes amendments and repeals to various extant Acts and Regulations, including the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Sale of Goods Act 1979, the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, and other instruments not listed here.

NB, the Government website will take some time to display amended versions of primary legislation (Acts), and usually displays un-amended versions of secondary legislation (Regulations, Orders in Council, etc). Subscription services such as Westlaw quickly display amended versions of primary and secondary legislation. Much commentary on consumer law websites (much of which is inaccurate anyway) will be out of date. Note carefully the effect of transitional provisions.

No more from me on this subject, as I have given up posting here, and in any event am busy with various life events, but those of you who are into this sort of thing, fill yer boots! Those who have the bloke in pub edition of "That law shiz is well easy innit" can continue referring to now repealed or amended provisions for ages yet to come, in the usual way.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Why do you feel the need to have a holier than thou dig at others?


hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
Why do you feel the need to have a holier than thou dig at others?
BHIAL.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
To annoy you. Cheers!

andburg

7,285 posts

169 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
To annoy you. Cheers!
This truly excellent flouncing clap

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
To annoy you. Cheers!
You don't but you so make yourself look pathetic.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
HTH!

Ekona

1,653 posts

202 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Having read a bit about this new Act this morning, being completely unaware of it beforehand, it looks a very positive step for consumers. The part about referring to digital games it interesting to me, as it would appear to make provisions for downloading a game that you find out is bugged to high heaven. For example, something like the game-breaking bugs found early on in Skyrim or the current release of THPS5 which is absolutely ruined by glitches, these should surely be covered by the Act?

Actus Reus

4,234 posts

155 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
To annoy you. Cheers!
He actually says that when he's summing up in court. True fact.

Derek Smith

45,654 posts

248 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Those of you who have studied up on the legislation that governs the sale of goods and other aspects of the law affecting consumer purchases of goods and services may wish to have a shuftie at the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The Act introduces various new provisions and makes amendments and repeals to various extant Acts and Regulations, including the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Sale of Goods Act 1979, the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, and other instruments not listed here.

NB, the Government website will take some time to display amended versions of primary legislation (Acts), and usually displays un-amended versions of secondary legislation (Regulations, Orders in Council, etc). Subscription services such as Westlaw quickly display amended versions of primary and secondary legislation. Much commentary on consumer law websites (much of which is inaccurate anyway) will be out of date. Note carefully the effect of transitional provisions.

No more from me on this subject, as I have given up posting here, and in any event am busy with various life events, but those of you who are into this sort of thing, fill yer boots! Those who have the bloke in pub edition of "That law shiz is well easy innit" can continue referring to now repealed or amended provisions for ages yet to come, in the usual way.
I've written a few articles on the CRA over the last year or so. It is, from a producers/sales point of view somewhat less restrictive than it might have been.

Are you suggesting that the provisions are in any way contentious? Some of the sections came about as a result of attempts to by-pass the provisions of the previous acts and I think it is about time that the law relating to digital content was clarified and some of the tactics used to avoid responsibility blocked.

I know that 'not as bad as anticipated' does not mean it is not bad, but I think it is reasonable. It is clearly written which makes a bit of a change.


mikeveal

4,571 posts

250 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
No more from me on this subject, as I have given up posting here,
Oh no you haven't.[/panto]

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Too meta! Pop will eat itself!

Derek, I made no suggestion of any kind about the Act's contents. I merely drew attention to its existence. Anyway, having achieved the twin mission goals of providing a heads up to people interested in such things, and winding up the hilariously easy to wind up Purple Moonlight, I really am out of here now. Big mwahs to all.

Derek Smith

45,654 posts

248 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Actus Reus said:
True fact.
Pleonasm alert!

0000

13,812 posts

191 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
I have given up posting here

JustinP1

13,330 posts

230 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
I really am out of here now. Big mwahs to all.


Words made famous by a true flouncer - 8th May 2015.

Edited by JustinP1 on Thursday 1st October 10:15

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Hey! My teeth (and dress sense) are st, but not that st!

JustinP1

13,330 posts

230 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
No more from me on this subject, as I have given up posting here, and in any event am busy with various life events, but those of you who are into this sort of thing, fill yer boots! Those who have the bloke in pub edition of "That law shiz is well easy innit" can continue referring to now repealed or amended provisions for ages yet to come, in the usual way.


Edited by JustinP1 on Thursday 1st October 10:46

Actus Reus

4,234 posts

155 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Pleonasm alert!
In the quiet words of the Virgin Mary, come again?

Derek Smith

45,654 posts

248 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Actus Reus said:
Derek Smith said:
Pleonasm alert!
In the quiet words of the Virgin Mary, come again?
Using more words than are necessary. It is similar to tautology and there is some overlap. At this moment in time.

I was hoping for an argument about which it was.


Actus Reus

4,234 posts

155 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
By the way, my local public school burned down the other night - wasn't anybody here was it?