Homeopathy.... At last

Author
Discussion

carl_w

9,181 posts

258 months

Saturday 14th November 2015
quotequote all
ReallyReallyGood said:
Playing devil's advocate for a moment, if such a placebo did genuinely make some percentage of patients feel better - thus preventing them from undertaking the time and resource for further investigations at greater expense to the NHS - isn't it money well spent?
Why not fund an NHS Homeopathy Centre that just sends patients away with tap water then?

TwigtheWonderkid

43,364 posts

150 months

Saturday 14th November 2015
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
For some reason Homeopathy Sans Frontieres didn't rush to Sierra Leone for the Ebola crisis...
rofl

I wonder why. Surely they have some hocus pocus stuff that would have protected them. You'd almost think they had a lack of confidence in their product. Like the lightning conductor on the church steeple.


NWTony

2,849 posts

228 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
NWTony said:
Gosh another anecdote from your past to support your position. Yay!
I hope you enjoyed it and got something out of it. Anecdotes are so much better than guesswork and prejudice.
Surely you missed winky smiley off the end of that??


anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMGIbOGu8q0

That Mitchell and Webb Look: Homeopathic A&E

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

186 months

Sunday 15th November 2015
quotequote all
NWTony said:
Derek Smith said:
NWTony said:
Gosh another anecdote from your past to support your position. Yay!
I hope you enjoyed it and got something out of it. Anecdotes are so much better than guesswork and prejudice.
Surely you missed winky smiley off the end of that??
Am I the only person that pictures Grandpa Simpson when reading one of Derek's lengthy anecdotes?

"I was wearing an onion in my belt, which was the style at the time..."

julian64

Original Poster:

14,317 posts

254 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
richie99 said:
julian64 said:
Sorry you didn't get the point of my post

Placebo is real, but spending millions on drugs that have no effect is the most expensive way possible to supply the placebo effect.
No real axe to grind either way but as I understand it, there are many very expensive 'real drugs', you know from proper pharma companies and everything, that are scarcely better than placebo, and only then on the basis of selecting the trials that show the best results. That's a much better way of wasting serious money, with the added advantage that the side effects can create problems the patient didn't have in the first place, or even kill them.
Not sure if serious?

If so then you may want to have a read of this website

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance

Its quite a large english organisation tasked with sorting out the waste you describe, with 'no axe to grind either way'. If you want to rubbish their efforts then you'll need a little more than your opinion on 'real drugs'. smile

VolvoT5

4,155 posts

174 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
julian64 said:
Not sure if serious?

If so then you may want to have a read of this website

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance

Its quite a large english organisation tasked with sorting out the waste you describe, with 'no axe to grind either way'. If you want to rubbish their efforts then you'll need a little more than your opinion on 'real drugs'. smile
I've realized there is little point debating with the pro homeopathy and alternative therapy lot. In their mind "big pharma" and "allopathic medicine" = pure evil. Homeopathy and other unproven witchcraft is "natural" and therefore automatically "safe" and wonderful.


TwigtheWonderkid

43,364 posts

150 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
richie99 said:
No real axe to grind either way but as I understand it, there are many very expensive 'real drugs', you know from proper pharma companies and everything, that are scarcely better than placebo, and only then on the basis of selecting the trials that show the best results. That's a much better way of wasting serious money, with the added advantage that the side effects can create problems the patient didn't have in the first place, or even kill them.
Can you name a legitimate drug currently prescribed that is both scarcely better than a placebo and comes with fatal side effects?

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

233 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
now there are less homeopathy prescriptions, the ones that are left are technically even more powerful, I think

maxxy5

771 posts

164 months

Monday 16th November 2015
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMGIbOGu8q0

That Mitchell and Webb Look: Homeopathic A&E
I came to post that smile

TwigtheWonderkid

43,364 posts

150 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
My favourite line, often quoted by homoeopathy believers, psychics, faith healers and the rest of the woo brigade, is "well, science doesn't have all the answers you know".

Errr...that's right, science doesn't have all the answers. That's pretty self evident by the fact that we still have scientists, and science endeavour is still going on. Because if science did have all the answers, we wouldn't still be doing it, you fking idiot!

Fastpedeller

3,872 posts

146 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Ok - now I'll put the cat amongst the pigeons and give an 'alternative' view. My Wife was suffering from a condition for which the NHS could offer no help except life-changing surgery, which they considered had to be done within 6 months. She was very much fearful of this (the outcome of which couldn't be guaranteed as a cure) and went to a Homeopath. Within weeks her condition improved, and despite the Consultant dismissing her 'cure' as rubbish, and stating the 'local butchers' would end up operating (rather than this particular Consultant as the best in the land) after 20 years my Wife is still symptom-free (self-prescribing Homeopathic remedies which she changes when needed from experience gained over that time). One thing to consider when discussing 'cures' is that the human body cures itself.... sometimes it needs a little help, but ultimately if you are ill drugs won't cure you if your body doesn't respond. Whether it's all in the mind? Who knows? But I've seen a great result, and consider it worked. If paying the Homeopath 40 quid for 45 minutes 'chat' convinced my Wife's body to cure itself worked, then it's money well spent. Maybe the mind is that powerful? Certainly I've competed in races where I've 'entered the zone' and produced a performance far better than expected - down to mindset at the time? All I have to add is that if (as appears to be the case IF the remedies do nothing) a particular Homeopath has such a HUGE ability to help the patient cure themselves, then that opportunity should be encouraged.

eldar

21,749 posts

196 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
What was the condition?

Fastpedeller

3,872 posts

146 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
eldar said:
What was the condition?
endometriosis

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
A lot of ailments can be caused by psychosomatic illness, stress being one. The stress is the stimulus and the effect is the person feeling unwell.

Take the stress away and the person feels well. The stress relief could be a 45 minute chat , and the cognitive behaviour of the effected person changes and revaluates the way they think and process things.

Less stress, no medicine given, but there is no justification to cure something as no cure was given.

This is Homeopathy principles, it nothing to with the mind healing itself, the brain just isn't that powerful.

eldar

21,749 posts

196 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Fastpedeller said:
endometriosis
Thanks.

dandarez

13,282 posts

283 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
dandarez said:
She even told me better to sit and go, not stand, and to massage the bladder to ensure it's empty.
At the risk of learning something I may want to unlearn, how? It's inside the insides and short of perusing Gray's Anatomy and donning rubber gloves seems relatively unreachable.
LOL!

I didn't say stick your hand 'inside' to find it, did I?

Simply put your hand on your lower abdomen, and lightly push and massage gently in that area. You'll find any piss left in your bladder ...comes out your manhood. Amazing. Try it!

I was surprised too.

EDIT
Just thought, you probably still think I'm having a laugh.
Massaging bladder (area) at home - I wonder, is that 'home'eopathy? wink

Cuba has health info about it, but providing links not quick.

I wonder, is anywhere else suggesting this bladder massage? Quick google.
NHS? Bugger all that I can find.
Ahh. Yep, USA.

Here's good link with pretty pics!
It's also printer friendly, if you want to put in your loo to remind you. If not, close the print page. biggrin

See Home(eopathy) winkCare section about half way down.

http://printer-friendly.adam.com/content.aspx?prod...


Edited by dandarez on Tuesday 1st December 01:35

Derek Smith

45,660 posts

248 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Fastpedeller said:
Ok - now I'll put the cat amongst the pigeons and give an 'alternative' view.
People do spontaneously get 'better', ie symptoms can disappear. It would appear that the body can cure itself. These points are uncontentious.

What the rather reassuring anecdote doesn't do is prove the effectiveness of homoeopathy 'medicines'.

The scientific investigation into placebos is fascinating, and shows that prescribing a sugar pill can result in a cure or limitation of symptoms. But the pill itself has no therapeutic effect whatsoever. Obviously, otherwise it wouldn't be a placebo.

Placebos work. They can be shown to work in double-blind tests. My understanding is that few scientists have come up with a tested theory as to why.

The test of a medical product is that it exceeds the effectiveness of a placebo significantly and predictably. Homeopathy remedies fail to pass this test. This means that, in effect, that the material given to your wife could have been replaced by water (no one would be able to differentiate between the two) from the tap and the results would have been the same.

For some conditions the effectiveness of a placebo, and a homeopathic prescription, would be as high as 1/3rd. There's much to learn about the placebo effect. There is nothing to learn about placebos.

I have to say, I find the placebo effect fascinating. Really weird.


julian64

Original Poster:

14,317 posts

254 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Fastpedeller said:
eldar said:
What was the condition?
endometriosis
Erumm surgery isn't the first line cure for endometriosis. Usually a laparoscopy for ablation is a last resort after quite a lot of medical treatment.
And laparoscopy is minimally invasive surgery. Your wife would have two surgical wounds on her abdo. each about a centimeter long. Hardly butchery.

Even hysterectomy would have no scar as unless your wife was very overweight it would be a vaginal hysterectomy.

Way before this your wife would have been offered tablet hormone treatment over a year or possibly an interuterine coil.

?

TwigtheWonderkid

43,364 posts

150 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Mirena coil completely cured my wife's endometriosis, virtually overnight, after years of pain.

Bloody brilliant these proper doctors.