RE: BMW M4 vs. Nissan GT-R 45th Anniversary

RE: BMW M4 vs. Nissan GT-R 45th Anniversary

Monday 30th November 2015

BMW M4 vs. Nissan GT-R 45th Anniversary

A few ticks on an M4 order sheet swiftly take it to GT-R territory; can it compete?



This was a twin-test that entirely came out of coincidence. The beige - sorry, Silica Brass - Nissan GT-R seen here is a 45th Anniversary car, booked in because any anniversary of the GT-R legend merits celebration.

Four turbos, 12 cylinders and nearly 1,000hp...
Four turbos, 12 cylinders and nearly 1,000hp...
A quick glance at the spec sheet revealed that this GT-R, surprisingly for a press car, arrived completely standard, with a list price of £79,780. A lot of money when you consider the first cars arrived here at less than £60K, but still appearing to represent very good value for the power and technology on offer. That list price is just £5,910 more than the PH Fleet BMW M4, heavily optioned as it is with carbon ceramic brakes, dual-clutch gearbox, head-up display and so on. It's an indulgent specification but not entirely unrealistic, 'our' car doing without optional paint, the Active Security package and Comfort Access.

All of a sudden there's a twin test emerging. Can the BMW's more modern twin-turbo six and dual-clutch auto teach the GT-R something? How does rear-wheel drive with some very clever electronics compare with four-wheel drive? Can this test be completed without some reference to interior quality and plastics? To the road!



Nissan GT-R
There's an Audi Q5 diesel owner probably still talking about the time he outdragged a Nissan GT-R on the A3. Seeing him join from a slip road while mid-overtake, I aimed to squirt past and move back over to the inside lane. But there's nothing. A bit of throttle, more throttle, a lot of throttle. No squirt, no moving back over. The Q5 has completed his bolshy, aggressive undertake and is off, no doubt chortling about how amazing his 190hp really is.

World goes blurry very fast in a GT-R
World goes blurry very fast in a GT-R
Point being the GT-R does have some turbo lag, which makes it rather less effective below 2,500rpm. Especially when you've selected manual mode, meaning it won't ever, ever kick down... But lag is exciting, it's something to manage and something to deal with.

Beyond 2,500rpm or so the Q5 wouldn't have stood a chance. Hopefully. The years since the GT-R's introduction have slightly dulled the impact of its numbers but this 550hp standard car remains brutally quick. The turbocharged rush when it does arrive is bombastic and loses none of its urgency as 7,000rpm approaches, speed piling on in huge, intoxicating waves with each gear. It shows the march of progress that this powertrain almost feels like a slightly old-tech installation now. Amazing.

But what the old - all things being relative - methods bring is character, and the GT-R has it in spades. With just the right amount throttle in auto, you can get a spike of boost before a gearchange at 3,000rpm or so. Roll on a gear higher than usual and just feel that boost swell and career you down the road. Or take a gear lower than you need and watch the world become a haze.

Familiar, yes, but still an incredible car
Familiar, yes, but still an incredible car
Despite an apparent obsession with numbers, the key to the GT-R's appeal is how well it delivers on the subjective, intangible elements. Those who continue to dismiss it as some kind of PlayStation on wheels couldn't be further from the truth. It's a truly immersive and very rewarding drive.

The GT-R's electro-hydraulic power steering system is excellent; lucid and feelsome, the aggressive setup makes the wheel wriggle in your hands as it tracks this way and that. It weights up with load and never leaves you in any doubt about what the front (or indeed the rear) wheels are doing. Here the GT-R is comfortably ahead of the BMW and its all-electric system.

The heavier Nissan is better damped too, the Bilstein Damptronic system controlling mass and movements more assertively. In the Comfort mode it nails that neat trick of absolute control with just-about-sufficient fluidity too. Of course it doesn't glide like a Lotus but the non-believers will find a lot more poise than expected. It's massively confidence inspiring where the BMW can feel vague and disjointed. Just leave the other modes for track.

Functionality over pizzazz inside too
Functionality over pizzazz inside too
The four-wheel drive is intuitive and exciting, proactively distributing power rather than waiting for an end to lose purchase. The brakes are superb, the various noises are very cool and it's so damn fast. Though that may have been mentioned already.

The key to remember is that the GT-R is so much more than a one-trick pony. It's quicker than very nearly anything else on the road but more engaging than them too; precise, freakishly agile, communicative, thrilling and meticulously well engineered. Sure, the interior isn't up to much and it's hardly the flavour of the month, but to discount the R35 on grounds of familiarity is a foolish move. This remains one of the great driving experiences.

Look for a used Nissan GT-R in the classifieds!



BMW M4
While PH exists as a voice for the real car enthusiasts, it's easy to see how some vanity and luxury could swing a buying decision. We're all guilty of it. The best cars are those that can effortlessly switch between city crawler and track tearaway with a bit of badge appeal on the side. On the face of it, the M4 should be that car.

You want aggression? M4 has it!
You want aggression? M4 has it!
Certainly the BMW will initially impress more than the Nissan. It's way more stylish inside and out, the seat drops you lower and hugs tighter while all the interfaces feel at least a generation on. As a feel good experience at low speed the M4 is better than the GT-R. Simple as.

Over 30mpg is realistically achievable, the dual-clutch works better both around town and at maximum attack, there's a lot less lag... you can see where this is going. The M4 is the easier car to get along with, while also appearing to make its performance more accessible.

However, the old Nissan can still teach M Division's latest about ride and handling, and excitement too. As mentioned, none of the BMW's three steering modes can match the Nissan's, or come close in fact. The BMW lacks the GT-R's incredible ability to deal with bumps under braking or mid-corner as well, further undermining confidence that the quite spiky power delivery has already put on edge. While ultimately the M4 can probably carry more speed than you expect, those messages telling you it's OK to push on never materialise; it's a leap of faith that's quite intimidating with 406lb ft, an aggressive limited-slip diff and two-wheel drive.

Smooth and dry suits the M4 well
Smooth and dry suits the M4 well
Don't misunderstand; the M4 is excellent in the right environment, namely when it's warm, smooth and dry. Traction is very good, the balance between front and rear grip is excellent and when it does oversteer it's smooth and fantastic fun. With the engine in its wickedly responsive upper reaches and the gearchanges instant, the M4 is an enthralling companion.

But as discussed before, it doesn't reward sufficiently at road speed and more modest commitment levels. The engine can feel ordinary, the steering is numb and the whole experience can feel a bit flat. This in stark contrast to the GT-R, which carries off the neat trick of great involvement without making the driver feel overawed.

While the BMW lacks the GT-R's savage outright pace, it isn't far behind. The immediacy of the throttle response is on another plane, but combined with such ferocious torque at low revs is what can make it unsettling on occasion. Further up the rev range it feels much more naturally aspirated, willing and eager in a way the GT-R simply can't match. Furthermore, now we have the fake noise fixed it might even sound better.

Out of its depth or punching above its weight?
Out of its depth or punching above its weight?
Motorway journeys swing the balance in favour of Germany, the taller gearing and more intuitive infotainment making longer trips that bit more comfortable. The Nissan isn't terrible here, it's just that the BMW is better. The Nissan's seat in particular feels curiously high and overstuffed after the excellent one found in the M4.

There's little doubt the BMW's take on the twin-turbo, six-cylinder and four-seater (ish) coupe outdoes Nissan's in certain key areas. But are those enough to take a victory?

Look for a used BMW M4 in the classifieds!



Verdict
This conclusion requires a couple of qualifiers in the BMW's favour. Firstly, it's worth remembering the BMW is ostensibly a sub-£60K car, one that should cost £15,000 less than the GT-R even with a few desirable options. It's only through an extensive options raid that these two are in the same ballpark, and we wouldn't typically call them close rivals.

Nissan ahead on the road and the final ranking
Nissan ahead on the road and the final ranking
The second is that this time of year really does not favour the BMW at all. It simply isn't at home on wet, bumpy autumnal roads. Not ideal for UK roads but the fact is inescapable.

In the end the conclusion is a relatively simple one, even if it pains a lifelong M fanboy to write it; the costlier and faster Nissan is more exciting, more involving and more rewarding, more of the time. The advantages the BMW holds in terms of everyday amenability, perceived quality and refinement are nowhere near as great as the Nissan's dynamic victories. Sure, the engine in the M4 feels more modern but, as we're coming to learn, that's not always as appealing as it may sound. Fickle bunch.

Let's deal with some of issues M4 supporters will no doubt have at this verdict. On top of that list price advantage the BMW will be a noticeably cheaper car to run too; the aforementioned fuel consumption for example, along with cheaper consumables (remember Nissan prefers you to replace four tyres at a time) and much lower emissions. And every day the more luxurious, user friendly M4 could prove better company.

But if you can afford to run one for any period, however short, the Nissan GT-R is simply the better car of this pair by the criteria we care about. It may not be the freshest or the most stylish car around, but it remains one of the best. Just don't go for beige.


BMW M4
Engine:
 2,979cc 6-cyl twin-turbo
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch auto (M DCT), rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 431@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 406@1,850-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.1 sec
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 1,612kg (EU, with driver)
MPG: 34 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 194g/km
Price: £73,870 (Basic list of £57,055 plus £1,330 for Black Merino leather, £545 for advanced parking package, £2,645 for 7-speed M DCT transmission, £6,250 for carbon ceramic brakes, £175 for 19-inch M Double- spoke style 437M alloy wheels/Black with mixed tyres, £265 for sun protection glass, £155 for extended storage, £140 for sliding front armrest, £440 for lane change warning system, £395 for Carbon Fibre interior trim, £1,600 for Adaptive LED headlights, £370 for driving assistant, £500 surround view, £825 Head-up display, £675 Harman/Kardon Loudspeaker system, £95 internet and £190 for online entertainment)

NISSAN GT-R
Engine: 3,799cc V6 twin-turbo
Transmission: 6-speed dual-clutch auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 466@3,200-5,800rpm
0-62mph: 2.8sec
Top speed: 196mph
Weight: 1,740kg
MPG: 23.9mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 275g/km
Price: £79,780

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photos: Tim Brown

Author
Discussion

Kawasicki

Original Poster:

13,041 posts

234 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
I drove the M4 at the 'Ring a couple of months back. Hmm, I think the BMW development team should have spent more time there, I thought the car really struggled with bumps.

I drove the Nismo version of the GT-R recently too, just on the road though. It was a lot of fun to drive, but the car had fairly interesting levels of tramlining. Is that feedback? Not so sure.

Out of the two, I would also take the GT-R. It made me laugh more.

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

155 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Never been a GT-R fan (shocking ride, how did they manage to make it so heavy?) but really like it in that colour. You just can't ignore the value of the thing either. It is Supercar quick for less than £100k. And you also know it's driven by a pure motoring enthusiast.

SirSamuelBuca

1,353 posts

156 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
i got the f80 m3 as for a daily just so much nicer imo

whythem

773 posts

176 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Think I'd take the beige over the piss yellow any day.

chrispphunt

13 posts

123 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
I enjoyed reading that article, quite an un-biased duel review with all the stuff i care about in it.
It just shows what an epic car the GTR is- shows how overpriced new specced up BMWS are a bit to me too...

Vladikar

635 posts

167 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
The ride is one of the reasons I bought a GTR in the first place. I agree with everything in the article rolleyes

I just don't know where to go from here now...

Jakdaw

291 posts

209 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
article said:
The GT-R's electric power steering system is one of the oldest available now yet remains one of the best.
Erm... the GT-R has traditional power steering - nothing electric there!

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

204 months

PH Reportery Lad

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
chrispphunt said:
I enjoyed reading that article, quite an un-biased duel review with all the stuff i care about in it.
It just shows what an epic car the GTR is- shows how overpriced new specced up BMWS are a bit to me too...
Thank you Chris, much appreciated! beer

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

204 months

PH Reportery Lad

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Jakdaw said:
Erm... the GT-R has traditional power steering - nothing electric there!
Brochure and press material has it down as electronically controlled? Will investigate.


PZR

627 posts

184 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Judging by the name of the 'Takumi' on the plate, the engine on this GT-R was hand assembled by one of Nissan's female technicians.

matsoc

853 posts

131 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
The M4 appeal (also the appeal of every M) is being a special version of a reassuring, usable ordinary BMW car. If you are looking for that I doubt you will be ever lookig to a GT-R. If you are looking primarily for sporty driving experience the GT-R feels without any doubt stronger, it is a car that encourages you to go faster in a way that is hard to be beaten...

Scottie - NW

1,284 posts

232 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
I enjoy articles like this, it's nice to see cars compared against each other in a fair way, and not the usual RS4 vs M4 vs C63 etc

alock

4,224 posts

210 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Most of the photos seem over-processed to me. Has someone just discovered HDR or a new library of filters they are playing around with?

900T-R

20,404 posts

256 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
The strenghts and weaknesses of the GT-R are pretty much a known entity by now and I doubt this particular one would have significantly changed the picture. That the Beemer comes off so distinctly second best in the 'PH' areas of competence says more about the M4 than about the Nissan, I'm afraid...

Jakdaw

291 posts

209 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Matt Bird said:
Brochure and press material has it down as electronically controlled? Will investigate.
It may be 'electronically controlled' but it's still a traditional engine-driven hydraulic unit that provides assistance.

Mine had a leak so I know this very well!

eybic

9,212 posts

173 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
PZR said:
Judging by the name of the 'Takumi' on the plate, the engine on this GT-R was hand assembled by one of Nissan's female technicians.
It seems there are only 4 of them and they are all male.

Jam12321

164 posts

109 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
GTR all the way on this one.... strange as im generally a fan of BMW's but i seem to have aquired an indescribable dislike for the current M4 and M3. Maybe its the horrific shade of yellow these cars are always pictured in.

GreenArrow

3,551 posts

116 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
I keep reading that the M4 operates in a fairly narrow window, i.e smooth dry roads and that really isn't good enough for UK driving when its damp at least one third of the year and our roads are bumpy and pot-holed. The M3s selling point has always been that it offers high performance in a usable all year round package. This generation of M3 more than any other, seems to be less of an all rounder which I think is a pity. Too much development on smooth race tracks perhaps? The E46 M3 didn't need dry smooth tarmac to shine. This test is also a bit embarrassing for BMW really, in that the R35 GT-R is quite an old car now, despite the updates, as it dates back to 2008, one year after the E90 M3 was launched!

The current M4 is a real looker though, sharper looking that the previous one IMHO.

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

204 months

PH Reportery Lad

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Jakdaw said:
It may be 'electronically controlled' but it's still a traditional engine-driven hydraulic unit that provides assistance.

Mine had a leak so I know this very well!
Fair point, thank you!

PZR

627 posts

184 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
eybic said:
PZR said:
Judging by the name of the 'Takumi' on the plate, the engine on this GT-R was hand assembled by one of Nissan's female technicians.
It seems there are only 4 of them and they are all male.
Don't know how up to date that info is? Here's a bit of Nissan publicity from Spring 2015:



Sorry about the moiré pattern, but it's scanned from something not much better quality print than a newspaper...