Arlo - wireless CCTV - any better alternatives?

Arlo - wireless CCTV - any better alternatives?

Author
Discussion

sidekickdmr

Original Poster:

5,078 posts

207 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Afternoon,

I’m just about to order a Arlo 2 or 3 camera setup, just before i did i thought i would ask if there are any new/better alternatives?

Anyone got Arlo, any complaints?

Thanks smile

wainy

798 posts

244 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
There is the Arlo pro range coming out in the UK in Jan I think.

I was also looking at this range so was going wait until then to get some. I have heard good reviews and easy to install.

VEIGHT

2,362 posts

229 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Thumbs up from me.

Baldinho

585 posts

215 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
It's an easy system to set up and install. As above wait til Jan when the updated cameras come out.

Only annoying thing is there is a five second or so delay before the cameras start recording - they need to work on that as easy to miss someone if they walk by

HotJambalaya

2,026 posts

181 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
I'm running an arlo system which I quite like, its a mix of 4 arlo cameras and 2 arlo Q cameras. In no particular order:

Pros

Can use them outdoors

relatively easy to set up

Decent app

They're very small

Battery life is astoundingly good



Cons

Since they're not recording all the time, they can occasionally miss the action that sets them off, or shut off before action has finished

outdoor ones are magnetic, so people could nick them pretty easily (little camouflage covers are available)

On installing I noticed one of the cameras has a red tint to it, online showed this to be a common problem. Arlo are relatively good about replacing it, but need to receive my old one before sending me a new one, which is hard since I'm never there

One arlo Q has stopped being connected to my system, Im not yet sure if thats a camera problem, or if someone has accidentally turned it off
I think you can only have 5 cameras (unless you buy a 6 bundle) before you have to pay for a subscription

Arlo Q claims you can do 2-way audio, but can't get that to work, I can hear, but not talk back.




Overall, I'm relatively happy with the system. If you're doing just inside then you could look at the Piper system which is apparently excellent. I think Nest do indoor and outdoor, but I think the outdoor cameras still need power

bogie

16,400 posts

273 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Arlo Pro is due soon, it will all work together, but the new cameras have rechargeable batteries and mains power option. So you could do 24 x 7 video if you really wanted to (if you paid for that package)

I use Arlo-Q in the garage, but the function of this camera is now replaced by Arlo Pro cameras, which are better because they are also outdoor and rechargeable options whereas the Arlo-Q is indoor only, mains or USB powered. If you have trouble with 2 way audio, check the mic mute setting in the app. Its easy to miss.

The wire free are the most convenient of course, I get about 6 months between battery changes.

The latency on camera startup is down to how good the wi-fi link is to the camera and speed of broadband. Sometimes it is virtually instant, but on occasions there can be a bit of lag.

Nothing out there that beats it for convenience of install, so long as you understand the limitations of the base package. 7 day rolling cloud based storage. Recording on motion only in default package.


Tahiti

987 posts

248 months

Friday 9th June 2017
quotequote all
Has anyone tried the new Pro version?

Any views on the newer versions?
Is the delayed recording issue mentioned above resolved?

sidekickdmr

Original Poster:

5,078 posts

207 months

Friday 9th June 2017
quotequote all
I never did bring this thread to a close, I did end up buying a 2 camera Arlo setup, and its great!

Yes there are a couple of small niggles, and compared to my 24/7 recording system at my old house its a little limited, but for what I need it for and the flexibility it gives it's great!


Going to get a 3rd camera to add very soon

VEX

5,256 posts

247 months

Tuesday 13th June 2017
quotequote all
Depending on you need, have a look at Canary as well.

I have put in a 6 camera system for a family and it has an Apple TV App as well, so can be viewed on a big screen.

From memory both Canary and Arlo are also HomeKit compatible.

V.

wainy

798 posts

244 months

Tuesday 13th June 2017
quotequote all
I have the Arlo Pro set up.

Like as said earlier - its not 24/7 and can be set up with timers / geo location which is handy (only niggle is that it has some complications when trying to geo locate using 2 iphones and doesnt always recognise when only one is away sometimes)

VEX

5,256 posts

247 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
Logictech just anounced thier own range of cameras as well.

Just as a heads up.

Ej74

1,038 posts

186 months

Sunday 18th June 2017
quotequote all
Having looked at the specs of the Arlo pro is it really worth the extra ...

Any comments

bogie

16,400 posts

273 months

Sunday 18th June 2017
quotequote all
Arlo pro you get rechargeable battery pack as standard, and 2 way audio, a siren in a smaller base station that supports local SD card data backup.

I think the Pro is worth it over the originals. I still have the originals working fine for now. Wouldnt be without it, so convenient.

Tomo1971

1,130 posts

158 months

Sunday 18th June 2017
quotequote all
I had the three camera set up but the lag was far too long. It would record the postman leaving the property - so either it didnt detect him walking towards the camera or took that long to start, only picked up when he was walking away.

As I bought it was amazon, i complained and was able to send it back.

Now have a hard wired system via POE - just over double the money (incl install) but does record 24/7 on a 2TB local hard drive.

MrJuice

3,375 posts

157 months

Sunday 18th June 2017
quotequote all
Tomo1971 said:
I had the three camera set up but the lag was far too long. It would record the postman leaving the property - so either it didnt detect him walking towards the camera or took that long to start, only picked up when he was walking away.

As I bought it was amazon, i complained and was able to send it back.

Now have a hard wired system via POE - just over double the money (incl install) but does record 24/7 on a 2TB local hard drive.
What was the total cost of just the kit please?

Ej74

1,038 posts

186 months

Sunday 18th June 2017
quotequote all
Was the three camera setup the pro or the std camera

Dan_1981

17,414 posts

200 months

Tuesday 11th July 2017
quotequote all
3 camera package available on the prime promo for 225.

Any further feedback?

Henry-F

4,791 posts

246 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
The big problem with Arlo and all the other similar products are the ultra wide angle cameras, 130º in the case of Arlo.

This means your pixels are spread apart rapidly as you move away from the camera to the point where they have an incredibly short effective range - think maybe a couple of metres to identify someone. At 10 metres you are a tiny spec in the middle of the screen. There's some info on optical range of CCTV cameras here on our website.

As has been mentioned you are only recording motion triggered events with a considerable lag in most instances. We recommend recording 24/7 then using motion triggered bookmarks to help search for potentially important footage.

But the biggest problem is that very short effective range. If you're fitting something inside the house and people will be walking past the camera then it might work but for anything outside the house and around your property then pretty much forget it.

Finally whilst there is a free cloud storage plan available 24/7 storage for 14 days is $99 / camera and 30 days is $199 / camera per year. So 5 cameras look like they cost you $1,000 per year in cloud fees unless I'm missing something. Even if cameras 2-5 are half price it's still $600 and how does the system cope piping constant HD video from multiple feeds up the pipe ?

On the plus side the cameras look cute and the video featuring the little girl is sickly sweet without actually telling you very much. If I was a gambling man I would suggest the photo of the dog on the bed and the front porch in the phone screen shot were taken with a DSLR camera, not an Arlo 130º camera.

Henry smile

Dan_1981

17,414 posts

200 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
Understand your the resident expert Henry?!

Do you have a go to recommended setup for day budget, average and high spends?

I know peoples requirements vary but in 'general'?

Henry-F

4,791 posts

246 months

Thursday 13th July 2017
quotequote all
No, we don't have a general suggestion because everyone will need to use different cameras depending on what each location is needing to do / cover.

Always happy for people to give us a call on 01895 233311. We can chat over your requirements whilst viewing the property using internet mapping from which we can take accurate measurements.

From there we can put together a fully priced package.

There is no charge or obligation for doing this.

There is no such thing as a general purpose camera, a good or a bad camera. It's a question of using the right camera for the right job. A Toyota Yaris is great for bobbing around as a cheap holiday hire car but wouldn't be that great on the grid this weekend at Silverstone. It wouldn't be my first choice for carrying the family and all our clobber 2 hours down to the south coast this weekend either.

Henry smile