Options to reduce insulation thinkness in loft conversion

Options to reduce insulation thinkness in loft conversion

Author
Discussion

strath44

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

149 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
We are soon starting a loft conversion and the architect has spec'd 150mm of rigid insulation (kingspan etc) between joists and 37.5mm Kingspan k18 or similar (plasterboard + rigid insulation) as the finishing over the top of this.

Space is a bit tight are there any options other than the kingspan k18 that will offer the same u value but not as thick?

yellowtang

1,777 posts

139 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
TLX Gold/Silver. Can't remember the values but check it out.

roofer

5,136 posts

212 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
TLX gold over rafter, 140 mm under will give .16

120 mm will give .18 with the TLX. No need for insulated plasterboard.

paulwirral

3,161 posts

136 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
I'd think carefully about it whatever system you use

strath44

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

149 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
It's been a real war of attrition this whole area.

The original spec was 100mm in between the rafters with 50mm air gap at sarking, however as the roof joists terminate in the wall head there is no eaves gap or air flow. The BC first requirement with this was to fit a roof vent to every joist space - this would have made the roof look ridiculous with 20 vents in a 9m run.

Anyway we found a new solution and this is the last issue I want to address so yes I am carefully considering it as I do worry about interstitial condensation!

roofer

5,136 posts

212 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
strath44 said:
It's been a real war of attrition this whole area.

The original spec was 100mm in between the rafters with 50mm air gap at sarking, however as the roof joists terminate in the wall head there is no eaves gap or air flow. The BC first requirement with this was to fit a roof vent to every joist space - this would have made the roof look ridiculous with 20 vents in a 9m run.

Anyway we found a new solution and this is the last issue I want to address so yes I am carefully considering it as I do worry about interstitial condensation!
Breather membrane and vented ridge negates this. Your BCO is a dick.

strath44

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

149 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
Indeed, that was actually the route we went in the end!


Little Lofty

3,296 posts

152 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
roofer said:
Breather membrane and vented ridge negates this. Your BCO is a dick.
Agreed, I done dozens of older properties without soffit ventilation, high and low level vents were always accepted and worked a treat. I'm currently upgrading an existing loft (never had regs) BCO has agreed to 80mm in between rafters and 30mm below, this allows for a decent air gap and thermals far beyond what the rockwool was providing, it's not up to current levels but he has allowed a bit of give and take.

catfood12

1,421 posts

143 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
roofer said:
TLX gold over rafter, 140 mm under will give .16

120 mm will give .18 with the TLX. No need for insulated plasterboard.
How does the TLX Gold work ? Do you still have an air gap below the TLX Gold and the rigid foam between the rafters for circulation, or block that completely and just rely on an air gap around the tiles and battens ? If it's the former, surely the TLX is on the cold side both sides of it ?!

brrapp

3,701 posts

163 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
roofer said:
No need for insulated plasterboard.
The insulated plasterboard won't be in the spec for overall u-value, it'll be there to stop any cold bridging through the rafters into the room.

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

225 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
strath44 said:
We are soon starting a loft conversion and the architect has spec'd 150mm of rigid insulation (kingspan etc) between joists and 37.5mm Kingspan k18 or similar (plasterboard + rigid insulation) as the finishing over the top of this.

Space is a bit tight are there any options other than the kingspan k18 that will offer the same u value but not as thick?
Wouldnt 100m king span be sufficient? Sounds like overkill?

Busa mav

2,562 posts

155 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
markcoznottz said:
Wouldnt 100m king span be sufficient? Sounds like overkill?
No , it fails miserably .

wolfracesonic

7,036 posts

128 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
I don't know if you'll get away with anything thinner than the k18s; even the multifoils require their own thickness + minimum 25mm air gap then plaster board: The k18s do have their own integral vapour barrier. Re. the ventilation, I'm assuming this is a mono pitch roof, you can use these if you do need to re-think and have to vent over the top of the Kingspan Abutment vent BTW shouldn't your architect have sorted all this out on your behalf?

roofer

5,136 posts

212 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
brrapp said:
roofer said:
No need for insulated plasterboard.
The insulated plasterboard won't be in the spec for overall u-value, it'll be there to stop any cold bridging through the rafters into the room.
I did actually ring them to double check before i did mine...

http://www.tlxinsulation.co.uk/assets/Uploads/gold...

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

225 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
Busa mav said:
markcoznottz said:
Wouldnt 100m king span be sufficient? Sounds like overkill?
No , it fails miserably .
What's the difference? Yes I know ones thicker, but in a real world situation would there be any difference, I know architects like to go all out on specs.

strath44

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

149 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
Wolfracesonic - he did and I was told there wasn't any options but I'm the sort of person that likes to make sure!

jason61c

5,978 posts

175 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
It just shows what a load of bks building regs regarding U-values etc are.

It should really be upto the owner how 'warm' they want an area.

strath44

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

149 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
The things is that our house was built in 1830 there are so many variables that have to be managed to achieve the said u values its important to keep all factors in consideration!