rex has a new toy...

Author
Discussion

Bee_Jay

Original Poster:

2,599 posts

249 months

Tuesday 14th June 2005
quotequote all
A 70-200 2.8 L IS (along with the 24-70 2.8 L).

Pig in sh*t is an understatement...

[pic]http://www.pbase.com/image/44794559.jpg[/pic]

joust

14,622 posts

260 months

Tuesday 14th June 2005
quotequote all
Good aren't they!

I got one a few weeks ago. First real outing's efforts are all here

Quality is just stunning, and the AF and IS meant even though I was shooting something else at the time, swinging around and hitting the shutter without even thinking about it still gave this short



J

Bee_Jay

Original Poster:

2,599 posts

249 months

Tuesday 14th June 2005
quotequote all
It is truly one of the most fantastic pieces of glass.

I am now saving to buy my own one. Bye bye 100-400, hello 70-200 and teleconverter... ;-)

ehasler

8,566 posts

284 months

Wednesday 15th June 2005
quotequote all
Bee_Jay said:
It is truly one of the most fantastic pieces of glass.

I am now saving to buy my own one. Bye bye 100-400, hello 70-200 and teleconverter... ;-)


Read this before you ditch the 100-400

I still use my 100-400 quite a lot even though I've got the 70-200 + 1.4/2x converters too. Both have their + points, however I try to avoid using the 2x converter if I can avoid it.

Bee_Jay

Original Poster:

2,599 posts

249 months

Wednesday 15th June 2005
quotequote all
Very enlightening...

I will certainly think twice about this...

V6GTO

11,579 posts

243 months

Wednesday 15th June 2005
quotequote all
Even at f11 I think the 100-400 was slightly better. What surprised me, though, was I thought the old 2X gave slightly more contrast, and better colour rendition, than the new one.

Martin.

poah

2,142 posts

229 months

Wednesday 15th June 2005
quotequote all
I'm saving for the 100-400 to complement my 70-200

rex

2,055 posts

267 months

Wednesday 15th June 2005
quotequote all
Interesting reading. We did a test at 400mm with the 100-400 and with a 2x converter. The results when I enlarged to both images were the same size were that using the 400mm alone and cropping was sharper.
I have the 1.4x converter and will test it soon.
70-200 is just fabulous in so many ways. Other lenses are not getting a look in at the moment.

joust

14,622 posts

260 months

Wednesday 15th June 2005
quotequote all
I've the 2x MKII and I am sure that the "100% zoom" tests are correct, but I'll be buggered if I can tell the difference when either is downscaled to 1600x1200 or printed on A3!

J

branflakes

2,039 posts

239 months

Thursday 16th June 2005
quotequote all
ehasler said:

Bee_Jay said:
It is truly one of the most fantastic pieces of glass.

I am now saving to buy my own one. Bye bye 100-400, hello 70-200 and teleconverter... ;-)



Read this before you ditch the 100-400


Or this...