The 6.2 Murcielago - a design classic

The 6.2 Murcielago - a design classic

Author
Discussion

carspath

Original Poster:

838 posts

179 months

Thursday 26th August 2021
quotequote all
Rather than hijack the '' LP640 Roadster Manual RHD '' thread , I thought that it would be better to start a new thread about the original 2001-2006 Murcielago following Ferruccio's post about the RM Sotheby's sale of a pretty standard 6.2 for almost US $450,000 .

( Ferruccio : Meanwhile, this happened:https://rmsothebys.com/en/auctions/mo21/monterey/l... )

y700su's comment is also of interest :
(y700su : That is remarkable particularly since it is a pre-LP car! )

.



I believe that the 6.2 Murcielago has been unfairly eclipsed by its more flamboyant facelifted siblings , certainly from a design perspective , and arguably from an engineering perspective too :

1) The 6.2 is not underpowered .
The LP640 was a necessary development , brought on by need to keep up with rival supercar flagships and to maintain bragging rights .
Begin to drive a 6.2 in anger on the road almost anywhere in the world and you will soon be restricted not by its lack of power or torque , but instead by the harsh realities of the 21st century - crowded roads , static and mobile speed cameras , potholes , cyclists , Greta's adherents etc , etc .
The 6.2 is also more than acceptably smooth and linear in its power and torque delivery .
Sales and Marketing demanded the LP640 -- more than any inherent defect in the 6.2's powertrain .

2) Admittedly the E-Gear mechanism got progressively better with every successive Sant' Agata variant , but even the very first E-Gear system could change gear faster , more smoothly and more consistently than almost any human .

The E-Gear vs Manual Transmission discussion is a separate topic - but be aware that car traders will exploit every avenue , and use any argument , for a profitable sale

In 2004/2005 a robotised manual transmission was still pretty much cutting edge ( the F355 with F1 came out just about 8 years prior ) , and this carbon-fibre bodied V12 naturally aspirated flagship Lamborghini partly distinguished itself from its Countach and Diablo predecessors with this new transmission .
E-Gear cars can be very engaging to drive - especially for older drivers who have been brought up on manual transmission cars for whom pulling a paddle at just the right time can be as involving as pushing down with the left foot .
The robotised manual transmission system defined a period ( albeit a short one ) in (super)car history -- it shouldn't be dismissed lightly ---maybe in time it will gain proper recognition and take its rightful place in history .


3) The 6.2 has fewer electronics and fewer ECU's than its successors - a key consideration for any prospective custodian looking at long-term ownership
4 ECU's have the potential for causing a lot more bother and a lot more wallet-wilting than 1 ECU . ​

4) The 6.2 makes an even stronger case for itself when you consider its design story , and its comparatively simple and straightforward appearance , relative to its successors .
Luc Donkerwolke followed classic Bauhaus principles in designing the 6.2
Look at the 6.2's typical Bauhaus grammar - the square and triangle - when looking at the 6.2 head on
It is simple , and straightforward , with no embellishments .

In contrast , the LP640 was facelifted by Filippo Perini , who has readily said that a major part of his design brief as to make the LP640 more dramatic in appearance so as to appeal to a new and wider customer base .
And you can see this in LP640's design language - it is less pure , more startling to the eye initially , but with an appeal that is maybe less enduring (caveat : beauty is in the eye of the beholder etc , etc ) .
The Bauhaus purity is certainly lost in the LP640 .

Later Murcie's acquired an ever more caricatured appearance .
Relative to these later cars the 6.2 looks restrained , mature and dignified ...... all without losing the trademark Lamborghini Wow factor .


So going back to RM Sotheby's sale of a pretty standard 6.2 Murcie for a pretty hefty price --- maybe the market is right , maybe the market has finally identified a pearl , and maybe there is foundation for this startling price --- an unaltered , factory standard , Donkerwolke spec car carries that most rare of commodities - staying true to a carefully considered , honest and unadulterated design brief .


Ferruccio

1,838 posts

121 months

Thursday 26th August 2021
quotequote all
It’s interesting how it varies by car.
My “best” would be

Miura - SV, better, more reliable

Countach - Periscopio, purity, elegance, originality

Diablo - early, last of the old style cars - manual, no abs, no traction control, no power steering. Of all these cars, this is the one that you have to drive most skilfully. As Top Gear found out recently.

Murcielago - SV, there is a purity about the early manual cars but only 186 cars and the quality of the driving experience pip that

Aventador - SV, the SVJ tries to hard, the S is probably a better car but just less brutal and brutal is what makes the Aventador for me and separates it from the earlier cars

BlueFocus

399 posts

35 months

Thursday 26th August 2021
quotequote all
I do prefer the "softer" lines of the 6.2.

By the time they got to the Aventador it had become a bit too angular and too dramatic - if a Lamborghini can be such a thing.


Rude

227 posts

223 months

Sunday 12th September 2021
quotequote all
I prefer the later design. Just preference but I think the lights and addenda are more cohesive on the 640/670. That said, the 6.2 is a thing of beauty in itself.