Over $3.00 a gallon in America........

Over $3.00 a gallon in America........

Author
Discussion

trax

Original Poster:

1,538 posts

233 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
Just seen on the news, petrol stations in America are having to close, as they cannot select a price over $3.00 a gallon at the pumps (yes that is dollars not real money).

God, what would these poor people expect when they travelled on our 'Safe', better looked after (well you got to have a laugh) cheap roads in Britain!

8Pack

5,182 posts

241 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
....Less than £2.00 a gallon (albeit smaller) Give me "half price" anytime........

streaky

19,311 posts

250 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
trax said:
Just seen on the news, petrol stations in America are having to close, as they cannot select a price over $3.00 a gallon at the pumps
That seems ridiculous ... more than USD9.99 I could understand. Maybe they are older pumps with mechanical drums, rather than electronic displays - Streaky

james_j

3,996 posts

256 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
Never mind, in Quatar, it's 10p a litre.

safespeed

2,983 posts

275 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
See this amusing flash animation:
http://toccionline.kizash.com/films/1001/178/index.php

See also the Safe Speed crisis fundraising appeal:
www.safespeed.org.uk/appeal.html

smeggy

3,241 posts

240 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
The reason why the yanks panic when the price is 'so high' is because they drive such big, thirsty decrepit behemoths – everywhere!

Vipers

32,926 posts

229 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
Sad as it is the damage caused by the weather in the states, bout time they payed for their petrol, they wont build smaller cars, Bush wont join up to reduce emission gases etc etc.

Dear oh dear, my heart bleeds for them, hope it hits $7 a gallon, then they might rethink......

iaint

10,040 posts

239 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
Noticed I was running low heading up the M1, stopped off for an Optimax injection... £1.02/litre.

JonRB

74,817 posts

273 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
Yeah, but come on. The Americans aren't used to paying those kind of prices so it is a big deal for them.

And let's face it, if we weren't being raped with 300% tax on petrol then we'd probably be agreeing with them rather than rolling our eyes and doing an imitation of Python's "Four Yorkshiremen" sketch.

Edit: Although having said that, I would be more than happy to be paying an equivalent of 35.9p/L

>> Edited by JonRB on Sunday 4th September 20:51

mcflurry

9,103 posts

254 months

Monday 5th September 2005
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Sad as it is the damage caused by the weather in the states, bout time they payed for their petrol, they wont build smaller cars, Bush wont join up to reduce emission gases etc etc.

Dear oh dear, my heart bleeds for them, hope it hits $7 a gallon, then they might rethink......


One station went from 1.99 to 7.99 in a day!
The local senator threatened to sue the garage owner unless he could provide a good reason as to why...

puggit

48,526 posts

249 months

Monday 5th September 2005
quotequote all
Funny how in rip-off Britain all the pumps seem to be very well equipped for £1.xx per litre...

deva link

26,934 posts

246 months

Monday 5th September 2005
quotequote all
I deal with people in the US and they are absolutly *raging* about fuel prices.
OK, it's easy to say they should downsize etc, but they have a culture of having large cars - typical family SUV does about 15MPG (US gallons) and they tend to drive greater distances then we do. So the average family in the US is probably already spending more on fuel than its equivalent in the UK.

Also (slighty perverse argument, I know) but the fixed fuel duty we pay means that while our fuel prices have gone up 20% in a year, there's have doubled.

mcflurry

9,103 posts

254 months

Monday 5th September 2005
quotequote all
Are we supposed to feel for USA peeps paying more money at the pump?

philthy

4,689 posts

241 months

Monday 5th September 2005
quotequote all
While I feel for anyone affected by the events in The US, I had to supress a smile watching news footage of a couple of guys pushing their yank tank into a garage. Save the effort lads, a tankfull will barely get you home.

Phil

Highway Star

3,576 posts

232 months

Tuesday 6th September 2005
quotequote all
Yes people over here do have fuel-ineffecient Yank tanks, yes most don't need them and should change, yes they should cut down on their emissions - I don't disagree with any of these points, but as another correspondent above points out, petrol has doubled in price in many places.

While it may not be anywhere near what motorists in the UK pay, it is still a massive increase and to say they should in effect go themselves is a bit harsh IMO. There would be similar ructions in the UK if tomorrow they started charging 1.70 or 1.80 per litre.

There are some in the US who should cut back as they are wealthy, yet still run large new Hummers, Escalades, Explorers etc., but they can absorb the increase. It's the lower end of the economic spectrum that this is hurting most, guys who earn maybe half of what they would do in the UK in a similar job and run an old gas guzzler as its all thats available to them for $100 to buy. If Katrina has highlighted anything, it's that there is a large underclass in US society, not just in the South but everywhere.

To be fair also, I've seen more hybrids like the Prius or Insight out here on the roads in 6 weeks than I ever did at home, and I don't live in California....

webrat

57 posts

226 months

Tuesday 6th September 2005
quotequote all
The US gallon is less than the imperial gallon - what I call a 44 gallon (imperial) drum of petrol is what I think the yanks call a 55 gallon - so their gallons per mile is higher than gpm in England.

8Pack

5,182 posts

241 months

Tuesday 6th September 2005
quotequote all
Highway Star said:
Yes people over here do have fuel-ineffecient Yank tanks, yes most don't need them and should change, yes they should cut down on their emissions - I don't disagree with any of these points, but as another correspondent above points out, petrol has doubled in price in many places.

While it may not be anywhere near what motorists in the UK pay, it is still a massive increase and to say they should in effect go themselves is a bit harsh IMO. There would be similar ructions in the UK if tomorrow they started charging 1.70 or 1.80 per litre.

There are some in the US who should cut back as they are wealthy, yet still run large new Hummers, Escalades, Explorers etc., but they can absorb the increase. It's the lower end of the economic spectrum that this is hurting most, guys who earn maybe half of what they would do in the UK in a similar job and run an old gas guzzler as its all thats available to them for $100 to buy. If Katrina has highlighted anything, it's that there is a large underclass in US society, not just in the South but everywhere.

To be fair also, I've seen more hybrids like the Prius or Insight out here on the roads in 6 weeks than I ever did at home, and I don't live in California....



You have my sympathy Highway Star. I notice from your list that you have driven a mixture of small AND larger cars!

Over here in the U.K. my 4 ltr V8 Jag is regarded as large, I use a 2 ltr Ford "Granada" (which I had before that) for general use, really, I SHOULD get something smaller but I've had it some years, it's reliable and can still give 35 mpg.

It seems to me that our two countries are approaching this crisis from opposite ends. Our cars are pretty much "fuel efficient" but our fuel is loaded with 300% tax, whilst your cars are inefficient and the future fuel price hike is inevitable and there is no way to protect you from it save for new technology.

Your course must better use of "the small car" for everyday trips and using the bigger one when req'd. Actually I rather like the idea of a European small engined well tuned sports car in America! Cheap to run, fast and good handling!...

For us? Well we HAVE to reduce that damned fuel tax! 300% tax on anything let alone on a basic like fuel is just plain crazy!.........

The other thing that MUST change here in the U.K. is the taxing of just "owning" a car......because that makes it more expensive/difficult for lower earners to use two cars intelligently. What's the situation in the U.S....... H/Star?

Do you have a tax on: "ownership"?


>> Edited by 8Pack on Tuesday 6th September 02:29

JonRB

74,817 posts

273 months

Tuesday 6th September 2005
quotequote all
Apparantly Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has stated, in his state at least, sensible petrol prices will soon be returning.

He is quoted as saying
"Oil be back".

I really should be shot for that one

Vipers

32,926 posts

229 months

Friday 9th September 2005
quotequote all
mcflurry said:


One station went from 1.99 to 7.99 in a day!
The local senator threatened to sue the garage owner unless he could provide a good reason as to why...



Sounds like mega rip off merchant, the way it's going it'l be mega punch up at the pumps soon, and it wont just be fisty cuffs either.

Cooperman

4,428 posts

251 months

Friday 9th September 2005
quotequote all
Is our petrol THAT expensive compared with years ago?
I did a quick calculation and it seems as though, in terms of salary levels, it is cheaper now than in the mid-60's.
In 1965 a gallon of 5-star cost around 5/- a gallon (that's 25p, children). So, you got 4 gallons for a pound. Now it's 16 times that much.
However the sort of mid-range job then paying £1500 a year would be paying about £35,000 now (trust me, I'm in engineering recruitment). In other words, petrol has gone up 16 times, whilst salaries have increased by a factor of 23.
Also, my 1.5 litre car in 1966, a Cortina GT, gave never more than 30 mpg. My 2 litre diesel Mondeo now gives over 50 mpg, and that at higher average journey speeds than my old Cortina. Cars are, in relative terms, much cheaper too, especially when you consider equipment levels and performance envelope.
We may not like the cost of fuel, but are we really so hard done by compared with 40 years ago?