Can science prove the glass is half full or half empty ?

Can science prove the glass is half full or half empty ?

Author
Discussion

uglymug

Original Poster:

565 posts

235 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Just wondering !!!!!!!!!

annodomini2

6,862 posts

251 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Always full

ATG

20,585 posts

272 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Best not to look at it

sunbeam alpine

6,945 posts

188 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Do all your household staff have the day off?

Simpo Two

85,469 posts

265 months

Monday 25th March
quotequote all
It's both.

However the liquid always seems to choose the bottom half, thus defying the laws of probability which state that 50% of the time it should be in the top half.

We conclude that gravity is more powerful than probability.

QED. Probably.

Joe M

673 posts

245 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
If your filling the glass, it's half full...
If your emptying the glass, it's half empty...
Any other case, it's just half a glass.

sherman

13,314 posts

215 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
If your filling it with a liquid theres still microscopic gaps in the liquid or it wouldnt be liquid so is it really half full of is it only percived to be half full ?

hidetheelephants

24,410 posts

193 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
It's always full, even when it's empty. Except in a vacuum when it's abhorrent. Science! probably.

Skeptisk

7,498 posts

109 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
As atoms are mostly empty space (tiny nucleus with some electrons sort of moving them) then glass is not even half full.

Simpo Two

85,469 posts

265 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
Skeptisk said:
As atoms are mostly empty space (tiny nucleus with some electrons sort of moving them) then glass is not even half full.
And if it was you wouldn't be able to pick it up...

'I'll have a pint of Neutron Star please'. A heavy ale hehe

sherman

13,314 posts

215 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
And if it was you wouldn't be able to pick it up...

'I'll have a pint of Neutron Star please'. A heavy ale hehe
Its only 440ml but it is an imperial stout teacher
https://atombeers.com/products/neutron-star-imperi...

Simpo Two

85,469 posts

265 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
sherman said:
Its only 440ml but it is an imperial stout teacher
https://atombeers.com/products/neutron-star-imperi...
Damn, beaten to another great idea...

£9 a can, balls to that. But then if you consider it must contain about 1,000 planets, it's good value.

Pobolycwm

322 posts

180 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
This is easily explained by applying Schrodingers theory, the glass exists happily in both states, both half full and half empty simultaneously, until you look at it, whereupon it releases information and the probability waveform collapses, you have now simply determined its state quite easily by looking at it.

Thereby also proving Feynman; that if you can understand quantum mechanics you`re not doing it right


pocketspring

5,310 posts

21 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
But would looking through the glass cause any chromatic abberation?

Super Sonic

4,850 posts

54 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
I don't think science can actually prove anything. It can offer theories based on evidence, but these theories only stand as long as the evidence backs them up, and if new evidence comes to light, we have to revise those theories.
faod, I'm not a god botherer!

Pobolycwm

322 posts

180 months

Tuesday 26th March
quotequote all
pocketspring said:
But would looking through the glass cause any chromatic abberation?
I think that`s one for the white rabbit to ponder over... QED

Simpo Two

85,469 posts

265 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
I don't think science can actually prove anything. It can offer theories based on evidence, but these theories only stand as long as the evidence backs them up, and if new evidence comes to light, we have to revise those theories.
faod, I'm not a god botherer!
The theory of gravity seems pretty good. Casting my eye around the room and outside I can't see anything floating about. My test to disprove the theory of gravity by repeatedly letting go of small objects in mid-air continues to be unsuccessful.

Perhaps the 'theory' part of the theory of gravity is the name we give the phenomenon, ie it might not actually be called gravity, but Dave...

AW111

9,674 posts

133 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
The glass has a safety factor of 2.

jfdi

1,055 posts

175 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
The glass is too big.

goth.casual

8 posts

1 month

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
sherman said:
If your filling it with a liquid theres still microscopic gaps in the liquid or it wouldnt be liquid so is it really half full of is it only percived to be half full ?
If you’re looking at it through an electron microscope it’s mostly empty.

Matter makes up less than a third of the universe.