Cellar question.

Author
Discussion

The Don of Croy

Original Poster:

6,000 posts

159 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Just looked at an Edwardian detached property with a cellar.

House is very nice, modernised, centrally heated, attractive prospect.

But should I be concerned about a damp cellar? No running water, just damp from water table rising and falling, and this has negatively affected the current linings which are warping etc. Probably needs stripping and relining with damp proof boards.

There is no sign of damp at ground floor, and looks like a damp proof course has been injected (or whatever it’s termed).

There’s also a septic tank. I thought they’d been outlawed!

Any advice welcome.


PhilboSE

4,363 posts

226 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Cellars of that era were designed to be damp. The dampness will vary depending on season and weather. Modern materials that absorb damp shouldn’t been there, but it doesn’t stop people from doing inappropriate things. Just use the cellar appropriately and don’t try and treat it as dry storage.

Mobile Chicane

20,832 posts

212 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
PhilboSE said:
Cellars of that era were designed to be damp. The dampness will vary depending on season and weather. Modern materials that absorb damp shouldn’t been there, but it doesn’t stop people from doing inappropriate things. Just use the cellar appropriately and don’t try and treat it as dry storage.
To a point, but there's a level of resilience to extreme weather events required now that the Edwardians couldn't possibly have anticipated.

How's the drainage around the property, how are the gutters holding up? Any run-off from elsewhere?

A water treatment plant isn't mandated unless discharging to a water course.



Equus

16,906 posts

101 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
PhilboSE said:
Cellars of that era were designed to be damp.
I think it's more accurate to say that they lacked the ability to design them to be dry.

I mean, I don't imagine that Edwardian Architects sat down at their drawing boards and thought 'I must make sure this house is cold and draughty and that the cellar isn't properly waterproof, because what we really need is a few more cases of consumption. And while I'm about it, I'd better just move that cess pit a bit closer to the well, otherwise half the children won't die of cholera and the school fees will get quite out of hand'.

They don't build 'em like they used to. wink

PhilboSE

4,363 posts

226 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Equus said:
PhilboSE said:
Cellars of that era were designed to be damp.
I think it's more accurate to say that they lacked the ability to design them to be dry.
That’s fair enough, poor phraseology from me. Probably should have said they weren’t designed to be dry.

dmsims

6,527 posts

267 months

Friday 29th March
quotequote all


Mobile Chicane said:
To a point, but there's a level of resilience to extreme weather events required now that the Edwardians couldn't possibly have anticipated.

The Don of Croy

Original Poster:

6,000 posts

159 months

Friday 29th March
quotequote all
Thank you (all) for your responses.

I did once live in a similar age house with cellar, but we moved when I was 8yo and didn't give it much thought (mainly because it too was a damp and dark place and therefore not somewhere you lurked).

We'll defo keep this on the shortlist for (as and when) we find a buyer for our place.

Purosangue

954 posts

13 months

Friday 29th March
quotequote all
dmsims said:


Mobile Chicane said:
To a point, but there's a level of resilience to extreme weather events required now that the Edwardians couldn't possibly have anticipated.
looks like a Crypt for storing dead pets